Yibei Wang1, Xinmiao Fan2, Pu Wang3, Yue Fan4, Xiaowei Chen5. 1. Department of Otolaryngology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, 100730, China. Electronic address: wangyibei19910115@163.com. 2. Department of Otolaryngology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, 100730, China. Electronic address: 15600747630@163.com. 3. Department of Otolaryngology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, 100730, China. Electronic address: wwppp2012@163.com. 4. Department of Otolaryngology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, 100730, China. Electronic address: chromefan@126.com. 5. Department of Otolaryngology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, 100730, China. Electronic address: chenxw_pumch@163.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate auditory development and hearing improvement in patients with bilateral microtia-atresia using softband and implanted bone-anchored hearing devices and to modify the implantation surgery. METHODS: The subjects were divided into two groups: the softband group (40 infants, 3 months to 2 years old, Ponto softband) and the implanted group (6 patients, 6-28 years old, Ponto). The Infant-Toddler Meaning Auditory Integration Scale was used conducted to evaluate auditory development at baseline and after 3, 6, 12, and 24 months, and visual reinforcement audiometry was used to assess the auditory threshold in the softband group. In the implanted group, bone-anchored hearing devices were implanted combined with the auricular reconstruction surgery, and high-resolution CT was used to assess the deformity preoperatively. Auditory threshold and speech discrimination scores of the patients with implants were measured under the unaided, softband, and implanted conditions. RESULTS: Total Infant-Toddler Meaning Auditory Integration Scale scores in the softband group improved significantly and approached normal levels. The average visual reinforcement audiometry values under the unaided and softband conditions were 76.75 ± 6.05 dB HL and 32.25 ± 6.20 dB HL (P < 0.01), respectively. In the implanted group, the auditory thresholds under the unaided, softband, and implanted conditions were 59.17 ± 3.76 dB HL, 32.5 ± 2.74 dB HL, and 17.5 ± 5.24 dB HL (P < 0.01), respectively. The respective speech discrimination scores were 23.33 ± 14.72%, 77.17 ± 6.46%, and 96.50 ± 2.66% (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Using softband bone-anchored hearing devices is effective for auditory development and hearing improvement in infants with bilateral microtia-atresia. Wearing softband bone-anchored hearing devices before auricle reconstruction and combining bone-anchored hearing device implantation with auricular reconstruction surgery may bethe optimal clinical choice for these patients, and results in more significant hearing improvement and minimal surgical and anesthetic injury.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate auditory development and hearing improvement in patients with bilateral microtia-atresia using softband and implanted bone-anchored hearing devices and to modify the implantation surgery. METHODS: The subjects were divided into two groups: the softband group (40 infants, 3 months to 2 years old, Ponto softband) and the implanted group (6 patients, 6-28 years old, Ponto). The Infant-Toddler Meaning Auditory Integration Scale was used conducted to evaluate auditory development at baseline and after 3, 6, 12, and 24 months, and visual reinforcement audiometry was used to assess the auditory threshold in the softband group. In the implanted group, bone-anchored hearing devices were implanted combined with the auricular reconstruction surgery, and high-resolution CT was used to assess the deformity preoperatively. Auditory threshold and speech discrimination scores of the patients with implants were measured under the unaided, softband, and implanted conditions. RESULTS: Total Infant-Toddler Meaning Auditory Integration Scale scores in the softband group improved significantly and approached normal levels. The average visual reinforcement audiometry values under the unaided and softband conditions were 76.75 ± 6.05 dB HL and 32.25 ± 6.20 dB HL (P < 0.01), respectively. In the implanted group, the auditory thresholds under the unaided, softband, and implanted conditions were 59.17 ± 3.76 dB HL, 32.5 ± 2.74 dB HL, and 17.5 ± 5.24 dB HL (P < 0.01), respectively. The respective speech discrimination scores were 23.33 ± 14.72%, 77.17 ± 6.46%, and 96.50 ± 2.66% (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Using softband bone-anchored hearing devices is effective for auditory development and hearing improvement in infants with bilateral microtia-atresia. Wearing softband bone-anchored hearing devices before auricle reconstruction and combining bone-anchored hearing device implantation with auricular reconstruction surgery may bethe optimal clinical choice for these patients, and results in more significant hearing improvement and minimal surgical and anesthetic injury.
Authors: Tom Gawliczek; Wilhelm Wimmer; Fabio Munzinger; Marco Caversaccio; Martin Kompis Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2018-09-25 Impact factor: 3.411