Literature DB >> 29276041

Cost-effectiveness of posterior lumbar interbody fusion in the Japanese universal health insurance system.

Takahito Fujimori1, Toshitada Miwa2, Motoki Iwasaki3, Takenori Oda4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Globally, the cost-effectiveness of spinal surgery is becoming increasingly important. However, these data are limited to a few countries. The purpose of our study was to examine the cost/quality adjusted life year (cost/QALY) gained for posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in the Japanese universal health insurance system.
METHODS: Fifty five patients underwent PLIF for lumbar degenerative spinal canal stenosis between July 2013 and September 2015 was included. Effectiveness was measured using Euro QOL 5-dimension (EQ-5D), Short-Form 8 physical component summary (PCS), and visual analog scale (VAS). The cost was calculated from the perspective of the public healthcare payer. Effectiveness and cost were measured one year after surgery. QALYs were calculated by multiplying the utility value (EQ-5D) and life years. Only direct costs were included on the basis of actual reimbursements. Cost/QALY at a 5-year time horizon with a 2% discount rate was estimated. Sensitivity analysis was performed by varying the time horizon (2 years or 10 years). The exchange rate was defined as US $1 to Japanese 100 yen.
RESULTS: Mean total cost one year after surgery was ¥2,802,900 ($28029). Operative cost was ¥1,779,700 ($17797). Mean gained score was 0.22 in EQ-5D, 10.3 in PCS, and -44 in VAS. Cost/QALY was ¥2,697,500 ($26975). Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that cost/QALY at a 10-year time horizon was ¥1,428,300 ($14283) and that cost/QALY at a 2-year time horizon was ¥6,435,400 ($64354).
CONCLUSIONS: Clinical outcomes after PLIF improved beyond minimum clinical improvement difference. Cost/QALY was below the widely-accepted benchmark (cost/QALY < $50000). PLIF could be regarded as cost-effective interventions.
Copyright © 2017 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29276041     DOI: 10.1016/j.jos.2017.11.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sci        ISSN: 0949-2658            Impact factor:   1.601


  3 in total

1.  Responsiveness of the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire, the Oswestry Disability Index, the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire, the 8-Item Short Form Health Survey, and the Euroqol 5 dimensions 5 level in the assessment of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Takahito Fujimori; Daisuke Ikegami; Tsuyoshi Sugiura; Hironobu Sakaura
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 2.721

Review 2.  Cost-effectiveness and Safety of Interspinous Process Decompression (Superion).

Authors:  Kevin Cairns; Tim Deer; Dawood Sayed; Kim van Noort; Kevin Liang
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 3.750

3.  Cost-Utility Analysis of Sacroiliac Joint Fusion in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Multi-Level Lumbar Fusion to the Sacrum.

Authors:  Stacey J Ackerman; Gurvinder S Deol; David W Polly
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2022-08-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.