Literature DB >> 29276127

Feature-Specific Organization of Feedback Pathways in Mouse Visual Cortex.

Carey Y L Huh1, John P Peach2, Corbett Bennett3, Roxana M Vega4, Shaul Hestrin4.   

Abstract

Higher and lower cortical areas in the visual hierarchy are reciprocally connected [1]. Although much is known about how feedforward pathways shape receptive field properties of visual neurons, relatively little is known about the role of feedback pathways in visual processing. Feedback pathways are thought to carry top-down signals, including information about context (e.g., figure-ground segmentation and surround suppression) [2-5], and feedback has been demonstrated to sharpen orientation tuning of neurons in the primary visual cortex (V1) [6, 7]. However, the response characteristics of feedback neurons themselves and how feedback shapes V1 neurons' tuning for other features, such as spatial frequency (SF), remain largely unknown. Here, using a retrograde virus, targeted electrophysiological recordings, and optogenetic manipulations, we show that putatively feedback neurons in layer 5 (hereafter "L5 feedback") in higher visual areas, AL (anterolateral area) and PM (posteromedial area), display distinct visual properties in awake head-fixed mice. AL L5 feedback neurons prefer significantly lower SF (mean: 0.04 cycles per degree [cpd]) compared to PM L5 feedback neurons (0.15 cpd). Importantly, silencing AL L5 feedback reduced visual responses of V1 neurons preferring low SF (mean change in firing rate: -8.0%), whereas silencing PM L5 feedback suppressed responses of high-SF-preferring V1 neurons (-20.4%). These findings suggest that feedback connections from higher visual areas convey distinctly tuned visual inputs to V1 that serve to boost V1 neurons' responses to SF. Such like-to-like functional organization may represent an important feature of feedback pathways in sensory systems and in the nervous system in general.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CAV2-Cre; anterolateral area; extrastriate cortex; feedback; optogenetics; posteromedial area; retrograde tracing; spatial frequency tuning; vision; visual cortex

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29276127      PMCID: PMC5760293          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.11.056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  18 in total

1.  Apparent Motion Induces Activity Suppression in Early Visual Cortex and Impairs Visual Detection.

Authors:  Lu Shen; Biao Han; Floris P de Lange
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Higher order visual areas enhance stimulus responsiveness in mouse primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Matthijs N Oude Lohuis; Alexis Cervan Canton; Cyriel M A Pennartz; Umberto Olcese
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 4.861

3.  Extraction of Distinct Neuronal Cell Types from within a Genetically Continuous Population.

Authors:  Euiseok J Kim; Zhuzhu Zhang; Ling Huang; Tony Ito-Cole; Matthew W Jacobs; Ashley L Juavinett; Gokhan Senturk; Mo Hu; Manching Ku; Joseph R Ecker; Edward M Callaway
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Top-Down Feedback Controls the Cortical Representation of Illusory Contours in Mouse Primary Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Alexandr Pak; Esther Ryu; Claudia Li; Alexander A Chubykin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Cortical layer-specific critical dynamics triggering perception.

Authors:  James H Marshel; Yoon Seok Kim; Timothy A Machado; Sean Quirin; Brandon Benson; Jonathan Kadmon; Cephra Raja; Adelaida Chibukhchyan; Charu Ramakrishnan; Masatoshi Inoue; Janelle C Shane; Douglas J McKnight; Susumu Yoshizawa; Hideaki E Kato; Surya Ganguli; Karl Deisseroth
Journal:  Science       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Functional Differentiation of Mouse Visual Cortical Areas Depends upon Early Binocular Experience.

Authors:  Kirstie J Salinas; Carey Y L Huh; Jack H Zeitoun; Sunil P Gandhi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-12-29       Impact factor: 6.709

7.  Organization of feedback projections to mouse primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Mai M Morimoto; Emi Uchishiba; Aman B Saleem
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-04-17

8.  The essential role of recurrent processing for figure-ground perception in mice.

Authors:  Lisa Kirchberger; Sreedeep Mukherjee; Ulf H Schnabel; Enny H van Beest; Areg Barsegyan; Christiaan N Levelt; J Alexander Heimel; Jeannette A M Lorteije; Chris van der Togt; Matthew W Self; Pieter R Roelfsema
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 14.136

Review 9.  Evaluating the neurophysiological evidence for predictive processing as a model of perception.

Authors:  Kevin S Walsh; David P McGovern; Andy Clark; Redmond G O'Connell
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2020-03-08       Impact factor: 5.691

10.  Adolescent frontal top-down neurons receive heightened local drive to establish adult attentional behavior in mice.

Authors:  Elisa M Nabel; Yury Garkun; Hiroyuki Koike; Masato Sadahiro; Ana Liang; Kevin J Norman; Giulia Taccheri; Michael P Demars; Susanna Im; Keaven Caro; Sarah Lopez; Julia Bateh; Patrick R Hof; Roger L Clem; Hirofumi Morishita
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.