| Literature DB >> 29280964 |
Zhengqi Shi1, Ahalapitiya H Jayatissa2.
Abstract
Commercial solar cells have a power conversion efficiency (PCE) in the raical">nge of 10-22% with different light absorbers.Entities:
Keywords: back contacts; efficiency; graphene; thin film solar cell; top contacts
Year: 2017 PMID: 29280964 PMCID: PMC5793534 DOI: 10.3390/ma11010036
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1(a) Atomic structure and (b) energy bands of graphene. The energy bands have been calculated by first-principles (black line) and the tight-binding models: green lines indicate calculation assuming (E0 = 0) and red lines indicate cone-like band structure with linear dispersion near Dirac points K and K’ [35].
Figure 2J-V plot of the graphene/n-Si diode on (a) linear and (b) semi-logarithmic scale in the dark and under illumination; (c) the graphene/n-Si interface at zero bias voltage. E, E, E, E, W, χ and Φ indicate conduction band, valence band, Fermi level, bandgap, graphene work function, Si electron affinity and Schottky barrier height, respectively [36].
Figure 3(a) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of a graphene incorporated CdTe film, insert figure was the top-view. (b) A schematic draw of 3D graphene-incorporated CdTe solar cell. (c) Band structure of the CdTe solar cell with graphene back contact. (d) J–V curve of CdTe solar cell with graphene back contact [39].
Device performances of the CdTe cells with four different back contacts [40]. This table contains conductivity (σ), carrier mobility (μ), open circuit voltage (Voc), short circuit current density (Jsc), fill factor (FF) and efficiency (Eff) for back contacts made with Cu thin films (Cu TFs) followed by a thick Ni layer, graphite or graphene paste containing Cu particles (Cu Ps, ≈75 μm in diameter) and copper nanowires (Cu NWs)/graphene.
| Back Contact Material | σ [S cm-1] | μ [cm2 V-1 s-1] | Voc [mV] | Jsc [mA cm-2] | FF [%] | Eff. [%] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cu NWs/Graphene | 16.7 | 16.2 | 801 | 22.4 | 67.4 | 12.1 |
| Cu Ps/Graphene | 14.2 | 13.2 | 805 | 21.3 | 68.1 | 11.7 |
| Cu Ps/Graphite | 5.5 | 5.0 | 790 | 21.2 | 62.5 | 10.5 |
| Cu TF | - | - | 740 | 21.1 | 58.0 | 9.1 |
Figure 4Current density versus voltage (J-V) characteristics of the graphene added devices with and without CdSe QDs under (a) AM1.5G illumination and (b) dark. The inset of (a) shows statistical results of devices with and without QDs. (c) External quantum efficiency (EQE) curves of the devices with and without CdSe QDs. (d) The absorption spectrum of the CdSe QDs [43].
Figure 5Schematic of multilayer arrangement in possible graphene-based CIGS device [48]. Graphene is incorporated at step-4 in all processes except standard process.
Graphene-composited copper indium gallium sulfide (CIGS) cell performance [48].
| Samples | TCE | Process [Thickness of i-ZnO] | Voc [mV] | Jsc [mA/cm2] | Fill Factor [%] | PCE [%] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | 150nm AZO | Reference [50 nm] | 601 | 32.8 | 74.3 | 14.9 |
| #2 | 1-layer G | Process A [50 nm] | 543 | 0.93 | 25.3 | 0.43 |
| #3 | 400nm PMMA/1-layer G | Process B [50 nm] | 595 | 23.5 | 40.4 | 5.63 |
| #4 | 400nm PMMA/4-layer G | Process B [50 nm] | 596 | 27.4 | 44.2 | 7.20 |
| #5 | 400nm PMMA/4-layer G | Process C [125 nm] | 595 | 31.2 | 56.3 | 10.5 |
| #6 | 400nm PMMA/4-layer G | Process C [200 nm] | 603 | 30.1 | 52.2 | 9.50 |
| #7 | 150nm PMMA/4-layer G | Process D [125 nm] | 601 | 32.4 | 69.1 | 13.5 |
Figure 6(a) Cross-sectional SEM image and (b) energy levels of the PSC with a graphene-TiO2 composite as the electron transport layer (ETL). (c) The series resistance of the perovskite solar cells (PSCs) with a graphene-TiO2 composite or TiO2 only as the ETL. (d) J-V characteristics of the PSCs with different electron collection layers under AM 1.5G and dark [60].
