Literature DB >> 29285021

Discovering urinary bladder cancer risk variants: Status quo after almost ten years of genome-wide association studies.

Silvia Selinski1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 29285021      PMCID: PMC5735342          DOI: 10.17179/excli2017-1000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EXCLI J        ISSN: 1611-2156            Impact factor:   4.068


× No keyword cloud information.

About ten years ago Kiemeney and colleagues (2008[24]) published the first genome-wide association study (GWAS) discovering two novel single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) near MYC (rs9642880) and TP63 (rs710521) associated with urinary bladder cancer (UBC) risk. Meanwhile, further GWAS and candidate gene studies identified and confirmed a number of susceptibility variants for UBC (Selinski, 2012[37], 2013[38], 2014[39]; Dudek et al., 2013[4]; Selinski et al., 2013[41]; Golka et al., 2011[18]). Currently, fifteen genomic regions seem to play a major role in development of this disease (Table 1(Tab. 1); References in Table 1: Figueroa et al., 2014[8]; Figueroa et al., 2016[7]; Fu et al., 2012[9]; Garcia-Closas et al., 2011[12]; Garcia-Closas et al., 2013[11]; Golka et al., 2009[13]; Grotenhuis et al., 2014[20]; Kiemeney et al., 2008[24]; Kiemeney et al., 2010[23]; Lehmann et al., 2010[26]; Nørskov et al., 2011[29]; Rafnar et al., 2009[31]; Rafnar et al., 2011[33]; Rafnar et al., 2014[32]; Rothman et al., 2010[34]; Selinski et al., 2011[42]; Selinski et al., 2012[44]; Tang et al., 2012[45]; Wang et al., 2014[46]; Wu et al., 2009[47]). It can be assumed that almost all relevant polymorphisms have been discovered now. The most recent UBC GWAS of Figueroa et al. (2016[7]) required 15,058 cases and 286,270 controls to discover a further susceptibility region at 13q34 (MCF2L gene), including the Icelandic and the Dutch GWAS (Gudbjartsson et al., 2015[21]; Kiemeney et al., 2008[24]). The odds ratios of the most recent UBC risk SNPs are rather small, e.g. the MCF2L intron variant rs4907479, with the strongest signal in the 2016 fine-mapping study of Figueroa et al. (2016[7]) resulted in an odds ratio (OR) of 1.13.
Table 1

Currently confirmed polymorphisms that are associated with UBC risk, their association with bladder carcinogen exposure and prognosis (update of Selinski, 2014) according to Selinski (2014). Polymorphisms, associated genes and locations are printed in bold, risk alleles or genotypes are given in brackets.

Several UBC risk variants are particularly relevant in persons exposed to bladder carcinogens - mainly by tobacco smoke (Burger et al., 2013[1]; Garcia-Closas et al., 2005[10], 2011[12], 2013[11]; Selinski et al., 2013[41]; Moore et al., 2011[28]) but also by occupation and environment (Ebbinghaus et al., 2017[5]; Höhne et al., 2017[22]; Krech et al., 2017[25]; Lukas et al., 2017[27]; Carreón et al., 2014[2]; Golka et al., 2012[14], 2009[13], 2004[19], 2002[15], 1997[17], 1996[16]; Delclos and Lerner, 2008[3]; Ovsiannikov et al., 2012[30]; Rushton et al., 2012[35]). However, currently no particular variant that is only relevant in exposed persons could be identified and replicated in GWAS. In 2014, Figueroa et al. (2014[6]) identified two variants in a genome-wide smoking ⨯ SNP interaction study -rs1711973 (FOXF2) relevant for never smokers and rs12216499 (RSPH2-TAGAP-EZR) in ever smokers, but both could not be confirmed using a large replication series (Figueroa et al., 2016[7]). Nevertheless, interaction analyses and stratification regarding smoking habits and cancer invasiveness are promising future approaches to uncover further susceptibility variants that are relevant for particular subgroups of the UBC patients. A further challenge is a genome-wide search for variants associated with bladder cancer recurrence and progression. This requires a large number of UBC patients with follow-up of several years after first diagnosis. However, it can be assumed that variants relevant for UBC development are also associated with UBC recurrence. Recurrence of this tumor occurs in approximately half of the patients with a median recurrence-free time of almost one year. Selinski et al. (2017[43]) showed that the ultra-slow N-acetyltransferase 2 (NAT2) genotype was associated with a significant reduction of recurrence-free time (8.4 months) compared to rapid acetylators (11 months) and an increased recurrence risk (66 % vs. 50 %, OR=1.89, 95 % CI = 1.06-3.38). Effects were more pronounced in ultra-slow smokers (7.9 months, 73 %) indicating the relevance of gene-environment interaction also for prognosis. Correspondingly, Lukas et al. (2017[27]) showed in a series of 143 UBC cases with suspected occupational bladder cancer the importance of co-occurring susceptibility variants, particularly co-occurring GSTM1 negative and rs11892031[A/A] for UBC recurrence. They discovered that UBC cases with an elevated number of risk alleles had a significantly shorter median relapse-free time of 8 months compared to cases with few risk alleles. According to the different importance of several genetic variants depending on exposure to bladder carcinogens, e.g. GSTM1 and NAT2, different variant combinations seem to play a major role in smokers and never smokers (Selinski et al., 2017[40]; Schwender et al., 2012[36]. Recently, Selinski et al. (2017[40]) identified and replicated in a large multi-centric case-controls series (discovery series: 2969 cases / 3285 controls, replication series: 2080 cases / 2167 controls) four-variant combinations out of twelve well-known UBC risk variants. The highest odds ratios were found in never smokers with the best combination (rs1014971[AA] ⨯ rs1058396[AG,GG] ⨯ rs11892031[AA] ⨯ rs8102137[CC,CT]) resulting in an OR of 2.59 (95 % CI = 1.93-3.47; P = 1.87 ⨯ 10-10, frequency in never smoking cases: 25 %). Odds ratios of the best combinations found in smokers were clearly lower (current smokers: 1.56, former: 2.13, ever: 1.55) and different variant combinations were relevant, especially GSTM1, rs1058396 (SLC14A1) and rs11892031 (UGT1A) combinations in current and rs9642880 (MYC), rs1495741 (NAT2) and rs8102137 (CCNE1) combinations in former smokers (Selinski et al., 2017[40]).
  47 in total

