Literature DB >> 29273649

Epidemiology of cancers in Lahore, Pakistan, among children, adolescents and adults, 2010-2012: a cross-sectional study part 2.

Farhana Badar1, Shahid Mahmood.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the cancer incidence by age group for the Lahore district population within the Punjab Cancer Registry (PCR), Pakistan. The average annual population of Lahore was 9.8 million in 2010-2012. This is a sequel to a study published earlier.
DESIGN: A cross-sectional study.
SETTING: The registry has 19 centres in Lahore reporting their data to the coordinating office located within the Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Center (SKMCH&RC), Lahore, Pakistan. PARTICIPANTS: Data existing in the PCR database, based on a confirmed diagnosis of cancer from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2012, among the Lahore residents, were reviewed. OUTCOME MEASURES: Cancer counts and the age-standardised incidence rates (ASIR) per 100 000 population were computed by gender, cancer site/type and age group (0-14, 15-19 and ≥20 years).
RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2012, of the 15 840 new cancers diagnosed, 57% were in females. The ASIRs in age groups 0-14, 15-19 and ≥20 years, among females, were: 6.1, 8.4 and 170.7, respectively, and among males, 9.3, 12.2 and 104.5, respectively. The common diagnoses in children, adolescents and adults were: (1) among females: leukaemia: 2.2; bone tumour: 1.4 and breast cancer: 79.2, respectively, and (2) among males: leukaemia: 3.6; bone tumour: 2.4 and prostate cancer: 10.7, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The ASIR was higher in adult women than in men, but it was lower in girls and young women than their corresponding male counterparts. Leukaemia was the most common diagnosis in children and bone tumour in adolescents, regardless of gender. Among women, breast cancer and, in men, prostate cancer, were the leading cancer types, in adults. These estimates could be used for the expansion of health coverage in the region including setting-up low cost, diagnostic tests for early detection of cancers. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  age-group; gender; incidence rates; lahore; malignancies; the punjab cancer registry

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29273649      PMCID: PMC5778322          DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016559

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Open        ISSN: 2044-6055            Impact factor:   2.692


This is the first time that the age-standardised incidence rates have been presented for the Lahore district population separately for children, young adults and adults. A comparison has been made with the incidence rates reported by other registries around the world, where available. Due to sparse data available from districts contiguous to Lahore district within Punjab, comparisons with the surrounding districts could not be made.

Introduction

Pakistan is a less-developed country, categorised as a lower middle-income country, by the World Bank, and1 it is also a densely populated country with its population estimated at 195.4 million in 2016.2 Being a heavily populated country with limited resources, certain systems, well established in the more developed countries of the world, are still in the evolving phase in our country. This includes the non-communicable disease surveillance, including cancer registration, which has long been neglected in the region. Setting up and running a registry is a challenging task but is undoubtedly needed in developing countries of the world including Pakistan. In 2005, a population-based registry called the Punjab Cancer Registry (PCR) was set up through the joint efforts of professionals representing different healthcare facilities within the district of Lahore, in the province of Punjab, Pakistan.3 In 2016, we published a paper on the PCR with details related to the cancers registered, over a 3-year period from 2010 to 2012, within the Lahore district, a populous district of the 36 districts of the province of Punjab, Pakistan.4 The aforementioned paper was the first paper to report the cancer incidence within the population of the district of Lahore. The current paper is a sequel to the paper published earlier, giving the cancer statistics for the district of Lahore by age category. The goal of the study is to provide the age-adjusted incidence rates for children, young adults/adolescents and adults.

