| Literature DB >> 29281085 |
Marien Havé1, Thierry Balliau2, Betty Cottyn-Boitte1, Emeline Dérond1, Gwendal Cueff1, Fabienne Soulay1, Aurélia Lornac3, Pavel Reichman4, Nico Dissmeyer4, Jean-Christophe Avice3, Patrick Gallois5, Loïc Rajjou1, Michel Zivy2, Céline Masclaux-Daubresse1.
Abstract
Autophagy is essential for protein degradation, nutrient recycling, and nitrogen remobilization. Autophagy is induced during leaf ageing and in response to nitrogen starvation, and is known to play a fundamental role in nutrient recycling for remobilization and seed filling. Accordingly, ageing leaves of Arabidopsis autophagy mutants (atg) have been shown to over-accumulate proteins and peptides, possibly because of a reduced protein degradation capacity. Surprisingly, atg leaves also displayed higher protease activities. The work reported here aimed at identifying the nature of the proteases and protease activities that accumulated differentially (higher or lower) in the atg mutants. Protease identification was performed using shotgun LC-MS/MS proteome analyses and activity-based protein profiling (ABPP). The results showed that the chloroplast FTSH (FILAMENTATION TEMPERATURE SENSITIVE H) and DEG (DEGRADATION OF PERIPLASMIC PROTEINS) proteases and several extracellular serine proteases [subtilases (SBTs) and serine carboxypeptidase-like (SCPL) proteases] were less abundant in atg5 mutants. By contrast, proteasome-related proteins and cytosolic or vacuole cysteine proteases were more abundant in atg5 mutants. Rubisco degradation assays and ABPP showed that the activities of proteasome and papain-like cysteine protease were increased in atg5 mutants. Whether these proteases play a back-up role in nutrient recycling and remobilization in atg mutants or act to promote cell death is discussed in relation to their accumulation patterns in the atg5 mutant compared with the salicylic acid-depleted atg5/sid2 double-mutant, and in low nitrate compared with high nitrate conditions. Several of the proteins identified are indeed known as senescence- and stress-related proteases or as spontaneous cell-death triggering factors.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29281085 PMCID: PMC6037082 DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erx482
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Exp Bot ISSN: 0022-0957 Impact factor: 6.992
Fig. 1.
Autophagy-defective mutants accumulate proteins in their rosette leaves. Plants were cultivated under high- (a) or low- (b) nitrate conditions for 60 d. Total proteins (c) were extracted from rosette leaves using TCA/acetone and suspended in denaturing buffer. Values are means ±SD of three biological replicates. Significant differences from controls (i.e. atg5 versus Col, and atg5/sid2 versus sid2) are indicated: ***P<0.001 (ANOVA and Tukey’s post-hoc test for multiple comparisons). Three independent plant cultures showed similar results: only one representative sample is presented here.
List of the proteases with significantly increased accumulation in atg5 versus Col, and in atg5/sid2 versus sid2
| M (1) | Accession (TAIR10) | Name (2) | Catalytic class (3) | Predicted subcellular localization (4) | Fold-change (5) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||||||
| HN |
|
|
| ||||||
| Class 1 | XICs | AT4G38220 | AQI | Met | ER |
|
|
|
|
| XICs | AT2G27020 | PAG1 | Thr | 20S (CP α) |
|
|
|
| |
| XICs | AT2G24200 | LAP1 | Met | PM,C |
|
|
|
| |
| XICs | AT4G20850 | TPP2 | Ser | Pl |
|
|
|
| |
| XICs | AT5G35590 | PAA1 | Thr | 20S (CP α) |
|
|
|
| |
| XICs | AT4G31300 | PBA1 | Thr | 20S (CP β) |
|
|
|
| |
| XICs | AT3G22110 | PAC1 | Thr | 20S (CP α) |
|
|
|
| |
| Class 2 | XICs | AT2G05840 | PAA2 | Thr | 20S (CP α) | 1.28 |
|
|
|
| XICs | AT4G14800 | PBD2 | Thr | 20S (CP β) | 1.19 |
|
|
| |
| XICs | AT3G60820 | PBF1 | Thr | 20S (CP β) | 1.15 |
|
|
| |