1.  Large-scale whole-genome sequencing of the Icelandic population.

Authors:  Daniel F Gudbjartsson; Hannes Helgason; Sigurjon A Gudjonsson; Florian Zink; Asmundur Oddson; Arnaldur Gylfason; Soren Besenbacher; Gisli Magnusson; Bjarni V Halldorsson; Eirikur Hjartarson; Gunnar Th Sigurdsson; Simon N Stacey; Michael L Frigge; Hilma Holm; Jona Saemundsdottir; Hafdis Th Helgadottir; Hrefna Johannsdottir; Gunnlaugur Sigfusson; Gudmundur Thorgeirsson; Jon Th Sverrisson; Solveig Gretarsdottir; G Bragi Walters; Thorunn Rafnar; Bjarni Thjodleifsson; Einar S Bjornsson; Sigurdur Olafsson; Hildur Thorarinsdottir; Thora Steingrimsdottir; Thora S Gudmundsdottir; Asgeir Theodors; Jon G Jonasson; Asgeir Sigurdsson; Gyda Bjornsdottir; Jon J Jonsson; Olafur Thorarensen; Petur Ludvigsson; Hakon Gudbjartsson; Gudmundur I Eyjolfsson; Olof Sigurdardottir; Isleifur Olafsson; David O Arnar; Olafur Th Magnusson; Augustine Kong; Gisli Masson; Unnur Thorsteinsdottir; Agnar Helgason; Patrick Sulem; Kari Stefansson
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  Urinary bladder cancer risk variants: recent findings and new challenges of GWAS and confirmatory studies.

Authors:  Silvia Selinski
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 5.153

3.  Occupational bladder cancer: Polymorphisms of xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes, exposures, and prognosis.

Authors:  Cordula Lukas; Silvia Selinski; Hans-Martin Prager; Meinolf Blaszkewicz; Jan G Hengstler; Klaus Golka
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2017-07-11

4.  Urinary bladder cancer risk factors in an area of former coal, iron, and steel industries in Germany.

Authors:  Eugen Krech; Silvia Selinski; Meinolf Blaszkewicz; Hannah Bürger; Thura Kadhum; Jan G Hengstler; Michael C Truss; Klaus Golka
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2017-07-11

Review 5.  Epidemiology and risk factors of urothelial bladder cancer.

Authors:  Maximilian Burger; James W F Catto; Guido Dalbagni; H Barton Grossman; Harry Herr; Pierre Karakiewicz; Wassim Kassouf; Lambertus A Kiemeney; Carlo La Vecchia; Shahrokh Shariat; Yair Lotan
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 6.  The enhanced bladder cancer susceptibility of NAT2 slow acetylators towards aromatic amines: a review considering ethnic differences.

