Literature DB >> 29277407

Skin cancer interventions across the cancer control continuum: Review of technology, environment, and theory.

Jennifer M Taber1, Barbra A Dickerman2, Jean-Phillip Okhovat2, Alan C Geller2, Laura A Dwyer3, Anne M Hartman4, Frank M Perna4.   

Abstract

The National Cancer Institute's Skin Cancer Intervention across the Cancer Control Continuum model was developed to summarize research and identify gaps concerning skin cancer interventions. We conducted a mapping review to characterize whether behavioral interventions addressing skin cancer prevention and control from 2000 to 2015 included (1) technology, (2) environmental manipulations (policy and/or built environment), and (3) a theoretical basis. We included 86 studies with a randomized controlled or quasi-experimental design that targeted behavioral intervention in skin cancer for children and/or adults; seven of these were dissemination or implementation studies. Of the interventions described in the remaining 79 articles, 57 promoted only prevention behaviors (e.g., ultraviolet radiation protection), five promoted only detection (e.g., skin examinations), 10 promoted both prevention and detection, and seven focused on survivorship. Of the 79 non-dissemination studies, two-thirds used some type of technology (n=52; 65.8%). Technology specific to skin cancer was infrequently used: UVR photography was used in 15.2% of studies (n=12), reflectance spectroscopy was used in 12.7% (n=10), and dermatoscopes (n=1) and dosimeters (n=2) were each used in less than 3%. Ten studies (12.7%) targeted the built environment. Fifty-two (65.8%) of the studies included theory-based interventions. The most common theories were Social Cognitive Theory (n=20; 25.3%), Health Belief Model (n=17; 21.5%), and the Theory of Planned Behavior/Reasoned Action (n=12; 15.2%). Results suggest that skin cancer specific technology and environmental manipulations are underutilized in skin cancer behavioral interventions. We discuss implications of these results for researchers developing skin cancer behavioral interventions.
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Behavior; Cancer control; Cancer control continuum; Detection; Environment; Intervention; Prevention; Review; Screening; Skin cancer; Technology; Theory

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29277407      PMCID: PMC5949070          DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.12.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  5 in total

1.  Patterns of sun safety behaviors in parents: Associations with physical activity, sedentary behavior, and access to neighborhood physical activity resources.

Authors:  Jenna D Gilchrist; Kasey L Morris; Laura A Dwyer; David E Conroy
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 2.  Shade as an Environmental Design Tool for Skin Cancer Prevention.

Authors:  Dawn M Holman; George Thomas Kapelos; Meredith Shoemaker; Meg Watson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Application of the Protection Motivation Theory (PMT) in Teaching Skin Cancer Prevention Behaviors in Male Students.

Authors:  Afsaneh Maleki; Seyedeh Shahrbanoo Daniali; Hossein Shahnazi; Akbar Hassanzadeh
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 1.771

Review 4.  Digital interventions for promoting sun protection and skin self-examination behaviors: A systematic review.

Authors:  Zhaomeng Niu; Trishnee Bhurosy; Carolyn J Heckman
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2022-01-29

5.  Why? What? How? Using an Intervention Mapping approach to develop a personalised intervention to improve adherence to photoprotection in patients with Xeroderma Pigmentosum.

Authors:  Jessica Walburn; Kirby Sainsbury; Lesley Foster; John Weinman; Myfanwy Morgan; Sam Norton; Martha Canfield; Paul Chadwick; Bob Sarkany; Vera Araújo-Soares
Journal:  Health Psychol Behav Med       Date:  2020-10-27
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.