Literature DB >> 29274073

Investigation of the Use of a Family Health History Application in Genetic Counseling.

Meghan L Tipsword1,2, Peter S White3, Christine G Spaeth2, Richard F Ittenbach4, Melanie F Myers5,6,7.   

Abstract

The paper-based pedigree is the current standard for family health history (FHH) documentation in genetic counseling. Several tools for electronic capture of family health data have been developed to improve re-use and accessibility, data quality and standardization, ease of updating, and integration with electronic medical records. One such tool, the tablet-based Proband application, provides a flexible approach to data capture in dynamic and diverse clinical settings. This study compared Proband FHH collection to paper-based methods and investigated the usability of Proband in a clinical setting. After one use by 23 genetic counselors and students, Proband had 91% accuracy with a FHH audio scenario, which was significantly less (p < 0.001) than paper's 96% accuracy. These differences were attributed to incorrect or missing ages of grandparents (p < 0.001) and great-aunts/uncles (p = 0.012) and missing documentation of consanguinity (p < 0.001). Possible explanations for these differences include greater experience with paper FHH documentation and pre-populated prompts for consanguinity on the paper template used. Proband's perceived usability increased with use, with individual System Usability Scores increasing between first and last use (p = 0.033). We conclude that tools for dynamic, provider-driven FHH documentation such as Proband show promise for improving risk assessment accuracy and quality patient care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accuracy; Family health history; Pedigree; Proband; System usability scale; Usability

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29274073     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-017-0196-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  20 in total

Review 1.  The family medical history.

Authors:  Robin L Bennett
Journal:  Prim Care       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.907

2.  Evaluation of family history information within clinical documents and adequacy of HL7 clinical statement and clinical genomics family history models for its representation: a case report.

Authors:  Genevieve B Melton; Nandhini Raman; Elizabeth S Chen; Indra Neil Sarkar; Serguei Pakhomov; Robert D Madoff
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

Review 4.  The impact of the electronic medical record on structure, process, and outcomes within primary care: a systematic review of the evidence.

Authors:  Jayna M Holroyd-Leduc; Diane Lorenzetti; Sharon E Straus; Lindsay Sykes; Hude Quan
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Computers in the examination room and the electronic health record: physicians' perceived impact on clinical encounters before and after full installation and implementation.

Authors:  Richard J Doyle; Nina Wang; David Anthony; Jeffrey Borkan; Renee R Shield; Roberta E Goldman
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 2.267

6.  High-quality, standard, controlled healthcare terminologies come of age.

Authors:  J J Cimino
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 2.176

7.  Family history of stroke in patients with transient ischemic attack in relation to hypertension and other intermediate phenotypes.

Authors:  Enrico Flossmann; Peter M Rothwell
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2005-03-03       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Electronic health record functionality needed to better support primary care.

Authors:  Alex H Krist; John W Beasley; Jesse C Crosson; David C Kibbe; Michael S Klinkman; Christoph U Lehmann; Chester H Fox; Jason M Mitchell; James W Mold; Wilson D Pace; Kevin A Peterson; Robert L Phillips; Robert Post; Jon Puro; Michael Raddock; Ray Simkus; Steven E Waldren
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  Accuracy of medication documentation in hospital discharge summaries: A retrospective analysis of medication transcription errors in manual and electronic discharge summaries.

Authors:  Joanne Callen; Jean McIntosh; Julie Li
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2009-10-03       Impact factor: 4.046

10.  Trends in primary care clinician perceptions of a new electronic health record.

Authors:  Robert El-Kareh; Tejal K Gandhi; Eric G Poon; Lisa P Newmark; Jonathan Ungar; Stuart Lipsitz; Thomas D Sequist
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  What characterizes cancer family history collection tools? A critical literature review.

Authors:  J E Cleophat; H Nabi; S Pelletier; K Bouchard; M Dorval
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 3.677

2.  Introduction to the "Technology in Practice" Special Issue.

Authors:  Vickie Venne; Megan Doerr
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.537

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.