| XICs | AT1G53750 | RPT1A | non-catalytic | 19S (RP base) | 1.25 |
|
|
| |
| Class 3 | XICs | AT3G05530 | RPT5A | non-catalytic | 19S (RP base) | 1.31 |
| 1.39 |
|
| XICs | AT4G17510 | UCH3 | Cys | C | 1.55 |
| 1.82 |
| |
| XICs | AT5G05780 | RPN8A | non-catalytic | 19S (RP lid) | 1.18 |
| 1.31 |
| |
| XICs | AT5G58290 | RPT3 | non-catalytic | 19S (RP base) | 1.08 |
| 1.38 |
| |
| XICs | AT5G10540 | TOP2 | Met | C,Pl | 1.05 |
| 1.44 |
| |
| XICs | AT1G21720 | PBC1 | Thr | 20S (CP β) | 1.33 |
| 1.41 |
| |
| XICs | AT1G56450 | PBG1 | Thr | 20S (CP β) | 1.18 |
| 1.21 |
| |
| XICs | AT5G42790 | PAF1 | Thr | 20S (CP α) | 1.41 |
| 1.14 |
| |
| XICs | AT4G01610 | CATHB3 | Cys | E,V | 1.13 |
| 0.85 |
| |
| XICs | AT1G47128 | RD21A | Cys | E,V | 0.91 |
| 0.74 |
| |
| SC | AT1G53850 | PAE1 | Thr | 20S (CP α) | 1.75 |
| 1.50 |
| |
| SC | AT5G45890 | SAG12 | Cys | V | 1.50 (+) |
| 1.00 (+) |
| |
| Class 4 | XICs | AT5G51070 | CLPD | Ser | Pl |
|
| 1.13 | 1.40 (+) |
| XICs | AT3G13235 | DDI1 | Asp | C |
|
| 1.21 | 1.21 | |
| XICs | AT1G79340 | AMC4 | Cys | PM,C |
|
| 1.28 | 1.36 | |
| XICs | AT1G50380 | _ | Ser | C |
|
| 1.13 | 1.08 | |
| Class 5 | XICs | AT3G51260 | PAD1 | Thr | 20S (CP α) | 1.58 |
| 1.72 | 1.79 |
| XICs | AT5G23540 | RPN11 | non-catalytic | 19S (RP lid) | 1.10 |
| 1.10 | 1.26 | |
| XICs | AT4G38630 | RPN10 | non-catalytic | 19S (RP lid) | 1.19 |
| 1.28 | 1.28 | |
| XICs | AT1G51710 | UBP6 | Cys | C | 1.13 |
| 1.06 | 1.05 | |
| SC | AT5G66140 | PAD2 | Thr | 20S (CP α) | 1.25 |
| 2.33 | 1.67 | |
| SC | AT4G30910 | LAP3 | Met | Pl | 0.89 |
| 1.20 | 1.45 | |
| XICs | AT4G39090 | RD19A | Cys | V,N | 1.15 |
| 0.96 | 1.56 | |
| XICs | AT5G43060 | RD21B | Cys | E,V | 0.99 (+) |
| 0.59 | 1.36 | |
| SC | AT5G10760 | AED1 | Asp | E | 1.80 (+) |
| 0.67 | 1.50 (+) | |
| Class 6 | SC | AT1G16470 | PAB1 | Thr | 20S (CP α) | 1.50 | 1.40 |
| 1.35 |
| SC | AT1G79210 | PAB2 | Thr | 20S (CP α) | 1.55 | 1.11 |
| 1.21 | |
| XICs | AT2G14260 | PIP | Ser | C,Pl | 1.18 | 1.23 |
| 1.24 | |
| Class 7 | XICs | AT5G23140 | CLPP2 | Ser | M | 0.93 | 2.42 | 0.86 |
|
| XICs | AT4G16190 | RD19C | Cys | E,V | 1.05 | 1.46 | 1.18 |
| |
| XICs | AT5G26860 | LON1 | Ser | M | 1.21 | 1.31 | 1.02 |
| |
| SC | AT3G14290 | PAE2 | Thr | 20S (CP α) | 1.40 | 1.33 | 1.42 |
| |
| Class 8 | XICs | AT3G20630 | UBP14 | Cys | C |
| 1.40 |
| 1.31 |
| Class 9 | XICs | AT2G41790 | PXM16 | Met | Pe |
| 1.29 | 1.43 | 1.11 |
| Class 10 | XICs | AT4G36760 | APP1 | Met | PM,C |
|
| 1.27 |
|
| Class 11 | XICs | AT5G36210 | _ | Ser | Pl |
| 1.24 |
|
|
Plants were grown under high- (HN) or low- (LN) nitrate conditions. (1) XICs or Spectral counting (SC) methods. (2) Protein names according to UniProt and TAIR. (3) Catalytic classes according to MEROPS: asp, aspartic proteases; cys, cysteine proteases; met, metallo-proteases; ser, serine proteases; thr, threonine proteases; non-catalytic, non-catalytic proteasome regulatory sub-units. (4) Predicted subcellular localizations according to SUBA3 (SUBAcon), Bio-Analytic Ressource for Plant Biology (Cell eFP Viewer) and Marshall . 20S (CP α), proteasome 20S core protease α; 20S (CP β), proteasome 20S core protease β; 19S (RP base), proteasome 19S regulatory particle base; 19S (RP lid), proteasome 19S regulatory particle lid; C, cytosol; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; E, extracellular; M, mitochondrion; Pe, peroxisome; PM, plasma membrane; Pl, plastid; V, vacuole. (5) Fold-change ratios were calculated by dividing protein abundance in atg5 and atg5/sid2 by protein abundance in Col and in sid2, respectively. Entries in bold represent significantly increased accumulations, all other entries are non-significant changes (n = 3; P<0.05; ANOVA and Tukey’s post-hoc test for multiple comparisons). (+) significant increase in gene expression (Log2 fold-change of mRNA levels >1.2 with P-value <10–5, rank product and FDR estimation).
