Literature DB >> 29278643

Response biomarkers in neonatal intervention studies.

Lauren E Kelly1, Kimberly Caswell2, Mary A Short3, Prabhu S Parimi4, Martin Offringa1, Thomas Diacovo5.   

Abstract

BackgroundUp to 90% of all drugs used in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) have not been clinically tested for safety and efficacy. To promote drug development for neonates, the pharmaceutical industry is moving toward rigorous testing, necessitating the need to development, and validating biomarkers in neonates to predict their response. The objective of this review is to evaluate the quality of the response biomarker reporting in neonatal clinical trials.MethodsA validated literature search strategy was applied. Prospective neonatal intervention studies reporting response biomarkers published in 2014 were included. The data were extracted independently and in duplicate using a data-extraction form.ResultsFollowing the full-text review, 167 published prospective neonatal trials were included; 35% (59/167) reported the use of response biomarkers. In these 59 trials, we identified 275 biomarkers used to measure the response (pharmacodynamics and safety) reported as primary or secondary outcomes. Heart rate and oxygen saturation were the most commonly reported. Measurement and instrumentation data were often not provided.ConclusionWe identified a huge variability in the selection, measurement, and reporting of neonatal response biomarkers in prospective intervention studies. Reporting initiatives are needed to reduce research waste and improve the reproducibility of biomarker use in neonatal intervention studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29278643     DOI: 10.1038/pr.2017.204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Res        ISSN: 0031-3998            Impact factor:   3.756


  20 in total

Review 1.  Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual framework.

Authors: 
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 6.875

2.  Integration and use of biomarkers in drug development, regulation and clinical practice: a US regulatory perspective.

Authors:  Shashi Amur; Felix W Frueh; Lawrence J Lesko; Shiew-Mei Huang
Journal:  Biomark Med       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.851

3.  Early versus late enteral prophylactic iron supplementation in preterm very low birth weight infants: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Rojo Joy; Sriram Krishnamurthy; Adhisivam Bethou; Medha Rajappa; P H Ananthanarayanan; B Vishnu Bhat
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 5.747

Review 4.  Safety, dosing, and pharmaceutical quality for studies that evaluate medicinal products (including biological products) in neonates.

Authors:  Robert M Ward; Daniel Benjamin; Jeffrey S Barrett; Karel Allegaert; Ronald Portman; Jonathan M Davis; Mark A Turner
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 3.756

5.  Closing the gaps in pediatric laboratory reference intervals: a CALIPER database of 40 biochemical markers in a healthy and multiethnic population of children.

Authors:  David A Colantonio; Lianna Kyriakopoulou; Man Khun Chan; Caitlin H Daly; Davor Brinc; Allison A Venner; Maria D Pasic; David Armbruster; Khosrow Adeli
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 6.  Cancer biomarker discovery: Opportunities and pitfalls in analytical methods.

Authors:  Haleem J Issaq; Timothy J Waybright; Timothy D Veenstra
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 3.535

7.  Growth and fatty acid profiles of VLBW infants receiving a multicomponent lipid emulsion from birth.

Authors:  Hester Vlaardingerbroek; Marijn J Vermeulen; Virgilio P Carnielli; Frédéric M Vaz; Chris H P van den Akker; Johannes B van Goudoever
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.839

8.  STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies.

Authors:  Patrick M Bossuyt; Johannes B Reitsma; David E Bruns; Constantine A Gatsonis; Paul P Glasziou; Les Irwig; Jeroen G Lijmer; David Moher; Drummond Rennie; Henrica C W de Vet; Herbert Y Kressel; Nader Rifai; Robert M Golub; Douglas G Altman; Lotty Hooft; Daniël A Korevaar; Jérémie F Cohen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Biomedical research: increasing value, reducing waste.

Authors:  Malcolm R Macleod; Susan Michie; Ian Roberts; Ulrich Dirnagl; Iain Chalmers; John P A Ioannidis; Rustam Al-Shahi Salman; An-Wen Chan; Paul Glasziou
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research.

Authors:  Paul Glasziou; Douglas G Altman; Patrick Bossuyt; Isabelle Boutron; Mike Clarke; Steven Julious; Susan Michie; David Moher; Elizabeth Wager
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  2 in total

1.  Biomarkers for neonatal therapeutic studies: time for a public-private partnership.

Authors:  Scott C Denne; Jonathan M Davis
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 3.756

Review 2.  Useful pharmacodynamic endpoints in children: selection, measurement, and next steps.

Authors:  Lauren E Kelly; Yashwant Sinha; Charlotte I S Barker; Joseph F Standing; Martin Offringa
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 3.756

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.