Jerome Engel1. 1. Departments of Neurology, Neurobiology and Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences and the Brain Research Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Three randomized controlled trials demonstrate that surgical treatment is safe and effective for drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE), yet fewer than 1% of patients are referred for surgery. This is a review of recent trends in surgical referral for DRE, and advances in the field. Reasons for continued underutilization are discussed. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent series indicate no increase in surgical referral for DRE over the past two decades. One study suggests that decreased referrals to major epilepsy centers can be accounted for by increased referrals to low-volume nonacademic hospitals where results are poorer, and complication rates higher. The increasing ability of high-resolution MRI to identify small neocortical lesions and an increase in pediatric surgeries, in part, explain a relative greater decrease in temporal lobe surgeries. Misconceptions continue to restrict referral. Consequently, advocacy for referral of all patients with DRE to epilepsy centers that offer specialized diagnosis and other alternative treatments, as well as psychosocial support, is recommended. Recent advances will continue to improve the safety and efficacy of surgical treatment and expand the types of patients who benefit from surgical intervention. SUMMARY: Surgical treatment for epilepsy remains underutilized, in part because of persistent misconceptions. Rather than promote referral for surgery, it would be more appropriate to advocate that all patients with DRE deserve a consultation at a full-service epilepsy center that offers many options for eliminating or reducing disability.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Three randomized controlled trials demonstrate that surgical treatment is safe and effective for drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE), yet fewer than 1% of patients are referred for surgery. This is a review of recent trends in surgical referral for DRE, and advances in the field. Reasons for continued underutilization are discussed. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent series indicate no increase in surgical referral for DRE over the past two decades. One study suggests that decreased referrals to major epilepsy centers can be accounted for by increased referrals to low-volume nonacademic hospitals where results are poorer, and complication rates higher. The increasing ability of high-resolution MRI to identify small neocortical lesions and an increase in pediatric surgeries, in part, explain a relative greater decrease in temporal lobe surgeries. Misconceptions continue to restrict referral. Consequently, advocacy for referral of all patients with DRE to epilepsy centers that offer specialized diagnosis and other alternative treatments, as well as psychosocial support, is recommended. Recent advances will continue to improve the safety and efficacy of surgical treatment and expand the types of patients who benefit from surgical intervention. SUMMARY: Surgical treatment for epilepsy remains underutilized, in part because of persistent misconceptions. Rather than promote referral for surgery, it would be more appropriate to advocate that all patients with DRE deserve a consultation at a full-service epilepsy center that offers many options for eliminating or reducing disability.
Authors: Walter J Jermakowicz; Andres M Kanner; Samir Sur; Christina Bermudez; Pierre-Francois D'Haese; John Paul G Kolcun; Iahn Cajigas; Rui Li; Carlos Millan; Ramses Ribot; Enrique A Serrano; Naymee Velez; Merredith R Lowe; Gustavo J Rey; Jonathan R Jagid Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2017-02-28 Impact factor: 5.864
Authors: Jerome Engel; Michael P McDermott; Samuel Wiebe; John T Langfitt; John M Stern; Sandra Dewar; Michael R Sperling; Irenita Gardiner; Giuseppe Erba; Itzhak Fried; Margaret Jacobs; Harry V Vinters; Scott Mintzer; Karl Kieburtz Journal: JAMA Date: 2012-03-07 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Eric B Geller; Tara L Skarpaas; Robert E Gross; Robert R Goodman; Gregory L Barkley; Carl W Bazil; Michael J Berg; Gregory K Bergey; Sydney S Cash; Andrew J Cole; Robert B Duckrow; Jonathan C Edwards; Stephan Eisenschenk; James Fessler; Nathan B Fountain; Alicia M Goldman; Ryder P Gwinn; Christianne Heck; Aamar Herekar; Lawrence J Hirsch; Barbara C Jobst; David King-Stephens; Douglas R Labar; James W Leiphart; W Richard Marsh; Kimford J Meador; Eli M Mizrahi; Anthony M Murro; Dileep R Nair; Katherine H Noe; Yong D Park; Paul A Rutecki; Vicenta Salanova; Raj D Sheth; Donald C Shields; Christopher Skidmore; Michael C Smith; David C Spencer; Shraddha Srinivasan; William Tatum; Paul C Van Ness; David G Vossler; Robert E Wharen; Gregory A Worrell; Daniel Yoshor; Richard S Zimmerman; Kathy Cicora; Felice T Sun; Martha J Morrell Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2017-04-11 Impact factor: 5.864
Authors: Thomas Sauvigny; Katja Brückner; Lasse Dührsen; Oliver Heese; Manfred Westphal; Stefan R G Stodieck; Tobias Martens Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2016-09-28 Impact factor: 5.864
Authors: Ingmar Blümcke; Maria Thom; Eleonora Aronica; Dawna D Armstrong; Fabrice Bartolomei; Andrea Bernasconi; Neda Bernasconi; Christian G Bien; Fernando Cendes; Roland Coras; J Helen Cross; Thomas S Jacques; Philippe Kahane; Gary W Mathern; Haijme Miyata; Solomon L Moshé; Buge Oz; Çiğdem Özkara; Emilio Perucca; Sanjay Sisodiya; Samuel Wiebe; Roberto Spreafico Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2013-05-20 Impact factor: 5.864
Authors: Chen-Ling Gan; Yulian Zou; Dongmei Chen; Xindong Shui; Li Hu; Ruomeng Li; Tao Zhang; Junhao Wang; Yingxue Mei; Long Wang; Mi Zhang; Yuan Tian; Xi Gu; Tae Ho Lee Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2022-06-07 Impact factor: 6.208
Authors: Joshua J Bear; Jenifer L Sargent; Brent R O'Neill; Kevin E Chapman; Debashis Ghosh; Heidi E Kirsch; Jason R Tregellas Journal: J Clin Neurophysiol Date: 2021-11-23 Impact factor: 2.590
Authors: Jonathan P Scoville; Evan Joyce; Joshua Hunsaker; Jared Reese; Herschel Wilde; Amir Arain; Robert L Bollo; John D Rolston Journal: Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) Date: 2021-06-15 Impact factor: 2.703
Authors: Chloe E Hill; Chun Chieh Lin; Samuel W Terman; Subhendu Rath; Jack M Parent; Lesli E Skolarus; James F Burke Journal: Neurology Date: 2021-07-15 Impact factor: 11.800