Literature DB >> 29284369

Bayesian Phase II optimization for time-to-event data based on historical information.

Anja Bertsche1,2, Frank Fleischer1, Jan Beyersmann2, Gerhard Nehmiz1.   

Abstract

After exploratory drug development, companies face the decision whether to initiate confirmatory trials based on limited efficacy information. This proof-of-concept decision is typically performed after a Phase II trial studying a novel treatment versus either placebo or an active comparator. The article aims to optimize the design of such a proof-of-concept trial with respect to decision making. We incorporate historical information and develop pre-specified decision criteria accounting for the uncertainty of the observed treatment effect. We optimize these criteria based on sensitivity and specificity, given the historical information. Specifically, time-to-event data are considered in a randomized 2-arm trial with additional prior information on the control treatment. The proof-of-concept criterion uses treatment effect size, rather than significance. Criteria are defined on the posterior distribution of the hazard ratio given the Phase II data and the historical control information. Event times are exponentially modeled within groups, allowing for group-specific conjugate prior-to-posterior calculation. While a non-informative prior is placed on the investigational treatment, the control prior is constructed via the meta-analytic-predictive approach. The design parameters including sample size and allocation ratio are then optimized, maximizing the probability of taking the right decision. The approach is illustrated with an example in lung cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayes; Go–NoGo decision; Proof-of-concept; meta-analytic-predictive prior distribution; operating characteristics; time-to-event

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29284369     DOI: 10.1177/0962280217747310

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res        ISSN: 0962-2802            Impact factor:   3.021


  2 in total

1.  Bayesian survival analysis for early detection of treatment effects in phase 3 clinical trials.

Authors:  Lucie Biard; Anne Bergeron; Vincent Lévy; Sylvie Chevret
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2021-01-09

2.  Bayesian sample size determination for diagnostic accuracy studies.

Authors:  Kevin J Wilson; S Faye Williamson; A Joy Allen; Cameron J Williams; Thomas P Hellyer; B Clare Lendrem
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2022-04-10       Impact factor: 2.497

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.