List of the proteases with significantly decreased accumulation in atg5 versus Col, and atg5/sid2 versus sid2
| M (1) | Accession (TAIR10) | Name (2) | Catalytic class (3) | Predicted subcellular localization (4) | Fold-change (5) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||||||
| HN |
|
|
| ||||||
| Class 1 | XICs | AT1G50250 | FTSH1 | met | Pl |
|
|
|
|
| XICs | AT5G42270 | FTSH5 | met | Pl |
|
|
|
| |
| XICs | AT4G36195 | _ | ser | V,PM |
|
|
|
| |
| Class 2 | XICs | AT1G09750 | AED3 | asp | E | 0.78 |
|
|
|
| XICs | AT3G54400 | _ | asp | E,Pl | 0.77 |
|
|
| |
| Class 3 | XICs | AT3G02110 | SCPL25 | ser | E |
|
| 0.70 |
|
| XICs | AT2G39850 | SBT4.1 | ser | E |
|
| 0.78 |
| |
| XICs | AT1G52510 | _ | Ser | Pl |
|
| 0.81 |
| |
| XICs | AT2G47940 | DEGP2 | Ser | Pl |
|
| 0.81 |
| |
| XICs | AT2G35780 | SCPL26 | Ser | V,E |
|
| 0.74 |
| |
| XICs | AT5G39830 | DEGP8 | Ser | Pl |
|
| 0.75 |
| |
| XICs | AT3G27925 | DEGP1 | Ser | Pl |
|
| 0.77 |
| |
| XICs | AT3G14067 | SASP | Ser | E |
|
| 0.88 |
| |
| XICs | AT3G19170 | PREP1 | met | Pl |
|
| 0.84 |
| |
| Class 4 | XICs | AT5G42390 | SPP | met | Pl | 0.81 |
| 0.75 |
|
| XICs | AT3G24590 | PLSP1 | Ser | Pl | 0.69 |
| 0.75 |
| |
| XICs | AT1G13270 | MAP1C | met | Pl | 0.70 |
| 0.71 |
| |
| XICs | AT5G05740 | EGY2 | met | Pl | 0.78 |
| 0.85 |
| |
| XICs | AT2G30950 | FTSH2 | met | Pl | 0.75 |
| 0.68 |
| |
| XICs | AT4G18370 | DEGP5 | Ser | Pl | 0.66 |
| 0.83 |
| |
| XICs | AT3G52500 | _ | Asp | E | 0.82 |
| 0.77 |
| |
| XICs | AT5G42240 | SCPL42 | Ser | E | 0.86 |
| 0.87 |
| |
| XICs | AT1G06430 | FTSH8 | met | Pl | 0.77 |
| 0.74 |
| |
| XICs | AT5G23210 | SCPL34 | Ser | E | 0.86 |
| 0.87 |
| |
| XICs | AT3G05350 | _ | met | Pl | 0.83 |
| 0.88 |
| |
| XICs | AT5G65760 | _ | Ser | Pl,V | 0.86 |
| 0.93 |
| |
| Class 5 | XICs | AT1G67700 | HHL1 | met | Pl | 0.76 |
| 0.74 | 0.53 |
| XICs | AT3G61820 | _ | Asp | E | 0.84 |
| 0.72 | 0.65 | |
| XICs | AT1G01300 | APF2 | Asp | E,PM | 0.86 |
| 0.73 | 0.73 | |
| XICs | AT4G34980 | SLP2 | Ser | E | 0.81 |
| 0.87 | 1.16 | |
| XICs | AT2G05920 | SBT1.8 | Ser | E,PM | 0.82 |
| 0.71 | 0.77 | |
| Class 6 | XICs | AT3G18490 | ASPG1 | Asp | E | 0.93 | 0.81 | 0.85 |
|
| XICs | AT2G33530 | SCPL46 | Ser | E | 1.22 | 0.97 | 0.89 |
| |
| XICs | AT4G21650 | SBT3.13 | Ser | E | 0.71 | 0.55 (–) | 0.69 |
| |
| Class 7 | XICs | AT5G08260 | SCPL35 | Ser | E | 0.90 | 0.83 |
|
|
| Class 8 | XICs | AT1G09130 | CLPR3 | Ser | Pl | 0.78 | 1.00 |
| 0.91 |
Plants were grown under high- (HN) or low- (LN) nitrate conditions. (1) Method for proteome analysis was XICs. (2) Protein names according to UniProt and TAIR. (3) Catalytic classes according to MEROPS: asp, aspartic proteases; met, metallo-proteases; ser, serine proteases. (4) Predicted subcellular localizations according to SUBA3 (SUBAcon) and Bio-Analytic Ressource for Plant Biology (Cell eFP Viewer). E, extracellular; PM, plasma membrane; Pl, plastid; V, vacuole. (5) Fold-change ratios were calculated by dividing protein abundance in atg5 and in atg5/sid2 by protein abundance in Col and in sid2, respectively. Entries in bold represent significantly decreased accumulations, all other entries are non-significant changes (n = 3; P<0.05; ANOVA and Tukey’s post-hoc test for multiple comparisons). (–) significant decrease in gene expression (Log2 fold-change of mRNA levels < –1.2 with P-value <10–5, rank product and FDR estimation).
