Literature DB >> 29275493

Automatic Decision Support for Clinical Diagnostic Literature Using Link Analysis in a Weighted Keyword Network.

Shuqing Li1, Ying Sun2, Dagobert Soergel2.   

Abstract

We present a novel approach to recommending articles from the medical literature that support clinical diagnostic decision-making, giving detailed descriptions of the associated ideas and principles. The specific goal is to retrieve biomedical articles that help answer questions of a specified type about a particular case. Based on the filtered keywords, MeSH(Medical Subject Headings) lexicon and the automatically extracted acronyms, the relationship between keywords and articles was built. The paper gives a detailed description of the process of by which keywords were measured and relevant articles identified based on link analysis in a weighted keywords network. Some important challenges identified in this study include the extraction of diagnosis-related keywords and a collection of valid sentences based on the keyword co-occurrence analysis and existing descriptions of symptoms. All data were taken from medical articles provided in the TREC (Text Retrieval Conference) clinical decision support track 2015. Ten standard topics and one demonstration topic were tested. In each case, a maximum of five articles with the highest relevance were returned. The total user satisfaction of 3.98 was 33% higher than average. The results also suggested that the smaller the number of results, the higher the average satisfaction. However, a few shortcomings were also revealed since medical literature recommendation for clinical diagnostic decision support is so complex a topic that it cannot be fully addressed through the semantic information carried solely by keywords in existing descriptions of symptoms. Nevertheless, the fact that these articles are actually relevant will no doubt inspire future research.

Keywords:  Clinical decision support; Keyword co-occurrence analysis; Link analysis; Literature recommendation service

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29275493     DOI: 10.1007/s10916-017-0876-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Syst        ISSN: 0148-5598            Impact factor:   4.460


  14 in total

1.  ADAM: another database of abbreviations in MEDLINE.

Authors:  Wei Zhou; Vetle I Torvik; Neil R Smalheiser
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-09-18       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Probabilistic diagnosis using a reformulation of the INTERNIST-1/QMR knowledge base. I. The probabilistic model and inference algorithms.

Authors:  M A Shwe; B Middleton; D E Heckerman; M Henrion; E J Horvitz; H P Lehmann; G F Cooper
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 2.176

3.  Customization in a unified framework for summarizing medical literature.

Authors:  N Elhadad; M-Y Kan; J L Klavans; K R McKeown
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.326

Review 4.  Effects of clinical decision-support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a synthesis of high-quality systematic review findings.

Authors:  Monique W M Jaspers; Marian Smeulers; Hester Vermeulen; Linda W Peute
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Development and evaluation of a comprehensive clinical decision support taxonomy: comparison of front-end tools in commercial and internally developed electronic health record systems.

Authors:  Adam Wright; Dean F Sittig; Joan S Ash; Joshua Feblowitz; Seth Meltzer; Carmit McMullen; Ken Guappone; Jim Carpenter; Joshua Richardson; Linas Simonaitis; R Scott Evans; W Paul Nichol; Blackford Middleton
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Accuracy of a computerized clinical decision-support system for asthma assessment and management.

Authors:  Laura J Hoeksema; Alia Bazzy-Asaad; Edwin A Lomotan; Diana E Edmonds; Gabriela Ramírez-Garnica; Richard N Shiffman; Leora I Horwitz
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Factors influencing alert acceptance: a novel approach for predicting the success of clinical decision support.

Authors:  Hanna M Seidling; Shobha Phansalkar; Diane L Seger; Marilyn D Paterno; Shimon Shaykevich; Walter E Haefeli; David W Bates
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Effect of computerized clinical decision support on the use and yield of CT pulmonary angiography in the emergency department.

Authors:  Ali S Raja; Ivan K Ip; Luciano M Prevedello; Aaron D Sodickson; Cameron Farkas; Richard D Zane; Richard Hanson; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Ritu R Gill; Ramin Khorasani
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Electronic health records and clinical decision support systems: impact on national ambulatory care quality.

Authors:  Max J Romano; Randall S Stafford
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2011-01-24

Review 10.  The introduction of a diagnostic decision support system (DXplain™) into the workflow of a teaching hospital service can decrease the cost of service for diagnostically challenging Diagnostic Related Groups (DRGs).

Authors:  Peter L Elkin; Mark Liebow; Brent A Bauer; Swarna Chaliki; Dietlind Wahner-Roedler; John Bundrick; Mark Lee; Steven H Brown; David Froehling; Kent Bailey; Kathleen Famiglietti; Richard Kim; Ed Hoffer; Mitchell Feldman; G Octo Barnett
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 4.046

View more
  1 in total

1.  An improved BM25 algorithm for clinical decision support in Precision Medicine based on co-word analysis and Cuckoo Search.

Authors:  Zicheng Zhang
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 2.796

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.