Julie Bury1, Chris Littlewood2,3. 1. Doncaster & Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Physiotherapy Depertment, Doncaster Royal Infirmary, Doncaster, UK. 2. School of Health & Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. 3. Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences and Keele Clinical Trials Unit, David Weatherall Building, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Shoulder pain is a common musculoskeletal presentation, with disorders of the rotator cuff (RC) regarded as the most frequent cause. Conservative treatment is often the initial management; however, findings from a previous survey showed considerable variations in clinical practice, including the use of modalities that are not supported in the literature, suggesting that research is not impacting on practice. The present study aimed to survey current UK physiotherapy practice for the management of RC disorders and to determine whether this has changed over the 5-year period since the last survey was conducted. METHODS: A cross-sectional online survey of UK physiotherapists was conducted. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-one respondents completed the survey which showed that advice/education and some form of exercise therapy are most commonly used as a management strategy for RC disorders. There is a lack of agreement however regarding exercise prescription. The survey suggests less use of passive modalities, indicating that practice has advanced over the last 5 years in line with the current evidence. CONCLUSIONS: The present study has highlighted that the clinical practice of the survey respondents was in line with current recommendations from research. Hence, in contrast to the survey conducted 5 years previously, research appears to be impacting on practice, which is a positive finding.
BACKGROUND: Shoulder pain is a common musculoskeletal presentation, with disorders of the rotator cuff (RC) regarded as the most frequent cause. Conservative treatment is often the initial management; however, findings from a previous survey showed considerable variations in clinical practice, including the use of modalities that are not supported in the literature, suggesting that research is not impacting on practice. The present study aimed to survey current UK physiotherapy practice for the management of RC disorders and to determine whether this has changed over the 5-year period since the last survey was conducted. METHODS: A cross-sectional online survey of UK physiotherapists was conducted. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-one respondents completed the survey which showed that advice/education and some form of exercise therapy are most commonly used as a management strategy for RC disorders. There is a lack of agreement however regarding exercise prescription. The survey suggests less use of passive modalities, indicating that practice has advanced over the last 5 years in line with the current evidence. CONCLUSIONS: The present study has highlighted that the clinical practice of the survey respondents was in line with current recommendations from research. Hence, in contrast to the survey conducted 5 years previously, research appears to be impacting on practice, which is a positive finding.
Authors: Gandikota Girish; Lucas G Lobo; Jon A Jacobson; Yoav Morag; Bruce Miller; David A Jamadar Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: L Linsell; J Dawson; K Zondervan; P Rose; T Randall; R Fitzpatrick; A Carr Journal: Rheumatology (Oxford) Date: 2005-11-01 Impact factor: 7.580
Authors: Angela Cadogan; Mark Laslett; Wayne A Hing; Peter J McNair; Mark H Coates Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2011-05-28 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Valentina Scalise; Fabrizio Brindisino; Leonardo Pellicciari; Silvia Minnucci; Francesca Bonetti Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-02-18 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Sourav Bhattacharjee; D Ceri Davies; Jane C Holland; Jonathan M Holmes; David Kilroy; Imelda M McGonnell; Alison L Reynolds Journal: J Anat Date: 2021-10-24 Impact factor: 2.610