Literature DB >> 29287599

Ultrasound-guided central venous catheter placement: first things first.

Bernd Saugel1, Leonie Schulte-Uentrop2, Thomas W L Scheeren3, Jean-Louis Teboul4.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29287599      PMCID: PMC5747937          DOI: 10.1186/s13054-017-1921-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care        ISSN: 1364-8535            Impact factor:   9.097


× No keyword cloud information.
We thank Drs. Gawda and Czarnik for their comments [1] regarding our article on ultrasound (US)-guided central venous catheter (CVC) placement [2]. We recommended a “six-step-approach”. Because US is still used infrequently for CVC insertion [3, 4] we aimed to provide a basic, pragmatic, and evidence-based concept applicable in clinical routine rather than making the approach unnecessarily complicated. We discussed that a disadvantage of the short-axis/out-of-plane approach is that not the entire needle but only an echogenic point (that must not be the needle tip) is visualized [2]. Experienced users might perform additional steps during US-guided CVC placement, e.g., double-checking that the needle is not localized over the adjacent artery before entering the target vein (long-axis/in-plane approach). Although this additional step might further improve procedural quality in the hands of experts, it is not backed up by study data and necessitates transiently abandoning the view of the needle and the target vein. This “angle change” of the US probe to check the adjacent artery before puncturing the vein only makes sense if the artery is anatomically located equally deep or deeper (and not more superficial) compared to the vein. US can provide important information about the correct position of the guidewire [2]. As suggested, one can check the ipsilateral subclavian vein (for internal jugular vein CVCs) or the internal jugular vein (for subclavian CVCs) to exclude misdirection of the guidewire. Consequently, following this line of argument, one should also exclude misdirection of the guidewire in the contralateral veins and the thyroid veins. It needs to be emphasized, however, that strictly aseptic conditions need to be ensured during all additional steps; this might even require a second operator excluding misdirection of the guidewire in different veins with an additional non-sterile US probe. Alternatively, one could confirm the tip of the guidewire in the superior vena cava/the right atrium using transthoracic echocardiography. Although not part of our basic recommendations, experienced operators can use US to confirm the correct position of the CVC (direct visualization of the CVC tip or indirect identification of the CVC tip by rapid injection of saline and imaging of turbulent flow in the right atrium or vascular structures) and to exclude iatrogenic pneumothorax [5]. US offers various opportunities to improve the quality and safety of CVC placement, but to advocate and promote US as the standard of care for CVC placement in anesthesiology and critical care our recommendations need to be straightforward!
  5 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Central Venous Catheter Confirmation by Bedside Ultrasound Versus Chest Radiography in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Enyo A Ablordeppey; Anne M Drewry; Alexander B Beyer; Daniel L Theodoro; Susan A Fowler; Brian M Fuller; Christopher R Carpenter
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 7.598

2.  Use of ultrasound guidance for central venous catheterization: a national survey of intensivists and hospitalists.

Authors:  Nilam J Soni; Luis F Reyes; Holly Keyt; Alejandro Arango; Jonathan A Gelfond; Jay I Peters; Stephanie M Levine; Sandra G Adams; Marcos I Restrepo
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2016-07-17       Impact factor: 3.425

3.  Practice of ultrasound-guided central venous catheter technique by the French intensivists: a survey from the BoReal study group.

Authors:  Julien Maizel; Marie-Anaïs Bastide; Jack Richecoeur; Eric Frenoy; Christian Lemaire; Bertrand Sauneuf; Hervé Dupont; Fabienne Tamion; Saad Nseir; Damien Du Cheyron
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 6.925

4.  A systematic approach to ultrasound-guided central venous catheter placement-desirable modifications.

Authors:  Ryszard Gawda; Tomasz Czarnik
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 5.  Ultrasound-guided central venous catheter placement: a structured review and recommendations for clinical practice.

Authors:  Bernd Saugel; Thomas W L Scheeren; Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 9.097

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.