Literature DB >> 29280920

Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma within the Milan criteria versus the University of California San Francisco criteria: a comparative study.

Mohamed R Abdelfattah1,2, Hussein Elsiesy3, Hadeel Al-Manea4, Dieter C Broering1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Currently, liver transplantation (LT) for HCC is the only hope for cure from the tumor and from end-stage liver disease (ESLD). The organ pool shortage in deceased donor LT and the donor-related ethical concerns in living-donor LT necessitate the use of rigorous criteria for LT for HCC. In this respect, two main criteria for LT for HCC were implemented with good outcome, namely, the Milan and the University of California San Francisco criteria. Comparison of the outcome of LT for HCC using either of the two criteria has seldom been reported in the literature. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty-eight patients underwent LT between August 2003 and end of July 2013 for the presence of pathologically proven pure HCC lesions at our institution. Cases of pediatric LT or liver retransplantation were excluded from this study. Cases with mixed HCC and cholangiocarcinoma were excluded from this study.
RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients underwent LT between August 2003 and July 2013 for the presence of pathologically proven pure HCC lesions at our institution. The mean follow-up duration was 45±30.9 months. HCC recurrence was related significantly to the presence of vascular invasion and degree of differentiation of HCC lesion (P value of 0.0001 and 0.001, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Patient and tumor free survival did not differ significantly between patients within Milan or University of California San Francisco criteria or beyond both criteria. Vascular invasion and poor differentiation are still the most influential factors for post-transplant long-term outcomes in HCC patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29280920     DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 0954-691X            Impact factor:   2.566


  4 in total

1.  Saudi Association for the Study of Liver diseases and Transplantation practice guidelines on the diagnosis and management of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Saleh A Alqahtani; Faisal M Sanai; Ashwaq Alolayan; Faisal Abaalkhail; Hamad Alsuhaibani; Mazen Hassanain; Waleed Alhazzani; Abdullah Alsuhaibani; Abdullah Algarni; Alejandro Forner; Richard S Finn; Waleed K Al-Hamoudi
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.485

2.  International Society of Paediatric Surgical Oncology (IPSO) Surgical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Simone de Campos Vieira Abib; Chan Hon Chui; Sharon Cox; Abdelhafeez H Abdelhafeez; Israel Fernandez-Pineda; Ahmed Elgendy; Jonathan Karpelowsky; Pablo Lobos; Marc Wijnen; Jörg Fuchs; Andrea Hayes; Justin T Gerstle
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2022-02-17

3.  Callispheres® drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization might be an efficient and safety down-staging therapy in unresectable liver cancer patients.

Authors:  Ning Peng; Linfeng Mao; Yiwen Tao; Kaiyin Xiao; Guandou Yuan; Songqing He
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 3.253

4.  The ratio of preoperative alpha-fetoprotein level to total tumor volume as a prognostic factor of hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Tao Jiang; Xiao-Shi Zhang; Fei Pan; Shao-Cheng Lyu; Jing Wang; Meng-Xiu Huang; Qiang He; Ren Lang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 1.817

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.