Literature DB >> 29280479

Assisted reproductive technology (ART) cumulative live birth rates following preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy (PGD-A) or morphological assessment of embryos: A cohort analysis.

Evelyn Lee1, Georgina Mary Chambers1, Lyndon Hale2, Peter Illingworth3, Leeanda Wilton2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy (PGD-A) for all 24 chromosomes improves implantation and clinical pregnancy rates per single assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycle. However, there is limited data on the live-birth rate of PGD-A over repeated cycles. AIM: To assess the cumulative live-birth rates (CLBR) of PGD-A compared with morphological assessment of embryos of up to three 'complete ART cycles' (fresh plus frozen/thaw cycles) in women aged 37 years or older.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of ART treatments undertaken by ART-naïve women at a large Australian fertility clinic between 2011 and 2014. Cohorts were assigned based on the embryo selection method used in their first fresh cycle [PGD-A, n = 110 women (PGD-A group); morphological assessment of embryos, n = 1983 women (control group)]. CLBR, time to clinical pregnancy and cycles needed to achieve a live birth were measured over multiple cycles.
RESULTS: Compared to the control group, the PGD-A group achieved a higher per cycle live-birth rate (14.47% vs 9.12%, P < 0.01), took a shorter mean time to reach a clinical pregnancy leading to a live-birth (104.8 days vs 140.6 days, P < 0.05) and required fewer cycles to achieve a live-birth (6.91 cycles vs 10.96 cycles, P < 0.01). However, after three 'complete ART cycles', the CLBR was comparable for the two groups (30.90% vs 26.77%, P = 0.34).
CONCLUSION: This is the first study to assess the effectiveness of PGD-A over multiple ART cycles. These real-world findings suggest that PGD-A leads to better outcomes than using morphological assessment alone in women of advanced maternal age.
© 2017 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aneuploidy; assisted reproductive technologies; cumulative live-birth rates; embryo selection based on morphological assessment; preimplantation genetic diagnosis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29280479     DOI: 10.1111/ajo.12756

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0004-8666            Impact factor:   2.100


  5 in total

1.  A tale of two studies: now is no longer the best of times for preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A).

Authors:  Paul N Scriven
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  What Are the Live Birth and Multiple Pregnancy Rates When 1 Versus 2 Low-Quality Blastocysts Are Transferred in a Cryopreserved Cycle? a Retrospective Cohort Study, Stratified for Age, Embryo Quality, and Oocyte Donor Cycles.

Authors:  Suha Arab; Ahmad Badegiesh; Sarah Aldhaheri; Weon-Young Son; Michael H Dahan
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 3.060

3.  Uterine size and volume are associated with higher live birth rate in patients undergoing assisted reproduction technology: A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Hong Gao; Dong-E Liu; Yumei Li; Jing Tang; Xinrui Wu; Hongzhuan Tan
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.817

4.  Assisted reproductive technology in Japan: A summary report for 2019 by the Ethics Committee of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Authors:  Yukiko Katagiri; Seung Chik Jwa; Akira Kuwahara; Takeshi Iwasa; Masanori Ono; Keiichi Kato; Hiroshi Kishi; Yoshimitsu Kuwabara; Miyuki Harada; Toshio Hamatani; Yutaka Osuga
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2021-12-14

5.  Which assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment strategy is the most clinically and cost-effective for women of advanced maternal age: a Markov model.

Authors:  Evelyn Lee; Jinhui Zhang
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 2.908

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.