Literature DB >> 29280092

Classifying clinical notes with pain assessment using machine learning.

Samah Jamal Fodeh1, Dezon Finch2, Lina Bouayad2, Stephen L Luther2, Han Ling3, Robert D Kerns4,5,6,7, Cynthia Brandt7,8.   

Abstract

Pain is a significant public health problem, affecting millions of people in the USA. Evidence has highlighted that patients with chronic pain often suffer from deficits in pain care quality (PCQ) including pain assessment, treatment, and reassessment. Currently, there is no intelligent and reliable approach to identify PCQ indicators inelectronic health records (EHR). Hereby, we used unstructured text narratives in the EHR to derive pain assessment in clinical notes for patients with chronic pain. Our dataset includes patients with documented pain intensity rating ratings > = 4 and initial musculoskeletal diagnoses (MSD) captured by (ICD-9-CM codes) in fiscal year 2011 and a minimal 1 year of follow-up (follow-up period is 3-yr maximum); with complete data on key demographic variables. A total of 92 patients with 1058 notes was used. First, we manually annotated qualifiers and descriptors of pain assessment using the annotation schema that we previously developed. Second, we developed a reliable classifier for indicators of pain assessment in clinical note. Based on our annotation schema, we found variations in documenting the subclasses of pain assessment. In positive notes, providers mostly documented assessment of pain site (67%) and intensity of pain (57%), followed by persistence (32%). In only 27% of positive notes, did providers document a presumed etiology for the pain complaint or diagnosis. Documentation of patients' reports of factors that aggravate pain was only present in 11% of positive notes. Random forest classifier achieved the best performance labeling clinical notes with pain assessment information, compared to other classifiers; 94, 95, 94, and 94% was observed in terms of accuracy, PPV, F1-score, and AUC, respectively. Despite the wide spectrum of research that utilizes machine learning in many clinical applications, none explored using these methods for pain assessment research. In addition, previous studies using large datasets to detect and analyze characteristics of patients with various types of pain have relied exclusively on billing and coded data as the main source of information. This study, in contrast, harnessed unstructured narrative text data from the EHR to detect pain assessment clinical notes. We developed a Random forest classifier to identify clinical notes with pain assessment information. Compared to other classifiers, ours achieved the best results in most of the reported metrics. Graphical abstract Framework for detecting pain assessment in clinical notes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assessment; Classification; Pain; Random forest

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29280092      PMCID: PMC6014866          DOI: 10.1007/s11517-017-1772-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  29 in total

1.  Random forest: a classification and regression tool for compound classification and QSAR modeling.

Authors:  Vladimir Svetnik; Andy Liaw; Christopher Tong; J Christopher Culberson; Robert P Sheridan; Bradley P Feuston
Journal:  J Chem Inf Comput Sci       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec

2.  MEDICAL RECORDS, PATIENT CARE, AND MEDICAL EDUCATION.

Authors:  L L WEED
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1964-06       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  Baseline cluster membership demonstrates positive associations with first occurrence of multiple gerontologic outcomes over 10 years.

Authors:  Samah J Fodeh; Mark Trentalange; Heather G Allore; Thomas M Gill; Cynthia A Brandt; Terrence E Murphy
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.645

4.  Approximate Statistical Tests for Comparing Supervised Classification Learning Algorithms.

Authors: 
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  1998-09-15       Impact factor: 2.026

5.  Development and application of an electronic health record information extraction tool to assess quality of pain management in primary care.

Authors:  Lindsey M Dorflinger; Wesley P Gilliam; Allison W Lee; Robert D Kerns
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 6.  Identifying neck and back pain in administrative data: defining the right cohort.

Authors:  Patricia L Sinnott; Andrew M Siroka; Andrea C Shane; Jodie A Trafton; Todd H Wagner
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Using electronic health records data to identify patients with chronic pain in a primary care setting.

Authors:  Terrence Y Tian; Ianita Zlateva; Daren R Anderson
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Accuracy of the pain numeric rating scale as a screening test in primary care.

Authors:  Erin E Krebs; Timothy S Carey; Morris Weinberger
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Clinical characteristics and patterns of healthcare utilization in patients with painful neuropathic disorders in UK general practice: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ariel Berger; Alesia Sadosky; Ellen Dukes; John Edelsberg; Gerry Oster
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 2.474

10.  The musculoskeletal diagnosis cohort: examining pain and pain care among veterans.

Authors:  Joseph L Goulet; Robert D Kerns; Matthew Bair; William C Becker; Penny Brennan; Diana J Burgess; Constance M Carroll; Steven Dobscha; Mary A Driscoll; Brenda T Fenton; Liana Fraenkel; Sally G Haskell; Alicia A Heapy; Diana M Higgins; Rani A Hoff; Ula Hwang; Amy C Justice; John D Piette; Patsi Sinnott; Laura Wandner; Julie A Womack; Cynthia A Brandt
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 7.926

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Framework for improving outcome prediction for acute to chronic low back pain transitions.

Authors:  Steven Z George; Trevor A Lentz; Jason M Beneciuk; Nrupen A Bhavsar; Jennifer M Mundt; Jeff Boissoneault
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2020-03-04

Review 2.  Sensor Technologies to Manage the Physiological Traits of Chronic Pain: A Review.

Authors:  David Naranjo-Hernández; Javier Reina-Tosina; Laura M Roa
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 3.  Application Scenarios for Artificial Intelligence in Nursing Care: Rapid Review.

Authors:  Kathrin Seibert; Dominik Domhoff; Dominik Bruch; Matthias Schulte-Althoff; Daniel Fürstenau; Felix Biessmann; Karin Wolf-Ostermann
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 5.428

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.