Jia Ouyang1, Hui Xu1, Ming Li1, Xingliang Dai1, Fengqing Fu2, Xueguang Zhang2, Qing Lan1. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215004, P.R. China. 2. Clinical Immunology Institute, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215006, P.R. China.
Abstract
Paeoniflorin (PF), a natural compound isolated from Paeoniae radix, has been shown to exert antitumor effects in various types of human cancers including glioma. However, the mechanism of action is not well understood. S-phase kinase-associated protein (Skp)2 functions as an oncogene in many cancers. In the present study, we investigated whether Skp2 mediates the anti-glioma activity of PF. We found that PF inhibited glioma cell proliferation, migration and invasion, and induced G2/M arrest and apoptosis. Skp2 expression was downregulated in glioma cells treated with PF. PF-induced antitumor effects in glioma cells were abolished by Skp2 overexpression but were enhanced by RNA interference of Skp2. Moreover, PF treatment inhibited U87 cell-derived tumor growth in a xenograft mouse model. These results demonstrate that PF exerts its antitumor effects in part by inhibiting Skp2 expression in glioma cells and could be a promising therapeutic agent for glioma therapy.
Paeoniflorin (PF), a natural compound isolated from Paeoniae radix, has been shown to exert antitumor effects in various types of humancancers including glioma. However, the mechanism of action is not well understood. S-phase kinase-associated protein (Skp)2 functions as an oncogene in many cancers. In the present study, we investigated whether Skp2 mediates the anti-glioma activity of PF. We found that PF inhibited glioma cell proliferation, migration and invasion, and induced G2/M arrest and apoptosis. Skp2 expression was downregulated in glioma cells treated with PF. PF-induced antitumor effects in glioma cells were abolished by Skp2 overexpression but were enhanced by RNA interference of Skp2. Moreover, PF treatment inhibited U87 cell-derived tumor growth in a xenograft mouse model. These results demonstrate that PF exerts its antitumor effects in part by inhibiting Skp2 expression in glioma cells and could be a promising therapeutic agent for glioma therapy.
Glioma is among the most common primary brain tumors in adults (1) and is treated by a combination of surgical resection, temozolomide chemotherapy and radiotherapy (2). However, the median survival is not more than 14.6 months (2,3) and the 5-year survival rate after diagnosis is only 0.05–4.7% (4). Two obstacles for chemotherapeutic agents in glioma treatment are penetration through the blood-brain barrier and the development of drug resistance (5,6).Paeoniflorin (PF) is the main component of Paeoniae radix, which is widely used in traditional Chinese medicine (7–12). PF has been shown to repair injury (9), provide neuroprotection (10), and exert anti-inflammatory (11,12) and immunomodulatory (13,14) effects. In addition, in vitro and in vivo studies have reported that PF inhibits tumor growth, invasion and metastasis (15–17). PF suppresses glioma cell proliferation by upregulating microRNA-16 and inhibiting matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)9 (18) and suppresses glioma growth and proliferation by promoting the degradation of signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT)3 (19). However, the precise mechanism underlying the anticancer activity of PF in glioma cells is unclear.S-phase kinase-associated protein (Skp)2 is a component of Skp2-Skp1/Cullin-1/F-box-protein (SCF) complex that functions as an E3 ligase in protein ubiquitination and degradation. Skp2 has been linked to tumor development (20–23), playing an oncogenic role by promoting the degradation of target proteins such as P21 (24), P27 (25) and P57 (26). Skp2 overexpression is correlated with poor prognosis in many types of humancancers, including hepatocellular carcinoma (27), breast cancer (28), melanoma (29) and glioma (30); moreover, Skp2 has been shown to regulate tumor cell proliferation, invasion, migration, senescence, glycolysis, and the Warburg effect (31,32) as well as the self-renewal capacity and functioning of cancer stem cells (33). Protein kinase B (AKT) modulates the phosphorylation of Skp2, leading to enhancement of cell proliferation and tumor progression (34), while suppression of Skp2blocks tumor progression by promoting cellular senescence (32). Skp2-SCF E3 ligase may also promote the ubiquitination of AKT to induce tumorigenesis (31). These findings suggest that Skp2 is a potential therapeutic target for glioma treatment.To evaluate this possibility, the present study investigated the biological effects of PF on glioma cell growth, apoptosis, migration and invasion and examined whether Skp2 mediates the antitumor effects of PF. We found that Skp2 plays an important role in glioma development. PF treatment inhibited Skp2 expression, leading to upregulation of P21 and downregulation of phosphorylated (p-)AKT, which in turn blocked tumor progression. These results indicate that PF is a potentially effective agent for the treatment of glioma.
