Literature DB >> 29280859

Outcome Analysis of Free Flap Salvage in Outpatients Presenting with Microvascular Compromise.

Rene D Largo1, Jesse C Selber, Patrick B Garvey, Edward I Chang, Matthew M Hanasono, Peirong Yu, Charles E Butler, Donald P Baumann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Extensive flap salvage attempts are routinely performed in patients with late-onset flap vascular crisis despite low flap survival rates. A knowledge gap exists in management of compromised free flaps in patients who present with perfusion-related complications after hospital discharge.
METHODS: A retrospective review of 7443 free flaps used in 7128 cancer patients at a single institution from January of 2001 to March of 2015 was performed.
RESULTS: Of 7443 free flap reconstructions, 856 patients (12 percent) were taken back to the operating room. Also, 261 patients (4 percent) suffered from microvascular compromise, of whom 110 (1 percent) experienced total flap loss. The authors identified 17 patients (10 breast cancer patients and seven head and neck cancer patients) who had vascular flap compromise and underwent reoperation after hospital discharge (median, 10 days; range, 4 to 107 days) after free flap reconstruction. Of these 17 patients, nine breast cancer patients and two head and neck cancer patients underwent flap salvage attempts. Salvage procedures included thrombectomy, thrombolytic and heparin injections, and reanastomoses (11 patients); vein grafting (four patients); vein supercharging with cephalic turndown (two patients); and change of recipient vessels (two patients). Sixteen of the 17 patients (94 percent) experienced total flap loss, and one patient (6 percent) had partial flap loss requiring long-lasting wound treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient free flap salvage has a low success rate regardless of flap type, recipient site, or patient population. The authors' study suggests that immediate second-line reconstruction is more effective for late-onset flap vascular crisis than extensive flap salvage procedures. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29280859     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003917

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  6 in total

Review 1.  Management of postoperative microvascular compromise and ischemia reperfusion injury in breast reconstruction using autologous tissue transfer: Retrospective review of 2103 flaps.

Authors:  Michelle Coriddi; Paige Myers; Babak Mehrara; Jonas Nelson; Peter G Cordeiro; Joseph Disa; Evan Matros; Joseph Dayan; Robert Allen; Colleen McCarthy
Journal:  Microsurgery       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 2.425

2.  Outpatient Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Carlos A Martinez; Sean G Boutros
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-09-23

3.  Autologous Breast Reconstruction after Failed Implant-Based Reconstruction: Evaluation of Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes and Quality of Life.

Authors:  Michelle Coriddi; Deana Shenaq; Elizabeth Kenworthy; Jacques Mbabuike; Jonas Nelson; Andrea Pusic; Babak Mehrara; Joseph J Disa
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Successful Salvage of Delayed Venous Congestion After DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Kristopher Katira; Samita Goyal; Chelsea Venditto; John A LoGiudice; Erin L Doren
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2019-12-03

5.  Development and Evaluation of a Remote Patient Monitoring System in Autologous Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Stefan L M Hummelink; Vera A A Paulus; Eva C Wentink; Dietmar J O Ulrich
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-01-05

6.  Jaw reconstruction with vascularized fibular flap: The 11-year experience among 104 patients.

Authors:  Shengjie Shao; Weihong Wang; Biao Xu; Yu Liu; Zhe Zhang
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-02-29       Impact factor: 2.754

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.