E El Haddad1, R Calcaterra2, G El Haddad1, V Candotto3, D Lauritano4. 1. Private practice, Turin, Italy. 2. Department of Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy. 3. Department of Morphology, Surgery and Experimental Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy. 4. Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The surgical-orthodontic treatment of impacted maxillary canine (IMC) remains a challenge to today's clinicians. The aim of the present paper is to describe an unconventional treatment of IMC with insertion of implant into the retained canine and 3 years follow-up. CASE REPORT: A 55-year-old female patient attended to rehabilitate her maxillary left canine site. An unconventional approach was proposed to the patient. A large diameter tapered implant (Ø 5 × 18 mm) was inserted (Nobel Active, Kolten, Swisse). An immediate loading prosthetic rehabilitation was performed. After checking for implant stability the prosthetic steps were carried out and a single crown was delivered with Procera system. CONCLUSION: The patient was happy of this kind of single non-invasive session for treating IMC. At the 3-year control, the implant did not show any mobility or signs of peri-implantitis clinically or radiographically. In addiction patient was satisfied of aesthetic results.
PURPOSE: The surgical-orthodontic treatment of impacted maxillary canine (IMC) remains a challenge to today's clinicians. The aim of the present paper is to describe an unconventional treatment of IMC with insertion of implant into the retained canine and 3 years follow-up. CASE REPORT: A 55-year-old female patient attended to rehabilitate her maxillary left canine site. An unconventional approach was proposed to the patient. A large diameter tapered implant (Ø 5 × 18 mm) was inserted (Nobel Active, Kolten, Swisse). An immediate loading prosthetic rehabilitation was performed. After checking for implant stability the prosthetic steps were carried out and a single crown was delivered with Procera system. CONCLUSION: The patient was happy of this kind of single non-invasive session for treating IMC. At the 3-year control, the implant did not show any mobility or signs of peri-implantitis clinically or radiographically. In addiction patient was satisfied of aesthetic results.
Authors: L Scapoli; A Girardi; A Palmieri; M Martinelli; F Cura; D Lauritano; F Pezzetti; F Carinci Journal: J Biol Regul Homeost Agents Date: 2015 Jul-Sep Impact factor: 1.711
Authors: D Lauritano; A Avantaggiato; V Candotto; F Cura; R M Gaudio; L Scapoli; A Palmieri Journal: J Biol Regul Homeost Agents Date: 2015 Jul-Sep Impact factor: 1.711
Authors: L Scapoli; A Girardi; A Palmieri; M Martinelli; F Cura; D Lauritano; F Carinci Journal: J Biol Regul Homeost Agents Date: 2015 Jul-Sep Impact factor: 1.711
Authors: M A Lopez; M Andreasi Bassi; L Confalone; R M Gaudio; L Lombardo; D Lauritano Journal: J Biol Regul Homeost Agents Date: 2016 Apr-Jun Impact factor: 1.711
Authors: M A Lopez; M Andreasi Bassi; L Confalone; R M Gaudio; L Lombardo; D Lauritano Journal: J Biol Regul Homeost Agents Date: 2016 Apr-Jun Impact factor: 1.711
Authors: A Baj; G Trapella; D Lauritano; V Candotto; G E Mancini; A B Giannì Journal: J Biol Regul Homeost Agents Date: 2016 Apr-Jun Impact factor: 1.711
Authors: D Lauritano; C A Bignozzi; D Pazzi; A Palmieri; R M Gaudio; M Di Muzio; F Carinci Journal: J Biol Regul Homeost Agents Date: 2016 Apr-Jun Impact factor: 1.711
Authors: Karin Apaza-Bedoya; Mario Escobar; Gabriella Peñarrieta-Juanito; Bruno Henriques; Cesar Augusto Magalhães Benfatti Journal: J Indian Soc Periodontol Date: 2021-09-27