Motivation: The ability to produce and analyze whole genome sequencing (WGS) data from samples with structural variations (SV) generated the need to visualize such abnormalities in simplified plots. Conventional two-dimensional representations of WGS data frequently use either circular or linear layouts. There are several diverse advantages regarding both these representations, but their major disadvantage is that they do not use the two-dimensional space very efficiently. We propose a layout, termed the Genome U-Plot, which spreads the chromosomes on a two-dimensional surface and essentially quadruples the spatial resolution. We present the Genome U-Plot for producing clear and intuitive graphs that allows researchers to generate novel insights and hypotheses by visualizing SVs such as deletions, amplifications, and chromoanagenesis events. The main features of the Genome U-Plot are its layered layout, its high spatial resolution and its improved aesthetic qualities. We compare conventional visualization schemas with the Genome U-Plot using visualization metrics such as number of line crossings and crossing angle resolution measures. Based on our metrics, we improve the readability of the resulting graph by at least 2-fold, making apparent important features and making it easy to identify important genomic changes. Results: A whole genome visualization tool with high spatial resolution and improved aesthetic qualities. Availability and implementation: An implementation and documentation of the Genome U-Plot is publicly available at https://github.com/gaitat/GenomeUPlot. Contact: vasmatzis.george@mayo.edu. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Motivation: The ability to produce and analyze whole genome sequencing (WGS) data from samples with structural variations (SV) generated the need to visualize such abnormalities in simplified plots. Conventional two-dimensional representations of WGS data frequently use either circular or linear layouts. There are several diverse advantages regarding both these representations, but their major disadvantage is that they do not use the two-dimensional space very efficiently. We propose a layout, termed the Genome U-Plot, which spreads the chromosomes on a two-dimensional surface and essentially quadruples the spatial resolution. We present the Genome U-Plot for producing clear and intuitive graphs that allows researchers to generate novel insights and hypotheses by visualizing SVs such as deletions, amplifications, and chromoanagenesis events. The main features of the Genome U-Plot are its layered layout, its high spatial resolution and its improved aesthetic qualities. We compare conventional visualization schemas with the Genome U-Plot using visualization metrics such as number of line crossings and crossing angle resolution measures. Based on our metrics, we improve the readability of the resulting graph by at least 2-fold, making apparent important features and making it easy to identify important genomic changes. Results: A whole genome visualization tool with high spatial resolution and improved aesthetic qualities. Availability and implementation: An implementation and documentation of the Genome U-Plot is publicly available at https://github.com/gaitat/GenomeUPlot. Contact: vasmatzis.george@mayo.edu. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Authors: Aaron S Mansfield; Tobias Peikert; James B Smadbeck; Julia B M Udell; Enrique Garcia-Rivera; Laura Elsbernd; Courtney L Erskine; Virginia P Van Keulen; Farhad Kosari; Stephen J Murphy; Hongzheng Ren; Vishnu V Serla; Janet L Schaefer Klein; Giannoula Karagouga; Faye R Harris; Carlos Sosa; Sarah H Johnson; Wendy Nevala; Svetomir N Markovic; Aaron O Bungum; Eric S Edell; Haidong Dong; John C Cheville; Marie Christine Aubry; Jin Jen; George Vasmatzis Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2018-10-10 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Alaa Koleilat; James B Smadbeck; Cinthya J Zepeda-Mendoza; Cynthia M Williamson; Beth A Pitel; Crystal L Golden; Xinjie Xu; Patricia T Greipp; Rhett P Ketterling; Nicole L Hoppman; Jess F Peterson; Christine J Harrison; Yassmine M N Akkari; Karen D Tsuchiya; Mary Shago; Linda B Baughn Journal: Genes Chromosomes Cancer Date: 2022-07-19 Impact factor: 4.263
Authors: James B Smadbeck; Sarah H Johnson; Stephanie A Smoley; Athanasios Gaitatzes; Travis M Drucker; Roman M Zenka; Farhad Kosari; Stephen J Murphy; Nicole Hoppman; Umut Aypar; William R Sukov; Robert B Jenkins; Hutton M Kearney; Andrew L Feldman; George Vasmatzis Journal: Genes Chromosomes Cancer Date: 2018-07-30 Impact factor: 5.006
Authors: Alan H Bryce; Jan B Egan; James B Smadbeck; Sarah H Johnson; Stephen J Murphy; Faye R Harris; Geoffrey C Halling; Simone B S P Terra; John Cheville; Lance Pagliaro; Brad Leibovich; Brian A Costello; George Vasmatzis Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-03-05 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Neeraj Sharma; James B Smadbeck; Nadine Abdallah; Cinthya Zepeda-Mendoza; Moritz Binder; Kathryn E Pearce; Yan W Asmann; Jess F Peterson; Rhett P Ketterling; Patricia T Greipp; P Leif Bergsagel; S Vincent Rajkumar; Shaji K Kumar; Linda B Baughn Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2021-10-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Tommaso Grassi; Faye R Harris; James B Smadbeck; Stephen J Murphy; Matthew S Block; Francesco Multinu; Janet L Schaefer Klein; Piyan Zhang; Giannoula Karagouga; Minetta C Liu; Alyssa Larish; Maureen A Lemens; Marla Kay S Sommerfield; Serena Cappuccio; John C Cheville; George Vasmatzis; Andrea Mariani Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-06-10 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: George Vasmatzis; Xue Wang; James B Smadbeck; Stephen J Murphy; Katherine B Geiersbach; Sarah H Johnson; Athanasios G Gaitatzes; Yan W Asmann; Farhad Kosari; Mitesh J Borad; Daniel J Serie; Sarah A McLaughlin; Jennifer M Kachergus; Brian M Necela; E Aubrey Thompson Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2018-07-13 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Jennifer L Leiting; Stephen J Murphy; John R Bergquist; Matthew C Hernandez; Tommy Ivanics; Amro M Abdelrahman; Lin Yang; Isaac Lynch; James B Smadbeck; Sean P Cleary; David M Nagorney; Michael S Torbenson; Rondell P Graham; Lewis R Roberts; Gregory J Gores; Rory L Smoot; Mark J Truty Journal: JHEP Rep Date: 2020-01-16