Literature DB >> 29286373

Central and Divided Visual Field Presentation of Emotional Images to Measure Hemispheric Differences in Motivated Attention.

Aminda J O'Hare1, Ruth Ann Atchley2, Keith M Young3.   

Abstract

Two dominant theories on lateralized processing of emotional information exist in the literature. One theory posits that unpleasant emotions are processed by right frontal regions, while pleasant emotions are processed by left frontal regions. The other theory posits that the right hemisphere is more specialized for the processing of emotional information overall, particularly in posterior regions. Assessing the different roles of the cerebral hemispheres in processing emotional information can be difficult without the use of neuroimaging methodologies, which are not accessible or affordable to all scientists. Divided visual field presentation of stimuli can allow for the investigation of lateralized processing of information without the use of neuroimaging technology. This study compared central versus divided visual field presentations of emotional images to assess differences in motivated attention between the two hemispheres. The late positive potential (LPP) was recorded using electroencephalography (EEG) and event-related potentials (ERPs) methodologies to assess motivated attention. Future work will pair this paradigm with a more active behavioral task to explore the behavioral impacts on the attentional differences found.

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29286373      PMCID: PMC5755432          DOI: 10.3791/56257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  14 in total

1.  The divided visual field paradigm: methodological considerations.

Authors:  Victoria J Bourne
Journal:  Laterality       Date:  2006-07

Review 2.  A brief introduction to the use of event-related potentials in studies of perception and attention.

Authors:  Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 3.  Affective picture processing: an integrative review of ERP findings.

Authors:  Jonas K Olofsson; Steven Nordin; Henrique Sequeira; John Polich
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2007-11-17       Impact factor: 3.251

4.  Hemispheric contributions to semantic activation: a divided visual field and event-related potential investigation of time-course.

Authors:  Erin R Smith; Helen J Chenery; Anthony J Angwin; David A Copland
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Offset masking in a divided visual field study.

Authors:  Keith M Young; Ruth Ann Atchley; Paul Atchley
Journal:  Laterality       Date:  2009-02-13

6.  Hemispheric lateralization of perception and memory for emotional verbal stimuli in normal individuals.

Authors:  N Ali; C R Cimino
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Valence and arousal influence the late positive potential during central and lateralized presentation of images.

Authors:  Aminda J O'Hare; Ruth Ann Atchley; Keith M Young
Journal:  Laterality       Date:  2016-10-12

8.  On size, distance, and visual angle perception.

Authors:  D McCready
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1985-04

9.  Event-related potential (ERP) asymmetries to emotional stimuli in a visual half-field paradigm.

Authors:  J Kayser; C Tenke; H Nordby; D Hammerborg; K Hugdahl; G Erdmann
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  Neuronal generator patterns at scalp elicited by lateralized aversive pictures reveal consecutive stages of motivated attention.

Authors:  Jürgen Kayser; Craig E Tenke; Karen S Abraham; Daniel M Alschuler; Jorge E Alvarenga; Jamie Skipper; Virginia Warner; Gerard E Bruder; Myrna M Weissman
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.