Literature DB >> 29285341

Simulating a virtual population's sensitivity to salt and uninephrectomy.

John S Clemmer1, Robert L Hester1, W Andrew Pruett1.   

Abstract

Salt sensitivity, with or without concomitant hypertension, is associated with increased mortality. Reduced functional renal mass plays an important role in causing salt-sensitive hypertension for many individuals. Factors that are important in the condition of decreased renal mass and how they affect blood pressure (BP) or salt sensitivity are unclear. We used HumMod, an integrative mathematical model of human physiology, to create a heterogeneous population of 1000 virtual patients by randomly varying physiological parameters. We examined potential physiological mechanisms responsible for the change in BP in response to high-salt diet (8× change in salt intake for three weeks) with full kidney mass and again after the removal of one kidney in the same group of virtual patients. We used topological data analysis (TDA), a clustering algorithm tool, to analyse the large dataset and separate patient subpopulations. TDA distinguished five unique clusters of salt-sensitive individuals (more than 15 mmHg change in BP with increased salt). While these clusters had similar BP responses to salt, different collections of variables were responsible for their salt sensitivity, e.g. greater reductions in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) or impairments in the renin-angiotensin system. After simulating uninephrectomy in these virtual patients, the three most salt-sensitive clusters were associated with a blunted increase in renal blood flow (RBF) and higher increase in loop and distal sodium reabsorption when compared with the salt-resistant population. These data suggest that the suppression of sodium reabsorption and renin-angiotensin system is key for salt resistance, and RBF in addition to GFR may be an important factor when considering criteria for kidney donors. Here, we show that in our model of human physiology, different derangements result in the same phenotype. While these concepts are known in the experimental community, they were derived here by considering only the data obtained from our virtual experiments. These methodologies could potentially be used to discover patterns in patient sensitivity to dietary change or interventions and could be a revolutionary tool in personalizing medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hypertension; kidney; mathematical modelling; salt; salt sensitivity; topological data analysis

Year:  2017        PMID: 29285341      PMCID: PMC5740217          DOI: 10.1098/rsfs.2016.0134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interface Focus        ISSN: 2042-8898            Impact factor:   3.906


  35 in total

1.  Salt sensitivity, pulse pressure, and death in normal and hypertensive humans.

Authors:  M H Weinberger; N S Fineberg; S E Fineberg; M Weinberger
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 10.190

2.  Mechanisms of blood pressure salt sensitivity: new insights from mathematical modeling.

Authors:  John S Clemmer; W Andrew Pruett; Thomas G Coleman; John E Hall; Robert L Hester
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 3.619

Review 3.  Circulation: overall regulation.

Authors:  A C Guyton; T G Coleman; H J Granger
Journal:  Annu Rev Physiol       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 19.318

4.  Quantitative analysis of the pathophysiology of hypertension.

Authors:  A C Guyton; T G Coleman
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1969-05       Impact factor: 17.367

5.  Delineating psychological and biomedical profiles in a heterogeneous fibromyalgia population using cluster analysis.

Authors:  Barbara L Loevinger; Elizabeth A Shirtcliff; Daniel Muller; Carmen Alonso; Christopher L Coe
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 6.  Diuretic use in renal disease.

Authors:  Domenic A Sica
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 28.314

7.  Long-term consequences of live kidney donation follow-up in 93% of living kidney donors in a single transplant center.

Authors:  Jan Gossmann; Albina Wilhelm; Heinz-Georg Kachel; Jochen Jordan; Uli Sann; Helmut Geiger; Wolfgang Kramer; Ernst-Heinrich Scheuermann
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 8.086

8.  Comparison of survival probabilities for dialysis patients vs cadaveric renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  F K Port; R A Wolfe; E A Mauger; D P Berling; K Jiang
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-09-15       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 9.  Recommending salt intake reduction to the hypertensive patient: more than just lip service.

Authors:  Pasquale Strazzullo; Lanfranco D'Elia; Giulia Cairella; Luca Scalfi; Michele Schiano di Cola
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2012-06-01

Review 10.  Salt sensitivity of blood pressure in humans.

Authors:  M H Weinberger
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 10.190

View more
  5 in total

1.  Testing Computer Models Predicting Human Responses to a High-Salt Diet.

Authors:  Theodore W Kurtz; Stephen E DiCarlo; Michal Pravenec; Filip Ježek; Jan Šilar; Jiří Kofránek; R Curtis Morris
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 10.190

2.  The interaction on hypertension between family history and diabetes and other risk factors.

Authors:  An-le Li; Qian Peng; Yue-Qin Shao; Xiang Fang; Yi-Ying Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Impact of sex and pathophysiology on optimal drug choice in hypertensive rats: quantitative insights for precision medicine.

Authors:  Sameed Ahmed; Jennifer C Sullivan; Anita T Layton
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-03-20

4.  In silico trial of baroreflex activation therapy for the treatment of obesity-induced hypertension.

Authors:  John S Clemmer; W Andrew Pruett; Robert L Hester
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  The Combination of Cell Cultured Technology and In Silico Model to Inform the Drug Development.

Authors:  Zhengying Zhou; Jinwei Zhu; Muhan Jiang; Lan Sang; Kun Hao; Hua He
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 6.321

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.