Literature DB >> 29275105

Preferred and Perceived Participation of Younger and Older Patients in Decision Making About Treatment for Early Breast Cancer: A Prospective Study.

Victoria C Hamelinck1, Esther Bastiaannet2, Arwen H Pieterse3, Cornelis J H van de Velde1, Gerrit-Jan Liefers1, Anne M Stiggelbout4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Older patients are believed to prefer a more passive role in treatment decision making, but studies reporting this relation were conducted over a decade ago or were retrospective. We prospectively compared younger (40-64 years) versus older (≥ 65 years) breast cancer patients' preferences for decision-making roles and their perceived actual roles. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective multicenter study was conducted in Leiden, The Hague, and Tilburg over a 2-year period. Early-stage breast cancer patients were surveyed about their preferred and perceived decision-making roles (active, shared, or passive) concerning surgery type (breast-conserving vs. mastectomy) (n = 74), adjuvant chemotherapy (aCT, n = 43), and adjuvant hormonal therapy (aHT, n = 39).
RESULTS: For all decisions, both age groups most frequently preferred a shared role before consultation, except for decisions about aHT, for which younger patients more commonly preferred an active role. The proportion of patients favoring an active or passive role in each decision was lower for the older than the younger patients, but none of the differences was significant. Regarding perceived actual roles, both groups most frequently reported an active role in the surgical decision after consultation. In deciding about both aCT and aHT, a larger proportion of older patients perceived having had a passive role compared to younger patients, and a greater proportion of younger patients perceived having been active. Again, differences were not statistically significant.
CONCLUSION: Most older patients preferred to decide together with their clinician, but preferences varied widely. Older patients more often than younger patients perceived they had not been involved in decisions about systemic therapy. Clinicians should invite all patients to participate in decision making and elicit their preferred role.
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adjuvant therapy; Geriatric oncology; Patient involvement; Shared decision making; Surgery

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29275105     DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2017.11.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer        ISSN: 1526-8209            Impact factor:   3.225


  8 in total

1.  How are patient-related characteristics associated with shared decision-making about treatment? A scoping review of quantitative studies.

Authors:  Sascha M Keij; Joyce E de Boer; Anne M Stiggelbout; Wändi Bruine de Bruin; Ellen Peters; Saïda Moaddine; Marleen Kunneman; Arwen H Pieterse
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 3.006

2.  Guideline-Recommended Chemoradiation for Patients With Rectal Cancer at Large Hospitals: A Trend in the Right Direction.

Authors:  Natalie J Del Vecchio; Jennifer A Schlichting; Catherine Chioreso; Amanda R Kahl; Jennifer E Hrabe; Charles F Lynch; Michele M West; Mary E Charlton
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  "Will It Affect Our Chances of Having Children?" and Feeling "Like a Ticking Bomb" -The Fertility Concerns and Fears of Cancer Progression and Recurrence in Cancer Treatment Decision-Making Among Young Women Diagnosed With Gynaecological or Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Aleksandra Sobota; Gozde Ozakinci
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-06-02

4.  Getting the right fit: Convergence between preferred and perceived involvement in treatment decision making among medical oncology outpatients.

Authors:  Elise Mansfield; Jamie Bryant; Mariko Carey; Heidi Turon; Frans Henskens; Alice Grady
Journal:  Health Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-06

5.  COMplot, A Graphical Presentation of Complication Profiles and Adverse Effects for the Curative Treatment of Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Tom van den Ende; Frank A Abe Nijenhuis; Héctor G van den Boorn; Emil Ter Veer; Maarten C C M Hulshof; Suzanne S Gisbertz; Martijn G H van Oijen; Hanneke W M van Laarhoven
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  Personalised medicine and the decision to withhold chemotherapy in early breast cancer with intermediate risk of recurrence - a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Susanna M Wallerstedt; Astrid Nilsson Ek; Roger Olofsson Bagge; Anikó Kovács; Annika Strandell; Barbro Linderholm
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Shared Decision-Making: A Cross-Sectional Study Assessing Patients Awareness and Preferences in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Afnan Aljaffary; Fatimah Alsheddi; Raghad Alzahrani; Somayyah Alamoudi; Mona Aljuwair; Sumaiah Alrawiai; Duaa Aljabri; Arwa Althumairi; Bayan Hariri; Arwa Alumran
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 2.314

8.  Factors Influencing the Onset of Neoadjuvant Therapy in Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Carolin Müller; Stephanie Juhasz-Böss; Gilda Schmidt; Erich-Franz Solomayer; Ingolf Juhasz-Böss; Georg-Peter Breitbach
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 2.860

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.