Materials and methods
Cell culture and reagents
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee approved this study. U87 and U251humanglioma cell lines were obtained from the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (Beijing, China). Cells were cultured in Dulbeccos modified Eagles medium (DMEM; HyClone Laboratories, Logan, UT, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) in a 5% CO2 atmosphere at 37°C. Primary antibodies against Skp2, P21, P27, p-AKT (S473), AKT, extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), p-ERK, cyclin D, p-cyclin D, cleaved caspase-3 and −9, MMP2, MMP9 and β-actin were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA). Secondary antibodies were from Liankebio (Hangzhou, China). Lipofectamine 3000 was from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA, USA). PF was from Tianjin Shilan Technology Co., Ltd., (Tianjin, China) and had a purity of 98%. PF was diluted in DMEM at a stock concentration of 400 mM. Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) was obtained from Dojindo Laboratories (Kumamoto, Japan).
Cell viability assay
U87 and U251 cells (5×103) were seeded in a 96-well plate. Cells were treated with different concentrations of PF for 24 and 48 h. At the end of the treatment period, 10 µl of CCK-8 were added to each well. The plates were incubated at 37°C for 1 h and the optical density at 450 nm was then determined on a Varioskan microplate reader (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).
Cell apoptosis analysis
U87 and U251 cells were seeded in a 6-well plate (1–1.5×105/well) and treated with 15 and 20 mM PF for 24 h. The Annexin V-phycoerythrin (PE)/7-aminoactinomycin D (7-AAD) assay was performed using a kit (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) according to the manufacturers instructions. Briefly, cells were washed twice with cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), resuspended in 100 µl binding buffer with 7-AAD and PE-conjugated anti-Annexin V antibody, and incubated for 15 min at room temperature in the dark before analysis by flow cytometry (Beckman Coulter Inc., Brea, CA, USA).
Cell cycle analysis
U87 and U251 cells were seeded in a 6-well plate (1–1.5×105/well) and treated with 15 or 20 mM PF for 24 h. The cells were harvested and fixed overnight at 4°C with cold 70% ethanol. Cell pellets were resuspended in PBS at a concentration of 1×106 cells/ml and then incubated with propidium iodide (PI)/RNAase staining buffer (BD Biosciences) at room temperature for 15 min. DNA content was determined by flow cytometry.
Cell migration and invasion assay
To assess the effect of PF on cell migration, U87 and U251 cells were seeded in the upper chamber of a Boyden chamber (Corning Inc., Corning, NY, USA) with 200 µl of DMEM supplemented with 1% FBS; 600 µl complete medium with 20% serum were added to the lower chamber along with indicated concentration of PF. After 24 h, cells remaining in the upper chamber were removed using cotton swabs, and those in the lower chamber were fixed with methanol, stained with 0.1% crystal violet and photographed under a microscope. The invasion assay was similarly performed with a Matrigel-coated Transwell chamber (BD Biosciences). Cells in three randomly selected fields were counted.
Transfection
Cells were seeded in a 6-well plate at a density of 1.5–2×105/well. When they reached 80% confluence, the cells were transfected with Skp2 cDNA or short interfering (si)RNA (sense, 5-GGAGUGACAAAGACUUUGUTT-3 and antisense, 5-ACAAAGUCUUUGUCACUCCTT-3) or empty vector (Shanghai GenePharma, Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) using Lipofectamine 3000. At 48 h post-transfection, the cells were collected for analysis of cell proliferation, migration and invasion and for western blotting.
Quantitative real-time PCR analysis
Total RNA was extracted with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) and reverse transcribed into cDNA using the PrimeScript II First Strand cDNA Synthesis kit (Takara Bio, Shiga Japan). PCR was performed using the SYBR Premix Ex Taq kit (Takara Bio) and the following forward and reverse primers: Skp2, 5-GAAGGGAGTCCCATGAAACA-3 and 5-GCTGAAGAGCAAGGGAGTG-3; and glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase, 5-ACCCAGAAGACTGTGGATGG-3 and 5-CAGTGAGCTTCCCGTTCAG-3. The relative expression level of Skp2 was determined with the 2−ΔΔCt method.
