| Literature DB >> 29276743 |
Gladys Mosomtai1,2, Magnus Evander3, Charles Mundia2, Per Sandström4, Clas Ahlm5, Osama Ahmed Hassan3, Olivia Wesula Lwande3, Moses K Gachari2, Tobias Landmann1, Rosemary Sang1.
Abstract
Rift Valley fever (RVF) is a zoonotic disease affecting humans and animals. It is caused by RVF virus transmitted primarily by Aedes mosquitoes. The data presented in this article propose environmental layers suitable for mapping RVF vector habitat zones and livestock migratory routes. Using species distribution modelling, we used RVF vector occurrence data sampled along livestock migratory routes to identify suitable vector habitats within the study region which is located in the central and the north-eastern part of Kenya. Eleven herds monitored with GPS collars were used to estimate cattle utilization distribution patterns. We used kernel density estimator to produce utilization contours where the 0.5 percentile represents core grazing areas and the 0.99 percentile represents the entire home range. The home ranges were overlaid on the vector suitability map to identify risks zones for possible RVF exposure. Assimilating high spatial and temporal livestock movement and vector distribution datasets generates new knowledge in understanding RVF epidemiology and generates spatially explicit risk maps. The results can be used to guide vector control and vaccination strategies for better disease control.Entities:
Keywords: Home range estimation; Rift Valley fever; Vector distribution
Year: 2017 PMID: 29276743 PMCID: PMC5738198 DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2017.11.097
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Data Brief ISSN: 2352-3409
Fig. 1Integrated vector habitat suitability and cattle home range map. Reddish shades represents suitable vector habitat conditions while green represents non-suitable habitats for RVF vectors. Cattle grazing areas are shown as curved lines whereby 0.5 represents the core grazing areas and the 0.99 represents the entire home range.
Fig. 2Map showing a) sampled RVF vectors along cattle migratory routes, b) migratory routes of collared herds.
Fig. 3Maps of vegetation seasonality parameters extracted from TIMESAT; a) Base NDVI value, b) amplitude, c) Maximum NDVI value in the season, d) Small integral value, e) Length of season (months), f) Large integral value, g) end of season and h) middle of season.
Fig. 4Maps showing the first (a) and second (b) principal components for evapotranspiration data. The legend represents the amount of variance in the data (eigenvalues) with green shade representing low variance while red shade represents high variance in each component.
Fig. 5Maps showing topographic wetness index (TWI) (a) and soil types (b) of the study area. Deep brown colour in TWI represents high water saturation areas such as plains and dambos whereas light brown shades represent higher ridges and hills with no water saturation.
Fig. 6Map showing climatic characteristics of the study area; a) Temperature seasonality (°C), b) Number of dry months (months), c) Minimum temperature coolest month (°C), d) Rainfall wettest month (mm), e) Rainfall driest month (mm) and f) Rainfall driest quarter (mm).
Summary of data sources.
| Description | Data | Data formats | Source | Period | Resolution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cattle movement | GPS collars | Vector (raw) | 11 Herds | Sep 2012 to Jul 2016 | 1 hour fixes |
| Mosquito sampling | Lat, long | Vector (raw) | GPS | Apr/Dec 2012–2015 | Long and short rains |
| Environmental layers | Evapotranspiration | Raster (processed) | MOD 16 | 2012–2015 | 1 km |
| Soil type | Raster (processed) | Soil Survey of Kenya | Revised 1997 | 1:50, 000 | |
| Elevation | Raster (processed) | USGS | N/A | 30 m | |
| NDVI | Raster (processed) | University of Natural Resources and Life Science, Vienna | 2001–2015 | 250 m | |
| Africlim | Raster (processed) | The university of York | 1961–1990 | 1 km |
Fig. 7Flowchart showing the included variables and methods.
| Subject area | |
| More specific subject area | |
| Type of data | |
| How data was acquired | |
| Data format | |
| Experimental factors | |
| Experimental features | |
| Data source location | |
| Data accessibility |