| Literature DB >> 29280214 |
Annelot Baert1,2, Eva Machackova3, Ilse Coene2, Carol Cremin4, Kristin Turner4, Cheryl Portigal-Todd4, Marie Jill Asrat4, Jennifer Nuk4, Allison Mindlin4, Sean Young4,5, Andree MacMillan6, Tom Van Maerken2, Martin Trbusek7, Wendy McKinnon8, Marie E Wood8, William D Foulkes9, Marta Santamariña10, Miguel de la Hoya11, Lenka Foretova3, Bruce Poppe2, Anne Vral1, Toon Rosseel2, Kim De Leeneer2, Ana Vega10, Kathleen B M Claes2.
Abstract
For 21 putative BRCA1 and BRCA2 splice site variants, the concordance between mRNA analysis and predictions by in silico programs was evaluated. Aberrant splicing was confirmed for 12 alterations. In silico prediction tools were helpful to determine for which variants cDNA analysis is warranted, however, predictions for variants in the Cartegni consensus region but outside the canonical sites, were less reliable. Learning algorithms like Adaboost and Random Forest outperformed the classical tools. Further validations are warranted prior to implementation of these novel tools in clinical settings. Additionally, we report here for the first time activated cryptic donor sites in the large exon 11 of BRCA2 by evaluating the effect at the cDNA level of a novel tandem duplication (5' breakpoint in intron 4; 3' breakpoint in exon 11) and of a variant disrupting the splice donor site of exon 11 (c.6841+1G > C). Additional sites were predicted, but not activated. These sites warrant further research to increase our knowledge on cis and trans acting factors involved in the conservation of correct transcription of this large exon. This may contribute to adequate design of ASOs (antisense oligonucleotides), an emerging therapy to render cancer cells sensitive to PARP inhibitor and platinum therapies.Entities:
Keywords: BRCA1/2; alternative splicing; cDNA analysis; in silico prediction tools; learning algorithms
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29280214 DOI: 10.1002/humu.23390
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hum Mutat ISSN: 1059-7794 Impact factor: 4.878