Western blotting
Harvested cells or tumor tissue samples were lysed with radioimmunoprecipitation buffer (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, Nantong, China) supplemented with protease and phosphatase inhibitors (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology). A bicinchoninic acid protein assay kit (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) was used to determine protein concentration, and 30–50 µg were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis on a 10–12% gel and transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) that was blocked with 5% bovineserum albumin (BSA) for 1 h at room temperature and then probed overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies. The membrane was then washed with Tris-buffered saline/0.1% Tween-20 and incubated with secondary antibodies. Protein expression was detected by enhanced chemiluminescence (Millipore) and the signal intensity of protein bands was analyzed with ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA) to determine the relative expression levels of target protein to β-actin. The experiment was performed three times.
Xenograft model
Female nude mice (6 weeks old) were purchased from Shanghai Slack Experimental Animal Center (Shanghai, China). U87glioma cells (2×106) in 100 µl saline were injected into the backs of the mice. Tumor size was measured with calipers; when tumors reached 100 mm3, mice were randomly divided into experimental and control groups that were treated with PF and saline, respectively, by intragastric administration at a dose of 1 g/kg in 0.2 ml every day for 18 days. Tumor size and body weight were measured two or three times per week. Animal experiments and use of humancancer cell lines were approved by the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (Suzhou, China).
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were carried out using Prism v.5.0 software (GraphPad Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). Differences between the groups were evaluated by one-way analysis of variance (three or more groups) or the independent t-test (two groups). Results are presented as mean ± SD. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
PF inhibits glioma cell proliferation
In order to investigate the effect of PF on glioma cell growth, the viability of U87 and U251 cells treated with different concentrations of PF for 24 and 48 h was evaluated with the CCK-8. The cell growth was decreased in a time- and dose-dependent manner by the PF treatment in both U87 and U251 cells (Fig. 1A). After the treatment with PF for 24 h, the half-maximal inhibitory concentration of U87 and U251 cells was approximately 20 mM.
Figure 1.
PF inhibits glioma cell proliferation and induces apoptosis. (A) Effect of PF on U87 and U251 glioma cell proliferation at 24 and 48 h. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 vs. control. (B) Effect of PF on glioma cell apoptosis (left panel); and quantitative analysis (right panel). (C) Effect of PF on cell cycle progression. The percentage of cells in each cell cycle phase is shown. Data represent mean ± SD of three independent experiments. (D) Effect of PF on ERK, p-ERK, cyclin D, p-cyclin D1 and cleaved caspase-3 and −9 expression.
PF induces apoptosis and G2/M arrest in glioma cells
PF has been shown to inhibit cancer cell growth. We investigated whether apoptosis is involved in this process with the Annexin V/PE/7-AAD assay. U87 and U251 cells were treated with 15 or 20 mM PF for 24 h. The rate of apoptosis increased from 7.4 to 22.5% in U87 cells and from 3.7 to 23.7% in U251 cells upon PF treatment (Fig. 1B), indicating that PF induces glioma cell apoptosis as reported in previous studies (19).The effect of PF on cell cycle progression was evaluated by PI staining and flow cytometry. Treatment with PF for 24 h caused cells to arrest in G2/M phase, with the fraction increasing from 23.48 to 34.07% in U87 cells and from 27.34 to 52.11% in U251 cells (Fig. 1C).To clarify the effects of PF on glioma cell proliferation and apoptosis, ERK, p-cyclin D1, cyclin D, and cleaved caspase-3 and −9 expression was evaluated by western blotting. PF treatment decreased p-ERK and cyclin D and increased cleaved caspase-3 and −9 levels in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 1D), confirming the results of CCK-8 and flow cytometric analyses.
PF inhibits cell migration and invasion
Since PF at concentrations of 5 and 10 mM did not inhibit the proliferation of U87 and U251 cells (Fig. 1), we chose these concentrations to study the effects of PF on glioma cell motility with the migration and invasion assays. The number of migrating U87 and U251 cells (Fig. 2A) and the number of glioma cells infiltrating the membrane (Fig. 2B) were decreased by PF treatment relative to the control group. These results demonstrate that PF inhibits glioma cell invasion.