Methods

The PCR has 19 centres in Lahore that report their data to the collaborating office located within a charitable organisation, the Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Center, Lahore, Pakistan. For the purpose of data collection, active and passive methods were used. Active method involved a review by the registry staff of the outpatient and inpatient medical records of the patients and abstraction of data onto special forms. Records included pathology reports and clinical notes from outpatient clinics and indoor patient departments representing medical and radiation oncology, radiology and surgery. However, passive notifications were carried out by healthcare workers/front desk staff other than the registry staff and reported to the registry staff. Evaluating the data initially retrieved from the PCR database to conduct a retrospective review of the records for our first population-based study on newly diagnosed malignancies in Lahore between 2010 and 2012, we conducted another study to compute the incidence rates for three age categories: 0–14 (children), 15–19 (adolescents) and ≥20 years (adults), according to gender and cancer site/type. All cancers were categorised using the International Classification of Diseases, Clinical Modification, 10th revision.5 Further groups were created using the International Classification of Childhood Cancer definitions, based on site and morphology coded according to the third edition of the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology.6 7 This was done to enable comparisons with results provided by other registries of the world. A check for multiple primaries was done, according to the rules set by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC).8 The population denominators were based on the population structure of Lahore, as provided in table 1, and computed using the average annual growth rate of 3.46% made available by the Government of Pakistan.9 The average annual population of Lahore was estimated at 9.8 million during these 3 years of study. Counts and age-standardised incidence rates (ASIR) were calculated for each of the three age categories under review and subsequently for 5-year age groups within the adult category. The ASIRs were computed using the World Standard of Segi as the standard population, by applying the direct method of age standardisation and all the rates presented as per 100 000 population.10 Patients were followed up between July and October 2015, by making telephone calls to them on the numbers provided on their data collection forms. The purpose of calling them was to find their status—alive/dead. However, contact could be established with 60% of the cases only.4 As for the rest, they either did not answer or their SIMS were blocked and if anyone did answer, they said they did not know the concerned person/patient. Data were analysed using Microsoft Excel V.2010 and SPSS V.19. The Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital & Research Center granted exemption from full IRB evaluation of this study. In this manuscript, the term ‘Lahore’ refers to the Lahore district and the ‘Registry’ refers to the PCR.
Table 1

Population estimates for the district of Lahore by gender and age group, 2010–2012

Year →201020112012Total
Age group (years)FemaleMaleFemaleMaleFemaleMaleFemaleMale
0–4585 856608 924606 126629 992627 098651 7901 819 0801 890 706
5–9621 343661 178642 841684 055665 083707 7231 929 2672 052 956
10–14603 207648 088624 077670 512645 671693 7121 872 9552 012 312
15–19522 833554 620540 923573 810559 639593 6641 623 3961 722 095
20–24446 315495 261461 757512 397477 734530 1251 385 8071 537 783
25–29352 415401 889364 609415 794377 225430 1811 094 2491 247 864
30–34299 024347 491309 370359 514320 074371 954928 4681 078 959
35–39242 033285 887250 407295 779259 071306 013751 511887 679
40–44208 009250 761215 206259 437222 652268 414645 868778 612
45–49161 556186 385167 146192 834172 929199 506501 630578 725
50–54144 596174 903149 599180 955154 775187 216448 970543 073
55–5991 861115 69895 040119 70198 328123 843285 229359 242
60–6482 959102 34985 829105 89188 799109 554257 587317 794
65–6950 38762 31252 13064 46853 93466 699156 450193 480
70–7440 73354 30542 14356 18443 60158 128126 477168 616
75+44 42656 26745 96358 21447 55360 229137 942174 710
All ages4 497 5525 006 3194 653 1675 179 5384 814 1675 358 75013 964 88515 544 606
Population estimates for the district of Lahore by gender and age group, 2010–2012

Results

Of a total of 15 825 patients newly diagnosed with malignancies in Lahore in 3 years’ time from 2010 to 2012, 57.3% were female and 42.7% were male. The age distribution of the entire cohort of 15 825 patients was as follows: mean 48.6±18.2 years, range 0–106 years and mode 60 years (881 patients (5.6%)). The 25th percentile was 38 years, 50th percentile was 50 years and the 75th percentile was 61 years. Almost 93.5% were microscopically confirmed as opposed to 6.5% being non-microscopically confirmed. The total number of malignancies recorded was 15 840, with 15 patients having double primaries.4 This accounted for the difference in the numbers of patients and malignancies documented.4 Of the 15 840 cases, 9069 (57.3%) were diagnosed in female and 6771 (42.7%) in male patients. The female-to-male ratio among children was 0.46:1, in adolescents 0.48:1 and in adults 1.07:1. Among females, the three highest ASIRs according to age group and subcategory of tumours were: in children: lymphoid leukaemia (1.6) and bone, eye and brain and other central nervous system (CNS) tumours (0.5 each); in adolescents: bone tumours (1.4), brain and other CNS tumours (0.9) and ovary (0.8); and in adults: cancers of the breast (79.2), ovary (7.9) and corpus uteri (6.1). Among males, the highest ASIRs were: in children: lymphoid leukaemia (2.7), Hodgkin lymphoma (1.1) and brain and other CNS tumours (0.8); in young adults: bone (2.4), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL (1.3)) and brain and other CNS tumours (1.2); and in adults: cancers of the prostate (10.7), bladder (8.4) and trachea, bronchus and lung (7.7). The proportional distribution of paediatric embryonal tumours was: retinoblastoma 5.5%, neuroblastoma 2.7%, rhabdomyosarcoma 2.1% (0–14 years) and 5.2% (15–19 years) and nephroblastoma 2.7%. The ASIR for the entire 0–19 year group was also computed, and it was 6.6 for female and 9.9 for male patients. Figures 1–3 and tables 2 and 3 display the ASIRs by gender, age group and cancer type. Within tables 2 and 3, incidence rates based on fewer than 10 cases are shown in italics following IARC Cancer Incidence in Five Continents (CI5) practice to indicate unstable incidence rates. Tables 4 and 5 display the 5-year age-specific incidence rates in adults by cancer type, for females and males, respectively. Table 6 shows a comparison of our results with the incidence rates stated in different studies conducted in Pakistan and New Delhi according to three broad age categories, table 7 shows a comparison of our results with those reported in America and Bangladesh in children and young adults, while online supplementary appendix A shows a comparison of our results in four groups within the age band of 50–69 years with those reported by two registries in India and in the UK.
Table 6

