Literature DB >> 29273984

Comparative toxicity of azo dyes to two infaunal organisms (Hexagenia spp. and Tubifex tubifex) in spiked-sediment exposures.

Danielle Milani1, Adrienne J Bartlett2, Shane R de Solla3, Joanne L Parrott2, Kyna D Intini4, David Legault4, Jennifer Unsworth4, Vimal K Balakrishnan2.   

Abstract

Azo dyes are synthetic compounds used as industrial colorants, and some are predicted to be inherently toxic, bioaccumulative, and/or persistent based upon their chemical composition. This study addresses data gaps in current research which include the need to evaluate the toxicity of hydrophobic azo dyes to benthic invertebrates. The toxicity of a solvent dye, Sudan Red G (SRG), and two disperse dyes, Disperse Yellow 7 (DY7) and Disperse Orange 13 (DO13), to Hexagenia spp. and Tubifex tubifex was assessed in spiked-sediment exposures. The dye compounds appeared to degrade readily in the equilibrium and exposure periods, suggesting a limited persistence of the parent compounds in the environment under test conditions. Although azo dye degradation products could not be reliably quantified, one was detected in DY7 sediment samples that elicited toxic effects to Hexagenia and Tubifex, providing evidence that DY7 degrades. Hexagenia survival and growth endpoints responded with similar sensitivity to the dyes, but DY7 was the most toxic, with a 21-day IC25 (concentration associated with 25% inhibition) for growth of 9.6 μg/g. Comparatively, Tubifex reproduction was the most sensitive endpoint for all dyes with 28-day IC25s for young production ranging from 1.3 to 11.8 μg/g. At sublethal concentrations, toxic effects to Tubifex differed between dyes: the solvent dye exerted an effect primarily on gametogenesis (cocoon production), while disperse dyes, most notably DY7, caused effects on embryogenesis (development of worm inside the cocoon). This study indicates that there could be potential hazard to oligochaetes based on the observed effect concentrations, but given the lack of environmental measurements, the risk of these compounds is unknown. Further research is required to determine if degradation products were formed in all dye samples and whether toxicity was caused by the parent molecules, which have limited persistence under test conditions, or by their degradation products. To avoid underestimating toxicity, this study stresses the need to use an infaunal deposit feeder such as the oligochaete Tubifex in sediment toxicity assessments where highly hydrophobic compounds are present.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioassays; Growth; Mayfly; Oligochaete; Reproduction; Survival

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29273984     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-0993-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  19 in total

1.  Semivolatile organic pollutants in water, suspended solids, and surface sediments of the Huaihe River, Jiangsu Section, People's Republic of China.

Authors:  H Huang; Y Yu; L Jing; X Wang; J Feng; H Niu; Q Xiao; L Wang
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.151

2.  The relative sensitivity of four benthic invertebrates to metals in spiked-sediment exposures and application to contaminated field sediment.

Authors:  Danielle Milani; Trefor B Reynoldson; Uwe Borgmann; Jurek Kolasa
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.742

3.  Ecotoxicology of dyestuffs-a joint effort by industry.

Authors:  R Anliker
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 6.291

4.  Differential toxicity of Disperse Red 1 and Disperse Red 13 in the Ames test, HepG2 cytotoxicity assay, and Daphnia acute toxicity test.

Authors:  E R A Ferraz; G A Umbuzeiro; G de-Almeida; A Caloto-Oliveira; F M D Chequer; M V B Zanoni; D J Dorta; D P Oliveira
Journal:  Environ Toxicol       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 4.119

5.  The azo dye Disperse Orange 1 induces DNA damage and cytotoxic effects but does not cause ecotoxic effects in Daphnia similis and Vibrio fischeri.

Authors:  Elisa R A Ferraz; Marcella Daruge Grando; Danielle P Oliveira
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 10.588

6.  Comparative bioaccumulation of chlorinated hydrocarbons from sediment by two infaunal invertebrates.

Authors:  J P Meador; N G Adams; E Casillas; J L Bolton
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  Toxicity of sediment-associated substituted phenylamine antioxidants on the early life stages of Pimephales promelas and a characterization of effects on freshwater organisms.

Authors:  Ryan S Prosser; Joanne L Parrott; Melissa Galicia; Kallie Shires; Cheryl Sullivan; John Toito; Adrienne J Bartlett; Danielle Milani; Patty L Gillis; Vimal K Balakrishnan
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 3.742

8.  Sudan azo dyes and Para Red degradation by prevalent bacteria of the human gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  Haiyan Xu; Thomas M Heinze; Donald D Paine; Carl E Cerniglia; Huizhong Chen
Journal:  Anaerobe       Date:  2009-07-04       Impact factor: 3.331

9.  Acute toxicity assessment of textile dyes and textile and dye industrial effluents using Daphnia magna bioassay.

Authors:  Y Verma
Journal:  Toxicol Ind Health       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.273

10.  Toxicity of the azo dyes Acid Red 97 and Bismarck Brown Y to Western clawed frog (Silurana tropicalis).

Authors:  Jeriel J Soriano; Justine Mathieu-Denoncourt; Grant Norman; Shane R de Solla; Valérie S Langlois
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-11-24       Impact factor: 4.223

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Azo dyes degradation by microorganisms - An efficient and sustainable approach.

Authors:  Sadia Zafar; Dilara A Bukhari; Abdul Rehman
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 4.052

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.