Literature DB >> 29274687

Assessment of the waste electrical and electronic equipment management systems profile and sustainability in developed and developing European Union countries.

Dumitrita Ibanescu1, Daniela Cailean Gavrilescu1, Carmen Teodosiu2, Silvia Fiore3.   

Abstract

The assessment of waste management systems for electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) from developed economies (Germany, Sweden and Italy) and developing countries (Romania and Bulgaria), is discussed covering the period 2007-2014. The WEEE management systems profiles are depicted by indicators correlated to WEEE life cycle stages: collection, transportation and treatment. The sustainability of national WEEE management systems in terms of greenhouse gas emissions is presented, together with the greenhouse gas efficiency indicator that underlines the efficiency of WEEE treatment options. In the countries comparisons, the key elements are: robust versus fragile economies, the overall waste management performance and the existence/development of suitable management practices on WEEE. Over the life cycle perspective, developed economies (Germany, Sweden and Italy) manage one order of magnitude higher quantities of WEEE compared to developing countries (Romania and Bulgaria). Although prevention and reduction measures are encouraged, all WEEE quantities were larger in 2013, than in 2007. In 2007-2014, developed economies exceed the annual European collection target of 4 kg WEEE/capita, while collection is still difficult in developing countries. If collection rates are estimated in relationship with products placed on market, than similar values are registered in Sweden and Bulgaria, followed by Germany and Italy and lastly Romania. WEEE transportation shows different patterns among countries, with Italy as the greatest exporter (in 2014), while Sweden treats the WEEE nationally. WEEE reuse is a common practice in Germany, Sweden (from 2009) and Bulgaria (from 2011). By 2014, recycling was the most preferred WEEE treatment option, with the same kind of rates performance, over 80%, irrespective of the country, with efforts in each of the countries in developing special collection points, recycling facilities and support instruments. The national total and the recycling carbon footprints of WEEE are lower in 2013 than in 2007 for each country, the order in reducing the environmental impacts being: Germany, Italy, Sweden, Bulgaria and Romania. The negative values indicate savings in greenhouse gas emissions. In 2013, the GHG efficiency shows no differences of the WEEE management in the developed and developing countries.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carbon footprint; EU; Sustainability; WEEE; Waste management profile

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29274687     DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.12.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Waste Manag        ISSN: 0956-053X            Impact factor:   7.145


  4 in total

1.  All-Waste Hybrid Composites with Waste Silicon Photovoltaic Module.

Authors:  Mihaela Cosnita; Ileana Manciulea; Cristina Cazan
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 4.329

2.  Simultaneous Recovery of Precious and Heavy Metal Ions from Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) Using Polymer Films Containing Cyphos IL 101.

Authors:  Katarzyna Witt; Włodzimierz Urbaniak; Małgorzata A Kaczorowska; Daria Bożejewicz
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 4.329

3.  Understanding consumers' perspectives of electronic waste in an emerging economy: a case study of New Delhi, India.

Authors:  Anwesha Borthakur; Pardeep Singh
Journal:  Energy Ecol Environ       Date:  2022-02-12

4.  Waste Electrical and Electronic Fund Policy: Current Status and Evaluation of Implementation in China.

Authors:  Xiao-Shan Yang; Xiao-Xue Zheng; Tian-Yu Zhang; Ying Du; Fengru Long
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.