Literature DB >> 29274453

Comparative Cohort Study of Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Implantation without Versus with Navigation in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Disc Disease.

Edward Fomekong1, Julien Pierrard1, Christian Raftopoulos2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The major limitation of computer-based three-dimensional fluoroscopy is increased radiation exposure of patients and operating room staff. Combining spine navigation with intraoperative three-dimensional fluoroscopy (io3DF) can likely overcome this shortcoming, while increasing pedicle screw accuracy rate. We compared data from a cohort of patients undergoing lumbar percutaneous pedicle screw placement using io3DF alone or in combination with spine navigation.
METHODS: This study consisted of 168 patients who underwent percutaneous pedicle screw implantation between 2009 and 2016. The primary endpoint was to compare pedicle screw accuracy between the 2 groups. Secondary endpoints were to compare radiation exposure of patients and operating room staff, duration of surgery, and postoperative complications.
RESULTS: In group 1, 438 screws were placed without navigation guidance; in group 2, 276 screws were placed with spine navigation. Mean patient age in both groups was 58.6 ± 14.1 years. The final pedicle accuracy rate was 97.9% in group 1 and 99.6% in group 2. Average radiation dose per patient was significantly larger in group 1 (571.9 mGym2) than in group 2 (365.6 mGym2) (P = 0.000088). Surgery duration and complication rate were not significantly different between the 2 groups (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: io3DF with spine navigation minimized radiation exposure of patients and operating room staff and provided an excellent percutaneous pedicle screw accuracy rate with no permanent complications compared with io3DF alone. This setup is recommended, especially for patients with a complex degenerative spine condition.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computer assisted fluoroscopy; Intraoperative 3D fluoroscopy; Pedicle screw accuracy; Percutaneous pedicle screw; Radiation rate; Spine navigation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29274453     DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.12.080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.104


  6 in total

Review 1.  Current state of minimally invasive spine surgery.

Authors:  Avani S Vaishnav; Yahya A Othman; Sohrab S Virk; Catherine Himo Gang; Sheeraz A Qureshi
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-06

2.  Multimodal Applications of 3D-Navigation in Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Impacts on Precision, Accuracy, Complications, and Radiation Exposure.

Authors:  Arvind G Kulkarni; Pritem A Rajamani; Sandeep Tapashetti; Tushar Sathish Kunder
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2022-07-14

3.  Decreasing radiation dose with FluoroLESS Standalone Anterior Cervical Fusion.

Authors:  Kingsley R Chin; Fabio J R Pencle; Kathleen A Quijada; Moawiah S Mustafa; Luai S Mustafa; Jason A Seale
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-12

4.  Surface Navigation and the Influence of Navigation on MIS Surgery.

Authors:  Ram K Alluri; Ahilan Sivaganesan; Avani S Vaishnav; Marcel Dupont; Sheeraz A Qureshi
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2022-04

Review 5.  Computed Tomography-Based Navigation System in Current Spine Surgery: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Nao Otomo; Haruki Funao; Kento Yamanouchi; Norihiro Isogai; Ken Ishii
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-02-05       Impact factor: 2.430

6.  Does MIS-TLIF or TLIF result in better pedicle screw placement accuracy and clinical outcomes with navigation guidance?

Authors:  Jia Bin Liu; Jun Long Wu; Rui Zuo; Chang Qing Li; Chao Zhang; Yue Zhou
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 2.362

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.