| Literature DB >> 29273952 |
Mohammad Hossein Salmani1, Mohammad Abedi2, Sayed Ahmad Mozaffari2, Hossien Ali Sadeghian3.
Abstract
Pomegranate waste modified with Fe2+ and Fe3+ ions followed with carbonization were used as an adsorbent to remove the Pb2+ ions from aqueous solution. To optimum the highest adsorption efficiency, adsorption experiments were conducted on iron modified carbons by batch technique. The characteristic of composite was studied by scanning electron microscope (SEM) and Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (FT-IR). The best pH for control of chemical adsorption was selected within pH of 6.0-6.5. It was observed that the contact time of 90 min, initial concentration 50.0 ppm, and adsorbent dose, 1.0 g/100 ml solution was found to be optimum conditions. On this condition, the maximum adsorption capacity was obtained 27.5 and 22.5 mg/g for Fe2+ and Fe3+ impregnated pomegranate peel carbons (PPC), respectively. The value of Cid, 1.584 for Fe2+-PPC and 0.552 for Fe3+-PPC, indicates that the effect of the boundary layer is more important in adsorption of Pb2+ by Fe2+-PPC and the pore diffusion is the rate limiting mechanism after 30 min. Thermodynamic parameters of Gibbs free energy, enthalpy, and entropy of Pb2+ adsorption on iron-modified carbons suggest that the adsorption process is favorable and spontaneous under the optimum condition.Entities:
Keywords: Composite; Iron modified carbon; Kinetic; Pomegranate peels; Thermodynamic
Year: 2017 PMID: 29273952 PMCID: PMC5741572 DOI: 10.1186/s13568-017-0520-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AMB Express ISSN: 2191-0855 Impact factor: 3.298
Fig. 1SEM images of adsorbents prepared for adsorption of Pb. SEMs were recorded in the acceleration voltage 15.00 kV and magnitude ×100.00 for focusing on surface porous. a SEM image of pomegranate peel carbon and b iron modified pomegranate peel carbon. There was a significant difference of porous between two image corresponding modifications
Fig. 2FT-IR spectrum of Fe2+ modified pomegranate peel carbon
The results of AA calibration for measurement of Pb2+
| Concentration of Pb2+ (ppm) | No. of replicates | Mean value of signal | S D |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.0 | 20 | 0.0037 | 0.01108 |
| 5.0 | 5 | 0.1718 | 0.00227 |
| 10.0 | 5 | 0.3312 | 0.00368 |
| 25.0 | 5 | 0.8526 | 0.00225 |
| 50.0 | 5 | 1.7070 | 0.00574 |
Linearity, limit of detection and quantification for the AA
| Parameters | Value |
|---|---|
| Linearity range | 1–50 ppm |
| Intercept | 0.0037 ± 0.0111 |
| Slop | 0.0346 ± 0.00043 |
| Correlation coefficient (R2) | 0.9996 |
| Probability (P) | < 0.0001 |
| Detection limit (D.L.) | 1.050 mg/l |
| Quantification limit (Q.L.) | 3.200 mg/l |
Fig. 3The effect of contact time on adsorption capacity. The change of adsorption capacity in removal of Pb2+ vs contact time for Fe2+-PPC is depicted in red and for Fe3+-PPC is depicted in blue
Fig. 4The effect of initial concentration on adsorption capacity. The change of adsorption capacity in removal of Pb2+ vs initial concentration of Pb2+ for Fe2+-PPC is depicted in red and for Fe3+-PPC is depicted in blue
Fig. 5The effect of composite dose on adsorption capacity. The change of adsorption capacity in removal of the Pb2+ vs amount of adsorbents in solution for Fe2+-PPC is depicted in red and for Fe3+-PPC is depicted in blue
Fig. 6Diffusion kinetic models for Pb2+adsorption. The Morris Weber model kinetic were don’t in various times. This model for Fe2+-PPC is depicted in blue. The Morris Weber model in the range of 0–30 min for Fe3+-PPC is depicted in red and in the range of 30–60 min is depicted in green
The intraparticle diffusion kinetic data for adsorption of Pb2+ ions on iron modified pomegranate peel carbons
| Adsorbent | Parameters | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Kid | Cid | R2 | |
| Up to 30 min | |||
| Fe2+ PPC | 0.228 | 1.584 | 0.998 |
| Total of time | |||
| Fe3+ PPC | 0.299 | 0.552 | 0.986 |
Thermodynamic parameters for Pb(II) adsorption on iron modified pomegranate peel carbons (Fe2+-PPC and Fe3+-PPC)
| Temp (°C) | Fe2+-PPC | Fe3+-PPC | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ΔG* | ΔH* | ΔS* | ΔG* | ΔH* | ΔS* | |
| 25 | − 0.17 | 50.0 | ||||
| 55 | − 3.87 | 40. 6 | 0.136 | − 2.51 | 27.5 | 0.092 |
| 85 | − 8.35 | − 5.45 | ||||
* kJ/mol