Figure 2.
PF suppresses cell motility. (A) Left panel, effect of PF on cell migration, as evaluated with the Transwell assay. Right panel, quantification of results shown in the left panel. (B) Left panel, effect of PF on cell invasion, as evaluated with the Transwell assay. Right panel, quantification of results shown in the left panel. Assays were performed in triplicate. *P<0.05 vs. control. (C and D) Effect of PF on MMP2 and MMP9 (C) and Skp2 and P21 (D) protein levels, as determined by immunoblotting.
To confirm the effects of PF on tumor cell migration and invasion, MMP2 and MMP9 levels were evaluated by western blotting. We found that the expression of both proteins was downregulated by treatment with PF (Fig. 2C); a similar trend was observed for Skp2 in the presence of 5 and 10 mM PF (Fig. 2D). Thus, PF likely inhibits glioma cell migration and invasion via modulation of Skp2 signaling.
PF suppresses Skp2 expression
Skp2 is known to play an oncogenic role in tumorigenesis. To test whether Skp2 is involved in the anti-glioma effects of PF, we evaluated the Skp2 expression in glioma cells treated with PF. Skp2 mRNA (Fig. 3A) and protein (Fig. 3B and C) levels were downregulated by PF treatment in U87 and U251 cells. We then examined whether Skp2 inactivation by PF influences the expression of downstream factors such as P21, P27 and p-AKT. PF inhibited the expression of p-AKT and induced that of P21 and P27 in both U87 and U251 cells (Fig. 3B and C). These results suggest that the antitumor activities of PF are mediated by Skp2 signaling.
Figure 3.
PF inhibits Skp2 expression at mRNA and protein levels. (A) U87 and U251 glioma cells were treated with indicated concentrations of PF and Skp2 gene expression was analyzed by quantitative real-time PCR. (B) Effect of PF on Skp2, P21, P27 and p-AKT protein levels, as determined by immunoblotting. (C) Quantitative analysis of results showed in (B). *P<0.05, **P<0.01 vs. control.
Skp2 overexpression abolishes the antitumor effects of PF
To clarify the role of Skp2 in the antitumor activities of PF in glioma cells, U87 and U251 cells were transfected with Skp2 cDNA and treated with PF for 24 h, and cell growth and apoptosis were evaluated with the CCK-8 and Annexin V/PE/7-AAD assays, respectively. Cell proliferation was increased in cells overexpressing Skp2 (Fig. 4A); moreover, inhibition of cell growth by PF treatment was abolished (Fig. 4A), suggesting that the antitumor effects of PF are exerted at least in part via negative regulation of Skp2. This was confirmed by the finding that overexpressing Skp2 decreased the number of apoptotic U87glioma cells and abrogated the pro-apoptotic effect of PF (Fig. 4B).
Figure 4.
Effect of Skp2 overexpression on glioma cell growth, apoptosis and invasion. (A) Effect of PF in combination with Skp2 cDNA transfection on glioma cell growth was evaluated with CCK-8. Control, pcDNA3.1. cDNA, Skp2 cDNA; Both, Skp2 cDNA+ PF. *P<0.05 vs. control, #P<0.05 vs. either PF treatment or Skp2 cDNA transfection alone. (B) Left panel, apoptosis of U87 glioma cells, as determined by flow cytometry following Skp2 cDNA transfection and PF treatment. Right panel, quantitative analysis of results shown in the left panel. (C) Cell invasion was evaluated with the Transwell assay in cells overexpressing Skp2 and treated with PF. (D) Quantitative analysis of results shown in (C). *P<0.05 vs. control.
To evaluate the role of Skp2 in glioma cell motility, U87 and U251 cells were transfected with Skp2 cDNA and treated with PF for 24 h, and migration and invasion assays were performed. Skp2 overexpression increased the number of cells that infiltrated through the Transwell membrane and abrogated the inhibitory effect of PF on glioma cell invasion (Fig. 4C and D). Similar results were obtained for the migration assay (Fig. 5A). Skp2 overexpression increased Skp2 levels in glioma cells and reversed the inhibition of Skp2 and p-AKT and upregulation of P21 induced by PF (Fig. 5B and C). These results confirm that PF exerts antitumor effects via downregulation of Skp2 in glioma cells.
