Ahmed A Hussein1, Paul R May1, Zhe Jing1, Youssef E Ahmed1, Carl J Wijburg1, Abdulla Erdem Canda1, Prokar Dasgupta1, Mohammad Shamim Khan1, Mani Menon1, James O Peabody1, Abolfazl Hosseini1, John Kelly1, Alexandre Mottrie1, Jihad Kaouk1, Ashok Hemal1, Peter Wiklund1, Khurshid A Guru2. 1. Roswell Park Cancer Institute (AAH, PRM, ZJ, YEA, KAG), Buffalo, New York; Cairo University (AAH), Cairo, Egypt; Rijnstate Hospital (CJW), Arnhem, The Netherlands; Ankara Ataturk Training and Research Hospital (AEC), Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey; Guy's Hospital and King's College London School of Medicine (PD, MSK), London, United Kingdom; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London (JKe), London, United Kingdom; Henry Ford Health System (MM, JOP), Detroit, Michigan; Karolinska University Hospital (AHo), Stockholm, Sweden; Onze-Lieve-Vrouw Ziekenhuis (AM), Aalast, Belgium; Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute (JKa), Cleveland Clinic, Ohio; Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center (AHe), Winston-Salem, North Carolina. 2. Roswell Park Cancer Institute (AAH, PRM, ZJ, YEA, KAG), Buffalo, New York; Cairo University (AAH), Cairo, Egypt; Rijnstate Hospital (CJW), Arnhem, The Netherlands; Ankara Ataturk Training and Research Hospital (AEC), Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey; Guy's Hospital and King's College London School of Medicine (PD, MSK), London, United Kingdom; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London (JKe), London, United Kingdom; Henry Ford Health System (MM, JOP), Detroit, Michigan; Karolinska University Hospital (AHo), Stockholm, Sweden; Onze-Lieve-Vrouw Ziekenhuis (AM), Aalast, Belgium; Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute (JKa), Cleveland Clinic, Ohio; Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center (AHe), Winston-Salem, North Carolina. Electronic address: Khurshid.guru@roswellpark.org.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study aimed to provide an update and compare perioperative outcomes and complications of intracorporeal and extracorporeal urinary diversion following robot-assisted radical cystectomy using data from the multi-institutional, prospectively maintained International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium database. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 2,125 patients from a total of 26 institutions. Intracorporeal urinary diversion was compared with extracorporeal urinary diversion. Multivariate logistic regression models using stepwise variable selection were fit to evaluate preoperative, operative and postoperative predictors of intracorporeal urinary diversion, operative time, high grade complications and 90-day hospital readmissions after robot-assisted radical cystectomy. RESULTS: In our cohort 1,094 patients (51%) underwent intracorporeal urinary diversion. These patients demonstrated shorter operative time (357 vs 400 minutes), less blood loss (300 vs 350 ml) and fewer blood transfusions (4% vs 19%, all p <0.001). They experienced more high grade complications (13% vs 10%, p = 0.02). Intracorporeal urinary diversion use increased from 9% of all urinary diversions in 2005 to 97% in 2015. Complications after this procedure decreased significantly with time (p <0.001). On multivariable analysis higher annual cystectomy volume (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.03, p <0.002), year of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (2013-2016 OR 68, 95% CI 44-105, p <0.001) and American Society of Anesthesiologists® score less than 3 (OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.38-2.22, p <0.001) were associated with undergoing intracorporeal urinary diversion. The procedure was associated with a shorter operative time of 27 minutes (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The use of intracorporeal urinary diversion has increased in the last decade. A higher annual institutional volume of robot-assisted radical cystectomy was associated with intracorporeal urinary diversion as well as with shorter operative time. Although intracorporeal urinary diversion was associated with higher grade complications than extracorporeal urinary diversion, they decreased with time.
PURPOSE: This study aimed to provide an update and compare perioperative outcomes and complications of intracorporeal and extracorporeal urinary diversion following robot-assisted radical cystectomy using data from the multi-institutional, prospectively maintained International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium database. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 2,125 patients from a total of 26 institutions. Intracorporeal urinary diversion was compared with extracorporeal urinary diversion. Multivariate logistic regression models using stepwise variable selection were fit to evaluate preoperative, operative and postoperative predictors of intracorporeal urinary diversion, operative time, high grade complications and 90-day hospital readmissions after robot-assisted radical cystectomy. RESULTS: In our cohort 1,094 patients (51%) underwent intracorporeal urinary diversion. These patients demonstrated shorter operative time (357 vs 400 minutes), less blood loss (300 vs 350 ml) and fewer blood transfusions (4% vs 19%, all p <0.001). They experienced more high grade complications (13% vs 10%, p = 0.02). Intracorporeal urinary diversion use increased from 9% of all urinary diversions in 2005 to 97% in 2015. Complications after this procedure decreased significantly with time (p <0.001). On multivariable analysis higher annual cystectomy volume (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.03, p <0.002), year of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (2013-2016 OR 68, 95% CI 44-105, p <0.001) and American Society of Anesthesiologists® score less than 3 (OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.38-2.22, p <0.001) were associated with undergoing intracorporeal urinary diversion. The procedure was associated with a shorter operative time of 27 minutes (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The use of intracorporeal urinary diversion has increased in the last decade. A higher annual institutional volume of robot-assisted radical cystectomy was associated with intracorporeal urinary diversion as well as with shorter operative time. Although intracorporeal urinary diversion was associated with higher grade complications than extracorporeal urinary diversion, they decreased with time.
Authors: Karthik Tanneru; Seyed Behzad Jazayeri; Jatinder Kumar; Muhammad Umar Alam; Daniel Norez; Sabine Nguyen; Soroush Bazargani; Hariharan Palayapalayam Ganapathi; Mark Bandyk; Robert Marino; Shahriar Koochekpour; Shiva Gautam; K C Balaji; Joseph Costa Journal: J Robot Surg Date: 2020-11-22
Authors: James W F Catto; Pramit Khetrapal; Federico Ricciardi; Gareth Ambler; Norman R Williams; Tarek Al-Hammouri; Muhammad Shamim Khan; Ramesh Thurairaja; Rajesh Nair; Andrew Feber; Simon Dixon; Senthil Nathan; Tim Briggs; Ashwin Sridhar; Imran Ahmad; Jaimin Bhatt; Philip Charlesworth; Christopher Blick; Marcus G Cumberbatch; Syed A Hussain; Sanjeev Kotwal; Anthony Koupparis; John McGrath; Aidan P Noon; Edward Rowe; Nikhil Vasdev; Vishwanath Hanchanale; Daryl Hagan; Chris Brew-Graves; John D Kelly Journal: JAMA Date: 2022-06-07 Impact factor: 157.335
Authors: Louis Lenfant; Gregory Verhoest; Riccardo Campi; Jérôme Parra; Vivien Graffeille; Alexandra Masson-Lecomte; Dimitri Vordos; Alexandre de La Taille; Mathieu Roumiguie; Marine Lesourd; Lionel Taksin; Vincent Misraï; Pietro Grande; Christophe Vaessen; Guillaume Ploussard; Benjamin Granger; Morgan Rouprêt Journal: World J Urol Date: 2018-05-09 Impact factor: 4.226