ASIRs per 100 000 population, as reported in other studies conducted in Pakistan and in New Delhi, India

PakistanIndia
PCR 2010–2012: Lahore districtBadar et al 2015: SKMCH&RC, LahoreBadar et al 2008: SKMCH&RC, LahoreKCR 1998–2002: Karachi South district1978–2002: New Delhi
Age groupCancer type/siteFMFMFMFMFM
0–14 yearsLymphoid leukaemia1.62.71.520.50.71.43.01.53.8
Brain, nervous system0.50.8110.30.71.31.51.11.5
Bone0.50.60.40.40.30.40.70.60.60.8
Eye0.50.50.40.60.20.30.30.40.40.8
Leukaemia, unspecified0.40.60.30.50.10.30.20.10.40.6
Connective and soft tissue0.30.40.20.30.20.40.30.40.50.7
Non-Hodgkin lymphoma0.30.90.40.70.30.90.81.20.41.3
Hodgkin lymphoma0.31.10.20.90.20.40.51.40.11.3
Kidney0.30.30.10.50.30.30.30.50.60.9
Myeloid leukaemia0.20.300.10.100.20.90.40.7
15–19 yearsBone1.42.4123.32.4
Brain, nervous system0.91.21.71.91.62.2
Ovary0.80.21.9
Connective and soft tissue0.60.911.30.51.8
Colon, rectum and anus0.50.91.21.2
Non-Hodgkin lymphoma0.51.30.71.32.14.2
Hodgkin lymphoma0.411.21.30.50.8
Lymphoid leukaemia0.30.90.30.20.72
Leukaemia, unspecified0.30.20.30.30.90.8
Myeloid leukaemia0.20.40.202.62.2
Testis0.70.61
Skin0.10.3000.4
≥20 yearsBreast79.21.3114.91.6
Ovary7.914.1
Lip and oral cavity6.37.633.737.2
Corpus uteri6.111.1
Colon, rectum and anus67.57.810.6
Non-Hodgkin lymphoma5.36.87.711.4
Cervix uteri4.812.5
Other skin4.44.86.97.1
Liver46.16.18.9
Thyroid3.51.24.71.1
Prostate10.716.8
Bladder2.48.44.415.4
Trachea, bronchus and lung2.07.75.941.9
Brain, nervous system3.35.83.54.3
Larynx0.63.43.017.9

ASIRs, age-standardised incidence rates; F, female; KCR, Karachi Cancer Registry; M, male; PCR, Punjab Cancer Registry.

