| Literature DB >> 29275856 |
Brian Kirkpatrick1, Jay B Saoud2, Gregory P Strauss3, Anthony O Ahmed4, Kazunori Tatsumi5, Mark Opler5, Remy Luthringer6, Michael Davidson6.
Abstract
The Brief Negative Symptom Scale (BNSS) grew out of a recommendation by the NIMH-sponsored Consensus Development Conference on Negative Symptoms that a scale based on contemporary concepts be developed. We assessed sensitivity to change of the BNSS in a trial of MIN-101, which showed efficacy for negative symptoms (PANSS pentagonal model) at daily doses of 32 and 64mg/day. Using mixed-effects model for repeated measures, we examined change in BNSS total score and in the BNSS factors of anhedonia/avolition/asociality (AAA), and expressivity (EXP). Compared to placebo, the 64mg group (N=83) showed a significant decrease in BNSS total score (effect size d [ES] 0.56, p<0.01) and both factor scores (AAA ES=0.48, EXP ES=0.46, p<0.02 for both). Patients in the trial had minimal depression and positive symptom scores; covarying for disorganization, positive symptoms, or anxiety/depression did not cause a meaningful change in the significance of the BNSS total or factor scores in this group. The 32mg group (N=78) did not differ significantly from placebo (N=83) on BNSS total score (ES=0.33, p<0.09), AAA (ES=0.25, p<0.20) or EXP (ES=0.30, p<0.12) scores. These results demonstrate the BNSS is sensitive to change.Entities:
Keywords: Factor analysis; Negative symptoms; Psychometrics; Schizophrenia; Treatment
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29275856 DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2017.11.031
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Schizophr Res ISSN: 0920-9964 Impact factor: 4.939