Figure 5.
Skp2 overexpression reverses PF-induced inhibition of cell migration. (A) Left panel, effect of Skp2 overexpression on PF-treated U251 cell migration. Right panel, quantitative analysis of results shown in the left panel. *P<0.05 vs. control. #P<0.05 vs. either PF treatment or Skp2 cDNA transfection alone. (B) Protein levels of Skp2 and its targets P21 and p-AKT were measured by western blotting in glioma cells transfected with Skp2 cDNA and treated with PF. (C) Quantitative analysis of results shown in (B).
siRNA-mediated knockdown of Skp2 enhances the antitumor effects of PF
To examine the role of Skp2 in glioma in greater detail, RNA interference was carried out to suppress Skp2 expression in U87 and U251 cells. The cells were transfected with Skp2 siRNA and then treated with PF for 24 h. The growth rate decreased (Fig. 6A) whereas apoptosis was increased in U87 cells upon Skp2 knockdown (Fig. 6B), indicating that Skp2deficiency increases the sensitivity of the cells to PF. We next investigated whether Skp2 is involved in the regulation of U87 and U251 cell invasion. The inhibitory effects of PF on glioma cell invasion were enhanced in cells transfected with Skp2 siRNA as compared to those treated with PF or Skp2 siRNA only (Fig. 6C and D). We also observed that Skp2 expression was suppressed and P21 expression was increased to a greater degree in Skp2-depleted cells treated with PF as compared to those subjected to either treatment alone (Fig. 6E and F).
Figure 6.
Effect of Skp2 depletion on glioma cell growth, apoptosis and invasion. (A) Growth of glioma cells treated with PF and transfected with Skp2 siRNA was evaluated with CCK-8. Control, sicontrol; siRNA, Skp2 siRNA; Both, Skp2 siRNA + PF. *P<0.05 vs. control. #P<0.05 vs. either PF treatment or Skp2 siRNA transfection alone. (B) Left panel, apoptosis of U87 glioma cells analyzed by flow cytometry after Skp2 depletion and PF treatment. Right panel, quantitative analysis of results shown in the left panel. (C) Cell invasion was evaluated with the Transwell assay after Skp2 overexpression and PF treatment. (D) Quantitative analysis of results shown in (D). *P<0.05 vs. control. (E) Protein levels of Skp2 and its target P21 as determined by western blotting in glioma cells transfected with Skp2 siRNA and treated with PF. (F) Quantitative analysis of results shown in (E).
PF suppresses the growth of glioma-derived tumors in a mouse xenograft model
We established a U87 cell mouse xenograft model to evaluate the in vivo effects of PF. Tumor volume was lower in PF-treated as compared to control mice (P<0.05; Fig. 7), whereas no difference in body weight was observed between the two groups. Consistent with our in vitro observations, Skp2 and p-AKT levels were lower while that of P21 was higher in the tumor tissue of mice treated with PF relative to that of control animals.
Figure 7.
Antitumor effects of PF in a xenograft model. (A) Images of U87 cell-derived tumors from nude mice treated with PF or saline (n=5/group). (B) Body weight of mice monitored three times per week starting from the time of PF treatment. (C) Tumor size was measured with caliper three times per week starting from the time of PF treatment. (n=5/group). (D) Skp2, P21, and p-AKT expression in the tumors, as determined by western blotting. *P<0.05 vs. saline group.