Table 7

Comparison of the Lahore district ASIRs per 100 000 population with those reported for Bangladesh and the USA, as compiled by the American Cancer Society (ACS), in children and adolescents

Source/region→ Year→ Cancer type/site↓Lahore 2010–2012* ASIR0–14 years15–19 years
Bangladesh 2011–2014 ASIRACS 2007–2011 ASIRACS 2008–2012 ASIRLahore 2010–2012* ASIRBangladesh 2011–2014 ASIRACS 2008–2012 ASIR
All ICCC groups15.40.717.516.220.60.222.4
Leukaemia5.80.15.35.32.1<0.13.3
Brain, nervous system1.3<0.14.63.52.1<0.12.2
Hodgkin lymphoma1.40.60.61.43.2
Rhabdomyosarcoma0.40.50.50.50.4
Bone tumour§1.1<0.10.70.63.8<0.11.2
Non-Hodgkin lymphoma1.21.00.91.81.7
Neuroblastoma0.3<0.11.11.1<0.1
Gonadal GCT0.3<0.10.31.3<0.1
Nephroblastoma0.6<0.10.80.8<0.1<0.1
Retinoblastoma1.00.20.4<0.1<0.1

*Does not include benign brain tumours.

†Includes benign brain tumours.

‡Excludes benign and borderline brain tumours.

§Bone tumour includes Ewing sarcoma and osteosarcoma.

ASIRs, age-standardised incidence rates; GCT, germ cell tumour; ICCC, International Classification of Childhood Cancer.

Age-standardised incidence rates (ASIR) by age group and gender, in the Lahore district, Pakistan, 2010–2012. Age-standardised incidence rates (ASIR) in children and adolescents, in the Lahore district, Pakistan, 2010–2012. GCT, germ cell tumour. Age-standardised incidence rates (ASIR) by gender among adults, in the Lahore district, Pakistan, 2010–2012. Age-standardised incidence rates (ASIR) among females, by age group, in the Lahore district, Pakistan, 2010–2012 Incidence rates based on fewer than 10 cases are shown in italics following IARC Cancer Incidence in Five Continents (CI5) practice to indicate unstable incidence rates. CNS, central nervous system. Age-standardised incidence rates (ASIR) among males, by age group, in the Lahore district, Pakistan, 2010–2012 Incidence rates based on fewer than 10 cases are shown in italics following IARC Cancer Incidence in Five Continents (CI5) practice to indicate unstable incidence rates. CNS, central nervous system. Counts and age-specific incidence rates (ASIR) among adult females, by age group, in the Lahore district, Pakistan, 2010–2012 CNS, central nervous system. Counts and age-specific incidence rates (ASIR) among adult males by age group, in the Lahore district, Pakistan, 2010–2012 CNS, central nervous system. ASIRs per 100 000 population, as reported in other studies conducted in Pakistan and in New Delhi, India ASIRs, age-standardised incidence rates; F, female; KCR, Karachi Cancer Registry; M, male; PCR, Punjab Cancer Registry. Comparison of the Lahore district ASIRs per 100 000 population with those reported for Bangladesh and the USA, as compiled by the American Cancer Society (ACS), in children and adolescents *Does not include benign brain tumours. †Includes benign brain tumours. ‡Excludes benign and borderline brain tumours. §Bone tumour includes Ewing sarcoma and osteosarcoma. ASIRs, age-standardised incidence rates; GCT, germ cell tumour; ICCC, International Classification of Childhood Cancer. Nearly 27.5% of the 15 825 patients were alive by the cut-off date for this study, approximately 32.4% had died and the vital status of about 40.1% could not be determined. Of the 5134 deaths recorded, 5.7% were reported in children, 2.3% in young adults and 92.1% in adults.

