M F Sepulveda Caviedes1, B S Forbes2, T Pfau1. 1. Department of Clinical Science and Services and Structure and Motion Lab, The Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, UK. 2. Singapore Turf Club, Singapore, Singapore.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: With the view of implementing gait symmetry measurements in Thoroughbreds in training for early detection of injuries, repeatability of inertial measurement unit (IMU) gait parameters needs to be established. OBJECTIVES: To assess the variation of head and pelvis movement symmetry in Thoroughbreds in training. STUDY DESIGN: Repeated observations in horses in race training. METHODS: Daily and weekly repeat gait assessments were conducted in 14 Thoroughbreds equipped with IMUs on poll, sacrum and right (RTC) and left (LTC) tuber coxae. Gait was assessed in trot, in-hand, on a level concrete surface. Difference between vertical displacement minima and maxima and range of motion (ROM) were obtained. Ranges containing 50% (median), 75, 90 and 95% of absolute daily and weekly differences were calculated and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) calculated for daily and weekly repeats. RESULTS: Median absolute daily differences ranged from 4 to 7 mm and median weekly differences from 4 to 8 mm. 90% of daily differences were between 9 and 16 mm and 90% of weekly differences between 11 and 19 mm. ICC values were found on average across sensors and gait parameters as 0.73 (ranging from 0.40 to 0.92 across parameters) for daily repeats and as 0.65 (0.27 to 0.91) for weekly repeats. MAIN LIMITATIONS: Horses were of varying training and movement asymmetry levels, and no veterinary lameness examination was conducted. CONCLUSIONS: Daily and weekly repeat gait assessments in this group of Thoroughbreds in training show lower ICC values than previously reported from within-day repeats in horses during lameness examinations. We recommend conducting repeatability studies for specific groups of horses when planning long-term studies aiming at identifying horses at risk of injury.
BACKGROUND: With the view of implementing gait symmetry measurements in Thoroughbreds in training for early detection of injuries, repeatability of inertial measurement unit (IMU) gait parameters needs to be established. OBJECTIVES: To assess the variation of head and pelvis movement symmetry in Thoroughbreds in training. STUDY DESIGN: Repeated observations in horses in race training. METHODS: Daily and weekly repeat gait assessments were conducted in 14 Thoroughbreds equipped with IMUs on poll, sacrum and right (RTC) and left (LTC) tuber coxae. Gait was assessed in trot, in-hand, on a level concrete surface. Difference between vertical displacement minima and maxima and range of motion (ROM) were obtained. Ranges containing 50% (median), 75, 90 and 95% of absolute daily and weekly differences were calculated and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) calculated for daily and weekly repeats. RESULTS: Median absolute daily differences ranged from 4 to 7 mm and median weekly differences from 4 to 8 mm. 90% of daily differences were between 9 and 16 mm and 90% of weekly differences between 11 and 19 mm. ICC values were found on average across sensors and gait parameters as 0.73 (ranging from 0.40 to 0.92 across parameters) for daily repeats and as 0.65 (0.27 to 0.91) for weekly repeats. MAIN LIMITATIONS: Horses were of varying training and movement asymmetry levels, and no veterinary lameness examination was conducted. CONCLUSIONS: Daily and weekly repeat gait assessments in this group of Thoroughbreds in training show lower ICC values than previously reported from within-day repeats in horses during lameness examinations. We recommend conducting repeatability studies for specific groups of horses when planning long-term studies aiming at identifying horses at risk of injury.
Authors: Emma Persson-Sjodin; Elin Hernlund; Thilo Pfau; Pia Haubro Andersen; Karin Holm Forsström; Marie Rhodin Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-08-13 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Kate Horan; Kieran Kourdache; James Coburn; Peter Day; Henry Carnall; Dan Harborne; Liam Brinkley; Lucy Hammond; Sean Millard; Bryony Lancaster; Thilo Pfau Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-11-23 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: A M Hardeman; A Byström; L Roepstorff; J H Swagemakers; P R van Weeren; F M Serra Bragança Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-02-25 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Thilo Pfau; David M Bolt; Andrew Fiske-Jackson; Carolin Gerdes; Karl Hoenecke; Lucy Lynch; Melanie Perrier; Roger K W Smith Journal: Animals (Basel) Date: 2022-03-17 Impact factor: 2.752