Literature DB >> 2928399

The reversed venous arterialized nerve graft in digital nerve reconstruction across scarred beds.

E H Rose1, T A Kowalski, M S Norris.   

Abstract

Conventional nerve grafts in complex digital injuries often yield poor results, particularly when placed in traumatized or avascular beds. Vascularized nerve grafts offer an option; experimental evidence suggests superior axonal regeneration across scarred beds with vascularized nerve grafts. We previously described a vascularized graft based on the dorsalis pedis artery--deep peroneal nerve "system." Reluctance to sacrifice this major artery, combined with the recent description by Townsend and Taylor and Gu, et al, of "reversed venous" arterialized nerve grafts, spurred us on to investigate the deep peroneal nerve--dorsalis pedis venae comitantes system. Fourteen neurovenous grafts were used in scarred or poorly vascularized beds for digital nerve reconstruction in 10 patients over a 4-year period. Graft length averaged 4.4 cm; interval from injury was 1 to 17 months. Sensory parameters of return included average static two-point discrimination of 8.3 mm, moving two-point discrimination of 5.8 mm, and median Semmes-Weinstein monofilament appreciation of 2.83. Two patients received three vascularized grafts and three conventional grafts for adjacent nerve injuries in the same digit, serving as internal controls. In these patients, the vascularized nerve grafts returned mean static two-point discrimination values of 9.3 mm and moving two-point discrimination values of 6.7 mm. The conventional nerve grafts averaged static two-point discrimination of 14.3 mm and moving two-point discrimination values of 10.3 mm. These differences imply enhanced axonal regeneration through vascularized nerve grafts. These data suggest that the reversed neurovenous graft may be the procedure of choice in secondary reconstruction of digital nerves across scarred beds or following injuries with poor soft-tissue vascularity, especially in those patients with cold intolerance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2928399     DOI: 10.1097/00006534-198904000-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  5 in total

1.  Vascularized nerve grafts and vascularized fascia for upper extremity nerve reconstruction.

Authors:  Julia K Terzis; Vasileios K Kostopoulos
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2009-04-18

Review 2.  A Comprehensive Approach to Facial Reanimation: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Milosz Pinkiewicz; Karolina Dorobisz; Tomasz Zatoński
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 3.  Reconstruction of a long defect of the ulnar artery and nerve with an arterialized neurovenous free flap in a teenager: A case report and literature review.

Authors:  Diogo Casal; Diogo Pais; Eduarda Mota-Silva; Giovanni Pelliccia; Inês Iria; Paula A Videira; Maria Manuel Mendes; João Goyri-O'Neill; Maria Manuel Mouzinho
Journal:  Microsurgery       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 2.425

4.  Long-Term Outcomes of Digital Nerve Repair Accompanied by Digital Artery Injury in Flexor Zone 2.

Authors:  Gokce Yildiran; Mustafa Sutcu; Osman Akdag; Zekeriya Tosun
Journal:  Surg J (N Y)       Date:  2019-12-02

Review 5.  Evidence-Based Approach to Timing of Nerve Surgery: A Review.

Authors:  Brendan J MacKay; Cameron T Cox; Ian L Valerio; Jeffrey A Greenberg; Gregory M Buncke; Peter J Evans; Deana M Mercer; Desirae M McKee; Ivica Ducic
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 1.539

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.