Discussion

In our study, the ASIR was higher in adult women than in men, but it was lower in girls and young women than their corresponding male counterparts. Leukaemia was the most common diagnosis in children and bone tumour in young adults, regardless of gender. Among women, breast cancer and, in men, prostate cancer, were the leading cancer types, in adults. Furthermore, more than 90% of the cancers were recorded in adults again reinforcing the fact that cancer is primarily a disease of the older people; over 50% of the cases were diagnosed in patients 50 years of age and above. This scenario is different from what has been observed in the UK, where more than half of all cancer cases each year were diagnosed in people aged 70 years and over, in 2011–2013.11 Moreover, in our study, cancers in children accounted for about 5.6% of the cases, but in the UK, these accounted for less than 1% of all new cancer cases each year, 2011–2013.11 Both in the UK and our study, leukaemia was the most commonly diagnosed cancer in children, while leukaemia, lymphoma, brain and other CNS tumours together accounted for more than two-thirds of all cancers diagnosed in children.11 In the UK, cancer in teenagers and young adults accounted for less than 1% of all new cancer cases, but in our study, cancer in children and adolescents accounted for 7.8% of all diagnoses, higher than what has been reported in the UK.11 This may be attributed to a difference in the characteristics of the UK population from that of the Lahore population. The UK has an ageing population and a comparison of the population distributions for the UK to the Lahore district population has been made: for ages 0–15 years: 19% versus 40%; for ages 16–64 years: 64% versus 57% and for ages 65 years and more: 18% versus 3%, respectively.12 A study recently published from Bangladesh has shown that, during 2011–2014, among children, leukaemias, retinoblastoma and malignant bone tumours were the most commonly diagnosed cancers, whereas in adolescents, malignant bone tumours, germ cell and gonadal tumours and epithelial tumours were the three most common cancer types.13 However, the ASIRs reported in the aforesaid study from Bangladesh are low as compared with our study; these are, per 100 000 population, 0.78 versus 15.4, respectively, for the age group of 0–14 years and 0.21 versus 20.6, respectively, for the age group of 15–19 years for all sites combined. Another study reporting the findings from different regions of India has shown that, in New Delhi, the ASIR for females was 7.6 and for males 14.6, per 100 000 population, in the age group of 0–14 years during 1978–2002.14 These figures are somewhat different from what has been reported in our study, which is 6.1 for girls and 9.3 for boys. The ASIRs per 100 000 for New Delhi and Lahore for leukaemia among girls were 2.26 and 2.2, respectively, and among boys 5.11 and 3.6, respectively; these are more similar than different from one another. In New Delhi, following leukaemia, high ASIRs were recorded for brain and other CNS tumours (1.09) and kidney tumours (0.64) among girls, whereas, among boys, for lymphomas (2.5) and brain and other CNS tumours (1.5). The reports from Bangladesh and New Delhi provide the incidence rates per million population. However, in order to make comparisons with our study, these have been presented as per 100 000 population. Further comparison of the incidence rates obtained in our study has been made with those provided by two other studies conducted in Lahore and with one conducted in the Karachi South district, which was part of the Karachi Cancer Registry (KCR). The studies conducted in Lahore, two in number, were based on cancer incidence in children and adolescents registered at the SKMCH&RC, Lahore.15 16 The last report on Karachi South published in the CI5, Volume IX, was based on the 1998–2002 data provided by Dr Yasmin Bhurgri (late) to the agency.17 The average annual population of Karachi South was less than half a million. The age-specific rates and the population structure reported in CI5, Volume IX, for Karachi South have been used by the PCR Staff to compute the ASIRs for the Karachi South district according to three age groups under consideration and the top ranking cancers as reported in Lahore to enable a comparison between these two regions of Pakistan. Table 6 shows the details related to the cancers with highest ranking ASIRs seen in Lahore along with corresponding ASIRs obtained from four other studies, including India, where available. The comparison shows that the ASIRs in children were more similar than different from one another except for brain and other CNS tumours and Hodgkin lymphoma, which were relatively high in Karachi South. The incidence of paediatric brain tumours appeared to be comparatively low in Lahore; perhaps not everyone could afford an MRI/CT and some of these kids died before a diagnosis was made or the cases were under-reported. Among adolescents, again, the incidence rates were comparable with aforementioned studies, except for ovarian cancer and NHL having higher ASIRs in Karachi South than in Lahore. A recent report on childhood cancers released by the IARC has shown almost the same results for the 2008–2012 time period for Lahore district as part of the PCR, as for the 3-year time period on which our study is based.18 In table 7, further comparison with the incidence rates reported by the American Cancer Society (ACS) in two different studies shows the rates to be more similar than different from one another except for brain and other CNS tumours, which were noticeably low in our study; for Hodgkin lymphoma, the rate was high in our study in children but low in young adults, and for bone tumour, the rate was substantially high in our study compared with that reported in the ACS studies.19 20 Table 7 shows the details related to the Bangladesh study, the ACS studies (two in number) and our own study. Among adult patients, as shown in table 6, all the ASIRs reported for Karachi South were higher than for Lahore, except for brain and other CNS