Fig. 2.Predicted localization and catalytic classes of the proteases and proteasome sub-units in the autophagy-defective lines with significantly increased (up) or decreased (down) accumulation. Plants were grown under low- (LN) or high- (HN) nitrate conditions. Proteases and proteasome sub-units with significantly increased or decreased accumulation in atg5 versus Col and/or atg5/sid2 versus sid2 under LN or HN, or both LN and HN are presented. The numbers of proteins considered for the percentage calculation are indicated in brackets. Significant differences were determined by ANOVA and Tukey’s post-hoc test for multiple comparisons (P<0.05, n=3). (a) Predicted subcellular localization of the increased and decreased proteases in the autophagy-defective lines using SUBAcon (SUBA3 database) and Cell eFP Viewer (Bio-Analytic Ressource for Plant Biology). Only catalytic proteasome sub-units (CPβ) are taken into account here. (b) A total of 22 20S core-protease (CP) and 19S regulatory-particle (RP) sub-units were increased in the autophagy-defective lines: The diagram represents their proportions. (c) Catalytic classes of the increased and decreased proteases in the autophagy-defective lines identified using the MEROPS database. Only the CP β sub-units of proteasome were considered here as active proteases.
Fig. 3.Venn diagrams of the proteases and proteasome sub-units with significantly increased (up) and decreased (down) accumulation in the autophagy-defective lines. Comparisons of atg5 versus Col (black lines) and atg5/sid2 versus sid2 (grey lines) were performed on plants grown under low- (LN) or high- (HN) nitrate conditions. The number of proteins is indicated in brackets. Significant differences were determined by ANOVA and Tukey’s post-hoc test for multiple comparisons (P<0.05, n=3).
Fig. 4.
Proteasome activity is higher in autophagy-defective lines. Autophagy-defective lines (atg5 and atg5/sid2) and their respective controls (Col and sid2) were cultivated under high- (HN) or low-(LN) nitrate conditions for 60 d. Soluble proteins were extracted from rosette leaves using water and labelled with MVB072 at pH 7.5 to detect proteasome activity. Proteasome activity (a) was determined by detecting the MVB072-specific fluorescence after separating 10 µg of proteins by SDS-PAGE. The β1, β2, and β5 catalytic sub-units are indicated by arrows. (b) The same SDS-PAGE gel was stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue (CBB) to check for equal protein input. The Rubisco large sub-unit (RBCL) is indicated by an arrow. The fluorescence intensity (c) representative of the proteasome activity was quantified using Image Quant. Proteasome activity was measured on six biological repeats from two independent cultures. Means ±SD are shown (n=6) and significant differences between the autophagy-defective lines and the controls (i.e. atg5 versus Col, and atg5/sid2 versus sid2) are indicated: **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 (ANOVA and Tukey’s post-hoc test for multiple comparisons). The gels presented in this figure are representative of six biological replicates.
Fig. 5.