Figure 7J-V curve of rGO/ mesoporous-TiO2 nanocomposite based perovskite solar cell with varying rGO contents (0.2 vol %, 0.4 vol %, and 1.0 vol %). The black line stands for the reference cell with mesoporous-TiO2 nanolayers [62].
Figure 8(a) J–V characteristics and (b) EQE spectrum of the champion device with graphene/graphene oxide (GO) layer [65].
Device stability test results (1987 h) for both kinds of PSCs (perovskite solar cells) [68].
| HTM | Voc [V] | Jsc [mA cm−2] | FF [%] | PCE [%] | PCE Relative Variation [%] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spiro-OMeTAD As-Prepared | 1.02 | 15.70 | 68.78 | 11.06 | −41 |
| Spiro-OMeTAD 1987 h | 1.00 | 10.50 | 61.75 | 6.50 | |
| RGO As-Prepared | 0.91 | 8.95 | 59.78 | 4.87 | +36 |
| RGO 1987 h | 0.95 | 11.5 | 60.54 | 6.62 |
Figure 9(a) Best I−V curves of TSHBC (perthiolated trisulfur-annulated hexa-peri-hexabenzocoronene) and G/TSHBC-based cells and (b) Device stability test with AM1.5G under 45% humidity [69].
Figure 10PEDOT:PSS droplet contact angles on (a) as-prepared graphene, (b) graphene covered with 1 nm MoO3, (c) graphene covered with 2 nm MoO3, (d) as-prepared ITO, (e) UVO-treated ITO, (f) ITO covered with 1 nm MoO3 after UVO treatment. The insets in (a–c) showed the optical images of PEDOT:PSS/MAPbI3 films fabricated on the corresponding glass/graphene surfaces [74].
Device parameters of PSCs with graphene/MoO3 and indium-tin-oxides (ITO) electrodes [74].
| Sample ID | Electrode | MoO3 Thickness [nm] | Voc [V] | Jsc [mA cm-2] | FF | PCE [%] | Best PCE [%] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G-M1 | Graphene | 1 | 0.72 ± 0.36 | 17.6 ± 6.3 | 0.45 ± 0.09 | 6.7 ± 4.2 | 12.1 |
| G-M2 | 2 | 1.03 ± 0.02 | 21.9 ± 0.4 | 0.72 ± 0.02 | 16.1 ± 0.6 | 17.1 | |
| G-M4 | 4 | 1.00 ± 0.01 | 22.9 ± 0.4 | 0.70 ± 0.02 | 15.9 ± 0.5 | 16.2 | |
| ITO-M0 | ITO | 0 | 0.96 ± 0.01 | 21.4 ± 0.5 | 0.83 ± 0.02 | 17.0 ± 0.4 | 17.6 |
| ITO-M1 | 1 | 0.97 ± 0.01 | 22.6 ± 0.4 | 0.83 ± 0.01 | 18.2 ± 0.5 | 18.8 | |
| ITO-M2 | 2 | 0.95 ± 0.01 | 22.2 ± 0.4 | 0.76 ± 0.01 | 16.1 ± 0.4 | 16.9 | |
| ITO-M4 | 4 | 0.94 ± 0.01 | 21.0 ± 0.4 | 0.74 ± 0.01 | 14.7 ± 0.6 | 15.7 |
Figure 11(a) Normalized PCEs of the Gr-Mo/PEN and ITO/PEN devices measured after 1000 bending cycles with bending radius of flat, 6, 4, and 2 mm. (b) Normalized PCEs vs bending cycles at a bending radius of 4 mm for the Gr-Mo/PEN and ITO/PEN devices. The inset photograph shows the actual bending situation [75].
Findings and suggestions of graphene application on thin film solar cells.
| System | Front Contact | Back Contact | Absorber | ETL | HTL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CdTe | Thin-layer graphene (1–5 layers) | Multi-layer graphene with metal | - | - | - |
| CIGS or CZTS | 1–5 layer graphene, need extra surface treatment to decrease Rs | Multi-layer graphene with metal, need extra surface treatment to decrease Rs | - | Reduced-GO/TiO2 enhanced η. | - |
| PSC | Thin-layer graphene with interfacial layer for better wettability | Graphene or graphene with metal, need interfacial layer, thickness profile vary | Mix graphene from the initial synthesis | Low concentration with TiO2, mixed or separately coated | Need suitable interfacial layer to connect graphene and perovskite |