Xin Gao 1 , Lijun Zhang 2 , Rajeshwari Sridhara 2 . Show Affiliations »
Abstract
Purpose: Both objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival as defined by RECIST are weakly associated with overall survival (OS) in trials evaluating immunotherapy drug products. We proposed a novel intermediate response endpoint (IME) for evaluating immunotherapies.Experimental Design: We defined IME response as having no nontarget lesion progression, no new lesion appearance, and reaching a target lesion response determined by baseline tumor burden, tumor reduction depth, and tumor change dynamics within one year after randomization. Database used consisted of data from randomized active-controlled immunotherapy trials. Criterion for IME was developed on the basis of patient-level data from a training dataset, and further evaluated using an independent testing dataset. A patient-level responder analysis comparing OS between patients with and without an IME response was conducted using combined data. Association between trial-level OS hazard ratio (HR) and IME odds ratio (OR) was analyzed using a weighted linear regression model. Results: A total of 5,806 patients from 9 randomized studies were included in the database. At patient level, patients with IME response had improved OS compared with nonresponders (HR = 0.09). At trial level, association between OS and IME was moderate (R2 = 0.68).Conclusions: The IME was moderately associated with OS, and the association appeared to be stronger than the association observed between RECIST-defined ORR and OS. However, the analyses conducted in this research are exploratory and further evaluation is needed before using this endpoint in future studies. Clin Cancer Res; 24(10); 2262-7. ©2017 AACR. ©2017 American Association for Cancer Research.
Purpose: Both objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival as defined by RECIST are weakly associated with overall survival (OS ) in trials evaluating immunotherapy drug products. We proposed a novel intermediate response endpoint (IME ) for evaluating immunotherapies.Experimental Design: We defined IME response as having no nontarget lesion progression, no new lesion appearance, and reaching a target lesion response determined by baseline tumor burden, tumor reduction depth , and tumor change dynamics within one year after randomization. Database used consisted of data from randomized active-controlled immunotherapy trials. Criterion for IME was developed on the basis of patient -level data from a training dataset, and further evaluated using an independent testing dataset. A patient -level responder analysis comparing OS between patients with and without an IME response was conducted using combined data. Association between trial-level OS hazard ratio (HR) and IME odds ratio (OR) was analyzed using a weighted linear regression model. Results: A total of 5,806 patients from 9 randomized studies were included in the database. At patient level, patients with IME response had improved OS compared with nonresponders (HR = 0.09). At trial level, association between OS and IME was moderate (R2 = 0.68).Conclusions: The IME was moderately associated with OS , and the association appeared to be stronger than the association observed between RECIST-defined ORR and OS . However, the analyses conducted in this research are exploratory and further evaluation is needed before using this endpoint in future studies. Clin Cancer Res; 24(10); 2262-7. ©2017 AACR. ©2017 American Association for Cancer Research.
Entities: Chemical
Disease
Species
Mesh: See more »
Substances: See more »
Year: 2017
PMID: 29279318 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-2111
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Cancer Res ISSN: 1078-0432 Impact factor: 12.531