Activities of papain-like cysteine proteases (PLCPs) are higher in autophagy-defective lines grown under low-nitrate conditions. Autophagy-defective lines (atg5 and atg5/sid2) and their respective controls (Col and sid2) were cultivated under high- (HN) or low- (LN) nitrate conditions for 60 d. (a) Active PLCPs labelled with DCG-04 at pH 5.5 (arrows) were detected using streptavidin-HRP chemiluminescence. (b) The same total amount of input proteins was loaded on each lane after incubation, as shown by the Coomassie Brilliant Blue (CBB)-stained gel. The Rubisco large sub-unit (RBCL) is indicated by an arrow. (c) The chemiluminescence signal intensity representative of the total PLCP activities was quantified using Image Quant. Activities of PLCPs were measured on three biological repeats. Means and ±SD are shown (n=3) and significant differences between the autophagy-defective lines and the controls (i.e. atg5 versus Col, and sid2atg5 versus sid2) are shown: ***P<0.001 (ANOVA and Tukey’s post-hoc test for multiple comparisons). The gels presented in this figure are representative of three biological replicates. Determination of PLCP activities was repeated on samples from two independent cultures, showing similar results.
Fig. 6.Identification of the active papain-like cysteine proteases (PLCPs) accumulated in autophagy-defective lines. Autophagy defective lines (atg5 and atg5/sid2) and their respective controls (Col and sid2) were cultivated under low- (LN) nitrate conditions for 60 d. Soluble proteins from two biological replicates were extracted and labelled with DCG-04 at pH 5.5. Purified DCG-04-labelled proteins after pull-down for each genotype were separated on 12% SDS-PAGE gels and stained with silver nitrate (a); two replicates, rep1 and rep2, are shown. Proteins of molecular size between 40 and 25 kDa were excised from the gel (five bands) and analysed by LC-MS/MS. Ten active PLCPs were identified in all the genotypes and the two biological replicates. The total spectral counts obtained for each PLCPs are presented in (b) and (c). Similar results were obtained with the two replicates. Spectral counts in all the different excised bands presented in (a) are given in Supplementary Table S1.
Fig. 7.Identification of the mature and immature forms of papain-like cysteine proteases (PLCPs) using western blots. Autophagy-defective lines (atg5 and atg5/sid2) and their respective controls (Col and sid2) were cultivated under high- (HN) or low- (LN) nitrate conditions for 60 d. Total proteins were extracted from rosette leaves using denaturing buffer. Proteins (5 µg) were separated on 12% SDS-PAGE gels and detected on protein blots using RD21A-, CATHB3-, and SAG12-specific antibodies. Arrows indicate the different PLCP forms: intermediate (i) and mature (m, m1, m2) for SAG12 and RD21A; immature pro-enzyme (i), intermediate form with C-terminal domain processed (ΔC), mature form (M), and short mature form (m) of CATHB3. Equal amounts of proteins were loaded in each lane, as shown by the Coomassie Brilliant Blue (CBB)-stained blot, on which the Rubisco large sub-unit (RBCL) is indicated by an arrow.
List of protease inhibitors differentially accumulated in atg5 versus Col, and atg5/sid2 versus sid2
| Accession (TAIR10) | Name (1) | Description (2) | Predicted subcellular localization (3) | Fold-change (4) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||||
| HN |
|
|
| ||||
| AT1G21750 | PDIL1-1/PDI5 | protein disulfide isomerase | ER |
|
|
|
|
| AT1G47710 | SERPIN-1 | ser-protease inhibitor | C |
|
| 1.11 | 1.13 |
| AT4G16500 | CYS4 | cys-protease inhibitor | E | 0.92 | 0.77 | 0.77 |
|
Plants were grown under high- (HN) or low- (LN) nitrate conditions. (1) Protein names according to UniProt and TAIR. (2) Description (TAIR10). (3) Predicted subcellular localizations according to SUBA3 (SUBAcon) and Bio-Analytic Ressource for Plant Biology (Cell eFP Viewer). C, cytosol; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; E, extracellular. (4) Fold-change ratios were calculated by dividing protein abundance in atg5 and atg5/sid2 by protein abundance in Col and sid2, respectively. Entries in bold cells represent significantly increased or decreased accumulations, all other entries are non-significant changes (n = 3; P<0.05; ANOVA and Tukey’s post-hoc test for multiple comparisons).
Fig. 8.Schematic representation of the different proteases and protease-related proteins differentially accumulated in autophagy mutants and of their predicted cellular localization. The proteases with increased accumulation in atg are shown in red while those with decreased accumulation are shown in blue.