Literature DB >> 29285343

Non-invasive assessment of patient-specific aortic haemodynamics from four-dimensional flow MRI data.

Lucian Itu1,2, Dominik Neumann3, Viorel Mihalef4, Felix Meister3, Martin Kramer3, Mehmet Gulsun4, Marcus Kelm5, Titus Kühne5, Puneet Sharma4.   

Abstract

We introduce a parameter estimation framework for automatically and robustly personalizing aortic haemodynamic computations from four-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging data. The framework is based on a reduced-order multiscale fluid-structure interaction blood flow model, and on two calibration procedures. First, Windkessel parameters of the outlet boundary conditions are personalized by solving a system of nonlinear equations. Second, the regional mechanical wall properties of the aorta are personalized by employing a nonlinear least-squares minimization method. The two calibration procedures are run sequentially and iteratively until both procedures have converged. The parameter estimation framework was successfully evaluated on 15 datasets from patients with aortic valve disease. On average, only 1.27 ± 0.96 and 7.07 ± 1.44 iterations were required to personalize the outlet boundary conditions and the regional mechanical wall properties, respectively. Overall, the computational model was in close agreement with the clinical measurements used as objectives (pressures, flow rates, cross-sectional areas), with a maximum error of less than 1%. Given its level of automation, robustness and the short execution time (6.2 ± 1.2 min on a standard hardware configuration), the framework is potentially well suited for a clinical setting.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Windkessel; fluid–structure interaction; haemodynamics; parameter estimation; reduced-order blood flow model; regional mechanical wall properties

Year:  2017        PMID: 29285343      PMCID: PMC5740219          DOI: 10.1098/rsfs.2017.0006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interface Focus        ISSN: 2042-8898            Impact factor:   3.906


  27 in total

1.  Numerical simulation and experimental validation of blood flow in arteries with structured-tree outflow conditions.

Authors:  M S Olufsen; C S Peskin; W Y Kim; E M Pedersen; A Nadim; J Larsen
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  Tuning multidomain hemodynamic simulations to match physiological measurements.

Authors:  Ryan L Spilker; Charles A Taylor
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  Graphics processing unit accelerated one-dimensional blood flow computation in the human arterial tree.

Authors:  Lucian Itu; Puneet Sharma; Ali Kamen; Constantin Suciu; Dorin Comaniciu
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 2.747

4.  Determination of wave speed and wave separation in the arteries using diameter and velocity.

Authors:  J Feng; A W Khir
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  An improved baseline model for a human arterial network to study the impact of aneurysms on pressure-flow waveforms.

Authors:  K Low; R van Loon; I Sazonov; R L T Bevan; P Nithiarasu
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.747

6.  Evaluation of methods for estimation of total arterial compliance.

Authors:  N Stergiopulos; J J Meister; N Westerhof
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1995-04

7.  Non-invasive hemodynamic assessment of aortic coarctation: validation with in vivo measurements.

Authors:  Lucian Itu; Puneet Sharma; Kristóf Ralovich; Viorel Mihalef; Razvan Ionasec; Allen Everett; Richard Ringel; Ali Kamen; Dorin Comaniciu
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 8.  Hyperelastic modelling of arterial layers with distributed collagen fibre orientations.

Authors:  T Christian Gasser; Ray W Ogden; Gerhard A Holzapfel
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2006-02-22       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  Arterial stiffness and cardiovascular events: the Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  Gary F Mitchell; Shih-Jen Hwang; Ramachandran S Vasan; Martin G Larson; Michael J Pencina; Naomi M Hamburg; Joseph A Vita; Daniel Levy; Emelia J Benjamin
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Measuring aortic pulse wave velocity using high-field cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison of techniques.

Authors:  El-Sayed H Ibrahim; Kevin R Johnson; Alan B Miller; Jean M Shaffer; Richard D White
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 5.364

View more
  2 in total

1.  Estimating central blood pressure from aortic flow: development and assessment of algorithms.

Authors:  Jorge Mariscal-Harana; Peter H Charlton; Samuel Vennin; Jorge Aramburu; Mateusz Cezary Florkow; Arna van Engelen; Torben Schneider; Hubrecht de Bliek; Bram Ruijsink; Israel Valverde; Philipp Beerbaum; Heynric Grotenhuis; Marietta Charakida; Phil Chowienczyk; Spencer J Sherwin; Jordi Alastruey
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 4.733

2.  The effect of coarctation degrees on wall shear stress indices.

Authors:  Deniz Rafieianzab; Mohammad Amin Abazari; M Soltani; Mona Alimohammadi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.