Discussion
In the present study, we found that PF induced apoptosis and inhibited the proliferation, migration, and invasion of glioma cells. Moreover, we showed that PF exerts its antitumor effects in part by inhibiting Skp2 expression, since Skp2 overexpression restored whereas Skp2 knockdown enhanced these effects. Cell proliferation was enhanced in both U87 and U251 cell lines by overexpression of Skp2 (Fig. 4A), which also rescued the inhibition of cell growth resulting from PF treatment. On the other hand, Skp2 knockdown enhanced cell growth inhibition by PF (Fig. 6A). Similar effects were observed in the cell invasion (Figs. 4C and D and 6C and D) and migration (Fig. 5A) assays.There is increasing evidence to suggest that Skp2 plays a critical role in glioma development and progression (5,30,35,36). Skp2 expression is diffuse or focal in most cases of glioblastoma (GBM), but is absent or expressed at a low level in well-differentiated astrocytomas (35). Survival in primary GBM patients was negatively correlated with Skp2 expression level in the tumor (30); a similar relationship has been observed in other tumor types such as nasopharyngeal carcinoma (37). Skp2 deficiency induces apoptosis and inhibits growth in T98G cells (36). Accordingly, we found that Skp2 knockdown caused apoptosis and growth arrest in U87glioma cells. Skp2 overexpression has been shown to promote cancer progression and metastasis (38); indeed, we observed that Skp2 overexpression stimulated the growth, migration, and invasion of glioma cells whereas downregulation of Skp2 had the opposite effect, which is supported by a recent study (5).Given its importance in tumor progression, inactivation of Skp2 is a potential strategy for glioma treatment (21,39). Skp2 knockout mice are viable and fertile (40), suggesting that Skp2 inhibition is safe. Inhibition of the Skp2-SCF complex resulted in tumor regression in preclinical studies (32). Oncostatin M suppressed the proliferation of GBM cells via downregulation of the Skp2/Cyclin-dependent kinase regulatory subunit 1 E3 ligase complex while increasing the expression of P21 and P27 (41). In this study, we found that PF treatment decreased Skp2 and increased P21 and P27 levels in U87 and U251glioma cells. Additionally, the Skp2 inhibitor Compound #25 not only blocked Skp2-mediated Akt ubiquitination, but also decreased the self-renewal capacity of cancer stem cell populations (33). Since cancer stem cells are responsible for GBM initiation and maintenance as well as chemoresistance and tumor relapse (42–44), we propose that Skp2 inhibitors have clinical value for treatment of glioma. Notably, lovastatin was found to suppress the growth of cancer cells by inducing the degradation of Skp2 (45), and a recent study reported that the matrine derivative YF-18 inhibited the proliferation and migration of lung cancer cells via Skp2 suppression (46). Given that these inhibitors have side-effects, natural agents may be a safer approach for glioma treatment. In fact, agents such as longikaurin A (47), caffeic acid phenethyl ester, curcumin (5,48) and rottlerin (49,50) have shown antitumor effects that are exerted via suppression of Skp2. This study demonstrates that PF has similar clinical potential.To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report demonstrating that PF exerts an antitumor effect via downregulation of Skp2. PF inhibited the expression of Skp2 as well as its target genes P21 and p-AKT. AKT promotes Skp2 phosphorylation at serine 72, resulting in its translocation to the cytoplasm and activation of its oncogenic function (34,51). Notably, Skp2 was shown to regulate AKT ubiquitination in breast cancer and activate AKT in glioma cells (5), which is in agreement with our results. We previously reported that PF suppressed the expression of STAT3, which is known to regulate Skp2 expression in cancer cells (52–54). We speculate that PF inhibits Skp2 expression via negative regulation of STAT3, although further investigation is needed to evaluate this possibility.Our results indicate that PF also has therapeutic effects in a gliomaU87 cell xenograft mouse model. The fact that PF treatment had no effect on body weight suggests that it is a safe treatment for gliomapatients. Consistent with our in vitro data, Skp2 and p-AKT levels were reduced whereas that of p21 was increased in tumor tissue upon PF treatment. Unlike drugs for other cancers, those used to treat glioma must also pass through the blood-brain barrier. It was previously reported that PF crosses the blood-brain barrier in rats (55), underscoring its potential as an effective treatment for glioma.
Authors: K Nakayama; H Nagahama; Y A Minamishima; M Matsumoto; I Nakamichi; K Kitagawa; M Shirane; R Tsunematsu; T Tsukiyama; N Ishida; M Kitagawa; K Nakayama; S Hatakeyama Journal: EMBO J Date: 2000-05-02 Impact factor: 11.598
Authors: Tao Chen; Li-Xin Fu; Li-Wen Zhang; Bin Yin; Pei-Mei Zhou; Na Cao; Yong-Hong Lu Journal: Can J Physiol Pharmacol Date: 2016-03-10 Impact factor: 2.273
Authors: Jian Chen; Yanjiao Li; Tzong-Shiue Yu; Renée M McKay; Dennis K Burns; Steven G Kernie; Luis F Parada Journal: Nature Date: 2012-08-23 Impact factor: 49.962