Hideaki Miyake1, Yuto Matsushita2, Keita Tamura2, Daisuke Motoyama2, Toshiki Ito2, Takayuki Sugiyama2, Atsushi Otsuka2. 1. Department of Urology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi-Ku, Hamamatsu, 431-3192, Japan. hideakimiyake@hotmail.com. 2. Department of Urology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi-Ku, Hamamatsu, 431-3192, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To investigate whether the response to an androgen receptor-axis-targeted (ARAT) agent is associated with the efficacy of subsequent docetaxel in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. METHODS: This study included 114 consecutive mCRPC patients, comprising 54 and 60 patients who progressed with abiraterone acetate (AA) and enzalutamide (Enz), respectively, before the introduction of docetaxel. The impact of the response to either ARAT agent on the activity of docetaxel was assessed. RESULTS: Following ARAT therapy, a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response was observed in 73 of the 114 patients, of whom 33 and 40 received AA and Enz, respectively. In the 114 patients, PSA response to docetaxel was achieved in 48 (42.1%) patients, and median PSA progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with docetaxel were 7.2 and 17.5 months, respectively. No significant difference was noted in PSA response rate, PSA PFS or OS with docetaxel between responders and non-responders to a prior ARAT agent in the overall 114 patients, 54 receiving AA and 60 receiving Enz. Despite the absence of a significant impact of the response to a prior ARAT agent on PSA PFS or OS by univariate analysis, independent prognostic predictors were identified by multivariate analysis, as performance status (PS) for PSA PFS, and PS and visceral metastasis for OS. CONCLUSIONS: Disease control by docetaxel may not be affected by the response to a prior ARAT agent. Therefore, a prior response to an ARAT agent should not influence the decision on the subsequent introduction of docetaxel for mCRPC patients.
BACKGROUND: To investigate whether the response to an androgen receptor-axis-targeted (ARAT) agent is associated with the efficacy of subsequent docetaxel in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. METHODS: This study included 114 consecutive mCRPC patients, comprising 54 and 60 patients who progressed with abiraterone acetate (AA) and enzalutamide (Enz), respectively, before the introduction of docetaxel. The impact of the response to either ARAT agent on the activity of docetaxel was assessed. RESULTS: Following ARAT therapy, a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response was observed in 73 of the 114 patients, of whom 33 and 40 received AA and Enz, respectively. In the 114 patients, PSA response to docetaxel was achieved in 48 (42.1%) patients, and median PSA progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with docetaxel were 7.2 and 17.5 months, respectively. No significant difference was noted in PSA response rate, PSA PFS or OS with docetaxel between responders and non-responders to a prior ARAT agent in the overall 114 patients, 54 receiving AA and 60 receiving Enz. Despite the absence of a significant impact of the response to a prior ARAT agent on PSA PFS or OS by univariate analysis, independent prognostic predictors were identified by multivariate analysis, as performance status (PS) for PSA PFS, and PS and visceral metastasis for OS. CONCLUSIONS: Disease control by docetaxel may not be affected by the response to a prior ARAT agent. Therefore, a prior response to an ARAT agent should not influence the decision on the subsequent introduction of docetaxel for mCRPC patients.
Entities:
Keywords:
Abiraterone acetate; Docetaxel; Enzalutamide; Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer
Authors: Rahul Aggarwal; Anna Harris; Carl Formaker; Eric J Small; Arturo Molina; Thomas W Griffin; Charles J Ryan Journal: Clin Genitourin Cancer Date: 2014-03-28 Impact factor: 2.872
Authors: Howard I Scher; Karim Fizazi; Fred Saad; Mary-Ellen Taplin; Cora N Sternberg; Kurt Miller; Ronald de Wit; Peter Mulders; Kim N Chi; Neal D Shore; Andrew J Armstrong; Thomas W Flaig; Aude Fléchon; Paul Mainwaring; Mark Fleming; John D Hainsworth; Mohammad Hirmand; Bryan Selby; Lynn Seely; Johann S de Bono Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-08-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ian F Tannock; Ronald de Wit; William R Berry; Jozsef Horti; Anna Pluzanska; Kim N Chi; Stephane Oudard; Christine Théodore; Nicholas D James; Ingela Turesson; Mark A Rosenthal; Mario A Eisenberger Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-10-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Howard I Scher; Susan Halabi; Ian Tannock; Michael Morris; Cora N Sternberg; Michael A Carducci; Mario A Eisenberger; Celestia Higano; Glenn J Bubley; Robert Dreicer; Daniel Petrylak; Philip Kantoff; Ethan Basch; William Kevin Kelly; William D Figg; Eric J Small; Tomasz M Beer; George Wilding; Alison Martin; Maha Hussain Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-03-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: John M Fitzpatrick; Joaquim Bellmunt; Karim Fizazi; Axel Heidenreich; Cora N Sternberg; Bertrand Tombal; Antonio Alcaraz; Amit Bahl; Sergio Bracarda; Giuseppe Di Lorenzo; Eleni Efstathiou; Stephen P Finn; Sophie Fosså; Silke Gillessen; Pirkko-Liisa Kellokumpu-Lehtinen; Frédéric E Lecouvet; Stephane Oudard; Theo M de Reijke; Craig N Robson; Maria De Santis; Bostjan Seruga; Ronald de Wit Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2014-04-03 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Johann S de Bono; Matthew R Smith; Fred Saad; Dana E Rathkopf; Peter F A Mulders; Eric J Small; Neal D Shore; Karim Fizazi; Peter De Porre; Thian Kheoh; Jinhui Li; Mary B Todd; Charles J Ryan; Thomas W Flaig Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2016-07-09 Impact factor: 20.096