C-H Lin1,2, H-S Lin3, S-C Lin1, C-C Kuo1, F-C Wang1, Y-H Huang1. 1. Kaohsiung Municipal Kai-Syuan Psychiatric Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. 2. Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. 3. Department of Health-Business Administration, Fooyin University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: PANSS-8 and PANSS-6 are derived from the 30-item Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS-30). We investigate whether PANSS-8 or PANSS-6 is a reliable, valid, sensitive to change measure, and scalable, and whether early improvement using them can predict response/remission. METHOD: Data were from 3 trials for 270 schizophrenia inpatients receivingantipsychotics. Internal consistency, validity, sensitivity to change, and scalability using PANSS-30, PANSS-8, and PANSS-6 at each assessment were examined. Early improvement was defined as at least 20% reduction of PANSS-30, PANSS-8, or PANSS-6 scores at week 2. Response was defined as at least 40% reduction of PANSS-30 and remission as a score of PANSS-8 ≤ 3 on each item at endpoint. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to determine which rating scale had better discriminative capacity. RESULTS: PANSS-8 and PANSS-6 showed acceptable internal consistency, were highly correlated with PANSS-30, and had sensitivity to change. PANSS-8 and PANSS-6 were scalable at each assessment, except for PANSS-6 at baseline. Early improvement using PANSS-8 or PANSS-6 had comparable predictive values with that of PANSS-30 for response/remission. CONCLUSION: PANSS-8 and PANSS-6 are clinically useful measures. Early improvement, regardless of whether PANSS-30, PANSS-8, or PANSS-6 is used, is a statistically significant predictor of response/remission.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: PANSS-8 and PANSS-6 are derived from the 30-item Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS-30). We investigate whether PANSS-8 or PANSS-6 is a reliable, valid, sensitive to change measure, and scalable, and whether early improvement using them can predict response/remission. METHOD: Data were from 3 trials for 270 schizophrenia inpatients receiving antipsychotics. Internal consistency, validity, sensitivity to change, and scalability using PANSS-30, PANSS-8, and PANSS-6 at each assessment were examined. Early improvement was defined as at least 20% reduction of PANSS-30, PANSS-8, or PANSS-6 scores at week 2. Response was defined as at least 40% reduction of PANSS-30 and remission as a score of PANSS-8 ≤ 3 on each item at endpoint. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to determine which rating scale had better discriminative capacity. RESULTS: PANSS-8 and PANSS-6 showed acceptable internal consistency, were highly correlated with PANSS-30, and had sensitivity to change. PANSS-8 and PANSS-6 were scalable at each assessment, except for PANSS-6 at baseline. Early improvement using PANSS-8 or PANSS-6 had comparable predictive values with that of PANSS-30 for response/remission. CONCLUSION: PANSS-8 and PANSS-6 are clinically useful measures. Early improvement, regardless of whether PANSS-30, PANSS-8, or PANSS-6 is used, is a statistically significant predictor of response/remission.
Authors: Stefan Leucht; Johannes Hamann; Spyridon Siafis; Nicola Bursch; Katharina Müller; Lisa Schmid; Florian Schuster; Jakob Waibel; Tri Huynh; Florian Matthes; Alessandro Rodolico; Peter Brieger; Markus Bühner; Stephan Heres Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2022-06-17 Impact factor: 4.144
Authors: Marc S Tibber; James B Kirkbride; Eileen M Joyce; Stanley Mutsatsa; Isobel Harrison; Thomas R E Barnes; Vyv Huddy Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2018-10-30 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Jan Wolff; Gudrun Hefner; Claus Normann; Klaus Kaier; Harald Binder; Katharina Domschke; Christoph Hiemke; Michael Marschollek; Ansgar Klimke Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-04-09 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Kara Dempster; Peter Jeon; Michael MacKinley; Peter Williamson; Jean Théberge; Lena Palaniyappan Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 2020-03-24 Impact factor: 15.992
Authors: Yunzhi Pan; Kara Dempster; Peter Jeon; Jean Théberge; Ali R Khan; Lena Palaniyappan Journal: J Psychiatry Neurosci Date: 2021-04-27 Impact factor: 6.186