Literature DB >> 29277799

Long-term Outcomes of a Dose-reduction Trial to Decrease Late Gastrointestinal Toxicity in Patients with Prostate Cancer Receiving Soft Tissue-matched Image-guided Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy.

Naomi Sasaki1, Hideya Yamazaki2, Daisuke Shimizu1, Gen Suzuki1, Koji Masui1, Satoaki Nakamura1, Haruumi Okabe3, Tatsuyuki Nishikawa3, Ken Yoshida4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: We experienced an unexpected high incidence of gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity in patients undergoing image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IG-IMRT) using helical tomotherapy in our initial 2.2 Gy/fraction schedule for prostate cancer; hence, a dose-reduction trial from 2.2 Gy to 2 Gy/fraction was conducted using modified planning target volume (PTV) contouring. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We compared 130 patients treated using 2.2 Gy/fraction (Group A) and 144 treated using the 2 Gy/fraction (Group B) with modified PTV (excluding rectal volume) with a median follow-up period of 62 months. Prescribed dose was 72.6-74.8 Gy in 33-34 fractions (Group A) and 72-74 Gy in 36-37 fractions (Group B).
RESULTS: Patients in Group B had a reduced rectal and bladder V10-V70 and were irradiated at the maximal dose. Their cumulative incidence of grade ≤2 GI toxicity at 5 years improved from 10.1% [95% confidence interval (CI), 4.9-15.3%] to 1.4% (0-3.3%). Grade 2≤ urinary toxicity also decreased from 5.5% (1.5-9.4%) in Group A to 1.4% (0-3.3%, p=0.0167) in Group B. The biochemical failure-free 5-year survival rate was 89.1% (95%CI=83.6-95.4%) and 87.5% (82.0-92.9%, p=0.75) in groups A and B, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The reduced dose fraction schedule decreased the incidence of late GI toxicity without compromising prostate-specific antigen control. Careful target volume definition and fraction size are important even for IG-IMRT. Copyright
© 2018, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IMRT; Prostate cancer IGRT; gastrointestinal toxicity; helical tomotherapy; rectal bleeding

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29277799     DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.12234

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anticancer Res        ISSN: 0250-7005            Impact factor:   2.480


  7 in total

1.  Toxicity reduction required for MRI-guided radiotherapy to be cost-effective in the treatment of localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Leif-Erik D Schumacher; Alan Dal Pra; Sarah E Hoffe; Eric A Mellon
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Effect of Androgen Deprivation Therapy on Other-Cause of Mortality in Elderly Patients with Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer Treated with Modern Radiotherapy: Is There a Negative Impact?

Authors:  Hideya Yamazaki; Koji Masui; Gen Suzuki; Satoaki Nakamura; Norihiro Aibe; Daisuke Shimizu; Kei Yamada; Koji Okihara; Takumi Shiraishi; Tadayuki Kotsuma; Ken Yoshida; Eiichi Tanaka; Keisuke Otani; Yasuo Yoshioka; Kazuhiko Ogawa; Tatsuyuki Nishikawa; Haruumi Okabe
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 4.241

3.  Ultrahypofractionated Radiotherapy versus Conventional to Moderate Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Hideya Yamazaki; Gen Suzuki; Norihiro Aibe; Daisuke Shimizu; Takuya Kimoto; Koji Masui; Ken Yoshida; Satoaki Nakamura; Yasutoshi Hashimoto; Haruumi Okabe
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 6.639

4.  Conventional dose versus dose escalated radiotherapy including high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost for patients with Gleason score 9-10 clinical localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hideya Yamazaki; Gen Suzuki; Norihiro Aibe; Daisuke Shimizu; Takuya Kimoto; Koji Masui; Ken Yoshida; Satoaki Nakamura; Haruumi Okabe
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Role of Brachytherapy Boost in Clinically Localized Intermediate and High-Risk Prostate Cancer: Lack of Benefit in Patients with Very High-Risk Factors T3b-4 and/or Gleason 9-10.

Authors:  Hideya Yamazaki; Gen Suzuki; Koji Masui; Norihiro Aibe; Daisuke Shimizu; Takuya Kimoto; Kei Yamada; Koji Okihara; Takashi Ueda; Tsukasa Narukawa; Takumi Shiraishi; Atsuko Fujihara; Ken Yoshida; Satoaki Nakamura; Takashi Kato; Yasutoshi Hashimoto; Haruumi Okabe
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 6.575

6.  Comparison of Image-Guided Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and Low-dose Rate Brachytherapy with or without External Beam Radiotherapy in Patients with Localized Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Takuji Tsubokura; Hideya Yamazaki; Koji Masui; Naomi Sasaki; Daisuke Shimizu; Gen Suzuki; Satoaki Nakamura; Kei Yamada; Koji Okihara; Takumi Shiraishi; Ken Yoshida; Tatsuyuki Nishikawa; Haruumi Okabe
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy Monotherapy versus Image-Guided Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy with Helical Tomotherapy for Patients with Localized Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Hideya Yamazaki; Koji Masui; Gen Suzuki; Satoaki Nakamura; Daisuke Shimizu; Tatsuyuki Nishikawa; Haruumi Okabe; Ken Yoshida; Tadayuki Kotsuma; Eiichi Tanaka; Keisuke Otani; Yasuo Yoshioka; Kazuhiko Ogawa
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 6.639

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.