Authors:  Klaus Golka; Verena Prior; Meinolf Blaszkewicz; Hermann M Bolt
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2002-03-10       Impact factor: 4.372

Review 7.  Genetic variants in urinary bladder cancer: collective power of the "wimp SNPs".

Authors:  Klaus Golka; Silvia Selinski; Marie-Louise Lehmann; Meinolf Blaszkewicz; Rosemarie Marchan; Katja Ickstadt; Holger Schwender; Hermann M Bolt; Jan G Hengstler
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2011-03-05       Impact factor: 5.153

8.  Copy number variation in glutathione-S-transferase T1 and M1 predicts incidence and 5-year survival from prostate and bladder cancer, and incidence of corpus uteri cancer in the general population.

Authors:  M S Nørskov; R Frikke-Schmidt; S E Bojesen; B G Nordestgaard; S Loft; A Tybjærg-Hansen
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 3.550

Review 9.  Occupational risk factors.

Authors:  George L Delclos; Seth P Lerner
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl       Date:  2008-09

10.  Genome-wide interaction study of smoking and bladder cancer risk.

Authors:  Jonine D Figueroa; Summer S Han; Montserrat Garcia-Closas; Dalsu Baris; Eric J Jacobs; Manolis Kogevinas; Molly Schwenn; Nuria Malats; Alison Johnson; Mark P Purdue; Neil Caporaso; Maria Teresa Landi; Ludmila Prokunina-Olsson; Zhaoming Wang; Amy Hutchinson; Laurie Burdette; William Wheeler; Paolo Vineis; Afshan Siddiq; Victoria K Cortessis; Charles Kooperberg; Olivier Cussenot; Simone Benhamou; Jennifer Prescott; Stefano Porru; H Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita; Dimitrios Trichopoulos; Börje Ljungberg; Françoise Clavel-Chapelon; Elisabete Weiderpass; Vittorio Krogh; Miren Dorronsoro; Ruth Travis; Anne Tjønneland; Paul Brenan; Jenny Chang-Claude; Elio Riboli; David Conti; Manuela Gago-Dominguez; Mariana C Stern; Malcolm C Pike; David Van Den Berg; Jian-Min Yuan; Chancellor Hohensee; Rebecca Rodabough; Geraldine Cancel-Tassin; Morgan Roupret; Eva Comperat; Constance Chen; Immaculata De Vivo; Edward Giovannucci; David J Hunter; Peter Kraft; Sara Lindstrom; Angela Carta; Sofia Pavanello; Cecilia Arici; Giuseppe Mastrangelo; Margaret R Karagas; Alan Schned; Karla R Armenti; G M Monawar Hosain; Chris A Haiman; Joseph F Fraumeni; Stephen J Chanock; Nilanjan Chatterjee; Nathaniel Rothman; Debra T Silverman
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 4.944

View more
  6 in total

1.  Development of a custom next-generation sequencing panel for the determination of bladder cancer risk in a Tunisian cohort.

Authors:  Imen Hemissi; Sami Boussetta; Hamza Dallali; Faycel Hellal; Geoffroy Durand; Catherine Voegele; Haroun Ayed; Selim Zaghbib; Zeineb Naimi; Mouna Ayadi; Mohamed Chebil; James Mckay; Florence Le Calvez-Kelm; Slah Ouerhani
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.316

2.  Genetic variants in N6-methyladenosine are associated with bladder cancer risk in the Chinese population.

Authors:  Hanting Liu; Jingjing Gu; Yu Jin; Qi Yuan; Gaoxiang Ma; Mulong Du; Yuqiu Ge; Chao Qin; Qiang Lv; Guangbo Fu; Meilin Wang; Haiyan Chu; Lin Yuan; Zhengdong Zhang
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 5.153

3.  Association of Glutathione S-transferase gene polymorphism with bladder Cancer susceptibility.

Authors:  Tianbiao Zhou; Hong-Yan Li; Wei-Ji Xie; Zhiqing Zhong; Hongzhen Zhong; Zhi-Jun Lin
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  N6-methyladenosine-related single-nucleotide polymorphism analyses identify oncogene RNFT2 in bladder cancer.

Authors:  Jiancheng Lv; Qiang Song; Kexin Bai; Jie Han; Hao Yu; Kai Li; Juntao Zhuang; Xiao Yang; Haiwei Yang; Qiang Lu
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 6.429

5.  The impact of genetic variants in the CYP2C8 gene on bladder cancer susceptibility.

Authors:  Weixing Qu; Fuzhou Zhang; Yongyi Cheng; Jing Li; Jiancheng Zhou
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 6.055

6.  Highlight report: Occupational urinary bladder cancer.

Authors:  H M Bolt
Journal:  EXCLI J       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 4.068

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.