Fed Germano1, Fra Germano1, M Piro2, C Arcuri2, L Ottria3. 1. Private practice, Rome, Italy. 2. Department of Dentistry, "Ospedale S. Giovanni Calibita FBF", University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy - Chief: Prof. Claudio Arcuri. 3. Department of Clinical Science and Translational Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effectiveness and to describe a clinical protocol with digital CAD CAM chairside workflow for the rehabilitation of severely compromised and worn dentitions. METHODS: This article reports 4 consecutive cases, where a clinical digital chairside workflow is used for the rehabilitation of severely compromised and worn dentitions. Advantages and limitations of this method compared with the traditional prosthetic protocol are also described and discussed. RESULTS: With all four patients treated with this protocol, we obtained a good aesthetic and functional result, improvement in chewing function, loss of cold sensitivity, better preservation of most of the left hard tissue and a good level of satisfaction. In a two-year follow-up, all patients also maintained the condition obtained with prosthetic chairside rehabilitation, resulting in almost 100% cumulative survival rate. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, we can assert that the aforementioned restorative treatment with digital CAD/CAM chairside workflow represents a valid alternative to rehabilitate this kind of patients, because it is a safe, predictable and personalized procedure but also it seems easier, faster and cheaper than traditional protocols.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effectiveness and to describe a clinical protocol with digital CAD CAM chairside workflow for the rehabilitation of severely compromised and worn dentitions. METHODS: This article reports 4 consecutive cases, where a clinical digital chairside workflow is used for the rehabilitation of severely compromised and worn dentitions. Advantages and limitations of this method compared with the traditional prosthetic protocol are also described and discussed. RESULTS: With all four patients treated with this protocol, we obtained a good aesthetic and functional result, improvement in chewing function, loss of cold sensitivity, better preservation of most of the left hard tissue and a good level of satisfaction. In a two-year follow-up, all patients also maintained the condition obtained with prosthetic chairside rehabilitation, resulting in almost 100% cumulative survival rate. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, we can assert that the aforementioned restorative treatment with digital CAD/CAM chairside workflow represents a valid alternative to rehabilitate this kind of patients, because it is a safe, predictable and personalized procedure but also it seems easier, faster and cheaper than traditional protocols.