Literature DB >> 29275975

Daily review of AHRQ patient safety indicators has important impact on value-based purchasing, reimbursement, and performance scores.

Michelle C Nguyen1, Susan D Moffatt-Bruce2, Anne Van Buren2, Iahn Gonsenhauser2, Daniel S Eiferman2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs) Composite (PSI 90) of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality has been found to have low positive predictive values. Because scores can affect hospital reimbursement and ranking, our institution designed a review process to ensure accurate data and incur minimal penalties under the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program.
METHODS: A multidisciplinary team was assembled to review PSI 90 within a performance period. The positive predictive value of each PSI was calculated. Weight-adjusted PSI rates were used to recalculate the PSI 90 Performance Period Index Value (PPIV). The adjusted PPIV was used to estimate what the achievement points and financial impact would have been if PSI review had not been implemented. Differences in PPIV, achievement points, and financial impact before and after PSI review were calculated.
RESULTS: A total of 1,470 cases were flagged for PSI over a 2-year period. The positive predictive value was 63.3%. Refuting 36.7% of PSIs resulted in a decrease in the PPIV from 0.696 to 0.508, an increase in achievement points from 5 to 10, resulting in a decreased net loss of $111,773.
CONCLUSION: Multidisciplinary review processes are practical and effective in identifying false-positive patient safety events. The real-time process affects hospital performance and resultant Medicare reimbursement substantially. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29275975     DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.10.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  6 in total

1.  Increasing Numbers and Reported Adverse Events in Patients with Lung Cancer Undergoing Inpatient Lung Biopsies: A Population-Based Analysis.

Authors:  Mitchell S von Itzstein; Arjun Gupta; Kristin C Mara; Sahil Khanna; David E Gerber
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 2.584

2.  Patient Safety Indicators are an insufficient performance metric to track and grade outcomes of open aortic repair.

Authors:  Rebecca Sorber; Katherine A Giuliano; Caitlin W Hicks; James H Black
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 4.268

3.  Predictive Value Positive of MTM Eligibility Criteria under MMA and ACA in Identifying Individuals with Medication Utilization Issues.

Authors:  Yanru Qiao; Christina A Spivey; Junling Wang; Ya-Chen Tina Shih; Jim Y Wan; Julie Kuhle; Samuel Dagogo-Jack; William C Cushman; Marie Chisholm-Burns
Journal:  J Pharm Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-09-07

4.  Increased reporting but decreased mortality associated with adverse events in patients undergoing lung cancer surgery: Competing forces in an era of heightened focus on care quality?

Authors:  Mitchell S von Itzstein; Arjun Gupta; Kemp H Kernstine; Kristin C Mara; Sahil Khanna; David E Gerber
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Feasibility of Capturing Adverse Events From Insurance Claims Data Using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Codes Coupled to Present on Admission Indicators.

Authors:  Juyoung Kim; Eun Young Choi; Won Lee; Hae Mi Oh; Jeehee Pyo; Minsu Ock; So Yoon Kim; Sang-Il Lee
Journal:  J Patient Saf       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 2.243

Review 6.  U.S. hospital performance methodologies: a scoping review to identify opportunities for crossing the quality chasm.

Authors:  Kelly J Thomas Craig; Mollie M McKillop; Hu T Huang; Judy George; Ekta S Punwani; Kyu B Rhee
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 2.655

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.