Literature DB >> 29277793

Retzius-sparing Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Associated with Less Bladder Neck Descent and Better Early Continence Outcome.

Li-Wen Chang1, Sheng-Chun Hung1,2, Ju-Chuan Hu1, Kun-Yuan Chiu3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: We attempted to evaluate the association of early continence outcome of Retzius-sparing robotic assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and bladder neck descent with postoperative cystography. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From November 2014 to December 2015, 30 patients with prostate cancer who received Retzius-sparing LRP/ RARP were compared to 30 patients that received retropubic approach RARP with propensity score matching analysis. Cystogram was used to evaluate the bladder neck descent using the bladder neck to pubic symphysis (BNPS) ratio and the continence state was evaluated.
RESULTS: A total 60 patients were included 30 of which had received Retzius-sparing and 30 the retropubic approach, using propensity score matching analysis. There was no difference in age, prostate size, pathology T stage and PSA among groups. BNPS ratio is significantly low in the Retzius-sparing group (0.25±0.10 vs. 0.46±0.14, p=0.000). Early continence was improved in the Retzius-sparing group and early continence within the first week was 73.3% compared to 26.7% (p=0.000), but no difference was seen at one year (100.0% vs. 93.30%, p=0.150). The independent risk factors affecting post-operative continence were age and approach. The association between less bladder neck descent as BNP ratio and continence was also confirmed (HR=0.048, 95%CI=0.005-0.420, p=0.006).
CONCLUSION: With the advantage of more normal pelvic anatomy preserved in Retzius-sparing RARP, it was associated with less bladder neck descent and better early continence outcome. Age was also an independent risk factor for postoperative continence. Copyright
© 2018, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cystogram; Retzius-spairng; continence; radical prostatectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29277793     DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.12228

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anticancer Res        ISSN: 0250-7005            Impact factor:   2.480


  13 in total

1.  Retzius-sparing robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: racial considerations for 250 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Rashid K Sayyid; Dalton Sherwood; William G Simpson; Martha K Terris; Zachary Klaassen; Rabii Madi
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2020-05-29

2.  Early urinary continence recovery following retzius-sparing robotic-assistant radical prostatectomy with suprapubic catheter: a short-term follow-up outcome.

Authors:  Ding Xu; Zhongqing Yang; Jun Qi; Jens Mundhenk; Patrick Zanker; Christian Schwentner; Ye Lei
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-02-27       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  The location of the bladder neck in postoperative cystography predicts continence convalescence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Susumu Kageyama; Tetsuya Yoshida; Masayuki Nagasawa; Shigehisa Kubota; Keiji Tomita; Kenichi Kobayashi; Ryosuke Murai; Teruhiko Tsuru; Eiki Hanada; Kazuyoshi Johnin; Mitsuhiro Narita; Akihiro Kawauchi
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 4.  Techniques of robotic radical prostatectomy for the management of prostate cancer: which one, when and why.

Authors:  Shuo Liu; Ashok Hemal
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-04

5.  Impact of protruded median lobe on perioperative, urinary continence and oncological outcomes of Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jiajun Qian; Yao Fu; Xiao Wu; Liu Xu; Mengjie Zhang; Qing Zhang; Joel Elliot Rosenberg; Linfeng Xu; Xuefeng Qiu; Hongqian Guo
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-02

6.  Bladder neck sparing during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Six-year experience.

Authors:  Sercan Yilmaz; Esat Ak; Eymen Gazel; Serdar Yalcin; Kenan Yigit Yildiz; Lutfi Tunc
Journal:  North Clin Istanb       Date:  2021-05-24

7.  Retzius-sparing versus standard robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Joel E Rosenberg; Jae Hung Jung; Zach Edgerton; Hunju Lee; Solam Lee; Caitlin J Bakker; Philipp Dahm
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-08-18

8.  Comparison of Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy vs standard robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yu-Li Jiang; Gao-Feng Zheng; Ze-Peng Jiang; Xie-Lai Zhou; Jin Zhou; Chun-Hua Ye; Kang-Er Wang
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 2.264

9.  Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: functional and early oncologic results in aggressive and locally advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  Joanne Nyaboe Nyarangi-Dix; Magdalena Görtz; Georgi Gradinarov; Luisa Hofer; Viktoria Schütz; Claudia Gasch; Jan Philipp Radtke; Markus Hohenfellner
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 2.264

10.  Transvesical Versus Posterior Approach to Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Retrospective Comparison With a 12-Month Follow-Up.

Authors:  Wen Deng; Cheng Zhang; Hao Jiang; Yulei Li; Ke Zhu; Xiaoqiang Liu; Luyao Chen; Weipeng Liu; Ju Guo; Xiaochen Zhou; Bin Fu; Gongxian Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.