| Literature DB >> 29278390 |
Shixiong Sheng1, Bo Liu2, Xiangyu Hou3, Bing Wu4, Fang Yao5, Xinchun Ding6, Lin Huang7.
Abstract
This study investigated the biodegradation performance and characteristics of Sudan I and Acid Orange 7 (AO7) to improve the biological dye removal efficiency in wastewater and optimize the treatment process. The dyes with different water-solubility and similar molecular structure were biologically treated under aerobic condition in parallel continuous-flow mixed stirred reactors. The biophase analysis using microscopic examination suggested that the removal process of the two azo dyes is different. Removal of Sudan I was through biosorption, since it easily assembled and adsorbed on the surface of zoogloea due to its insolubility, while AO7 was biodegraded incompletely and bioconverted, the AO7 molecule was decomposed to benzene series and inorganic ions, since it could reach the interior area of zoogloea due to the low oxidation-reduction potential conditions and corresponding anaerobic microorganisms. The transformation of NH₃-N, SO₄2- together with the presence of tryptophan-like components confirm that AO7 can be decomposed to non-toxic products in an aerobic bioreactor. This study provides a theoretical basis for the use of biosorption or biodegradation mechanisms for the treatment of different azo dyes in wastewater.Entities:
Keywords: Acid Orange 7; Sudan I; aerobic biodegradation; azo dye; solubility
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29278390 PMCID: PMC5800135 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15010035
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Major composition of inffluent from reactors.
| Trial | Reactor | Starch | Sodium Sulfate | Glucose | Sudan I | Acid Orange 7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Reactor A (RA) | 500 ± 55 | 1250 ± 11 | 230 ± 50 | -- | -- |
| 2 | Reactor B (RB) | 500 ± 50 | 1250 ± 13 | -- | 0.75 ± 0.6 | -- |
| 3 | Reactor C (RC) | 500 ± 53 | 1250 ± 10 | -- | -- | 0.75 ± 0.2 |
Figure 1(a) COD (chemical oxygen demand) concentration and removal in the Reactor A (RA), Reactor B (RB) and Reactor C (RC); (b) RRF (relative removal factor) analysis of RB and RC.
Figure 2Image ofactivated sludge phase detected by optical microscope (100 folds) from (a) RB and (b) RC reactors.
Figure 3Absorbance of effluent from RC reactor by fall wave scanning at different stages.
Figure 4EEM (excitation-emission-matrix) fluorescence spectra of (a) RC reactor effluent at two weeks, and (b) in a month.
Figure 5Change of dissolved oxygen and oxidation reduction potential in three reactors.