tumours. In adults, breast cancer in females and prostate cancer in males had the highest ASIRs in Lahore. In Karachi South, the ASIR for breast cancer was higher (114.9) than that recorded in Lahore (79.2). In Lahore, the ASIR for prostate cancer was 10.7 and for bladder cancer it was 8.4, among men, compared with 16.8 and 15.4, respectively, in Karachi South. Furthermore, in Karachi South, the highest ASIRs, after breast cancer in women, were recorded for tobacco-related cancers, that is, those of the trachea, bronchus and lung (41.9) and lip and oral cavity (37.2), in men. The ASIR for cancers of the lip and oral cavity were also high (33.7) among women in Karachi South. The point to be noted is that in our previous publication on cancers in the Lahore district, the ASIR for breast cancer in females, for all age groups combined,4 was reported to be 47.6, while in the current study, stratification by age group has shown the ASIR to be 79.2 among adult women. The relatively high ASIR for breast cancer is intriguing as no definite risk factors have been identified so far. An epidemiological, retrospective study on breast cancer at a cancer treatment facility in Lahore has shown that most women were parous, had breast fed their babies, had not used any oral contraceptives or hormone replacement therapy and there was no noteworthy difference in the premenopausal and postmenopausal status. A family history of cancer was present in less than one-fifths of the patients.21 Furthermore, these females had a relatively low mean presenting age (48 years), age at menarche was 13.2 years, age at first childbirth was 23.7 years and the body mass index (BMI) was on the higher side.21 The vast majority of cancers appeared to be sporadic in nature, while a lower age at menarche and a higher BMI appeared to be striking.21 Although the findings of various studies including case–control studies have not been consistent with one another, it has been demonstrated that factors as young age at menarche, single marital status, nulliparity, late first full-term pregnancy, use of oral contraceptives, late menopause, high BMI and a family history of breast cancer could be associated with an increased risk, whereas young age at first live birth, increasing parity and vitamin D supplementation could be associated with a decreased risk of this disease in our population. Large-scale, population-based studies are needed to validate demographic, clinical and lifestyle risk factors related to pathways of this disease including the abovementioned factors.22–26 Our literature review did not find any separate results for the broad ≥20-year category by the ACS or the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. However, stratification of the data for Lahore for adults by 5-year age group (tables 4 and 5) and further comparisons of the age-specific incidence rates of the commonly diagnosed cancers with what has been reported by IARC in CI5 Volume X and the SEER Program have revealed that, in general, the incidence rates for Lahore were somewhat different from those of New Delhi and Mumbai but markedly different from what has been reported by the SEER Program and the UK (England), with the latter two showing very high incidence rates for almost all cancer types.27 28 As for New Delhi and Mumbai, it has been shown that in males, the Lahore district incidence rates for prostate cancer were relatively high in the age groups of 50–54, 55–59, 60–64, 65–69 years compared with those for Mumbai but lower than those for New Delhi and markedly low compared with the UK incidence rates.28 Online supplementary appendix A shows a comparison of three different types of cancers by region and four aforementioned age groups. Furthermore, the incidence rates for cancers of the trachea, bronchus and lung for Lahore were quite low compared with the aforementioned regions especially the UK, and similar differences were observed for cancers of the oral cavity, colorectum and NHL, in adults in all of the 5-year age categories. Among females, in all age groups in adults, the incidence rates for cancer of the breast were higher than those reported for the Indian registries under discussion except those 75+ years of age but markedly low compared with the UK rates except the age category of 20–34 years, in which the incidence rates were higher than the UK rates. Online supplementary appendix A shows a comparison of some of the age groups for breast cancer by region. Moreover, the incidence rates for cancers of the corpus uteri were high as compared with Mumbai except in those 75+ years but lower than New Delhi’s. Incidence rates for cancers of the ovary, oral cavity and colorectum were low, and for cancer of the cervix uteri, incidence rates were significantly lower than those for the Indian registries studied. The time periods available or used for making comparisons were 2003–2007 for New Delhi, Mumbai and the UK and 2010–2014 for the SEER Program.27 28 Finally, a comparison with the age-specific rates for the Karachi South district of Pakistan showed that for the time period 1998–2002, in both male and female patients, the KCR rates were significantly high for the commonly diagnosed cancers including prostate, breast, colorectum, lip and oral cavity, cervix uteri and corpus uteri versus those reported for Lahore.17 The differences, although intriguing, have not been fully explored to enable us to comment on them. Extensive population-based studies on risk factors could highlight some of the reasons associated with the differences observed. Although comparisons have been made with the incidence rates reported in other regions of the world, the use of different standard populations, as the Segi World Standard Population in our study and the US 2000 Standard Population by the ACS, indicates a limitation of our report. Furthermore, the availability of results from the abovementioned studies for different time periods is also suggestive of a limitation of our review.

Generalisability of the results

In Pakistan, the last census was held in 1998, and there is an ongoing one this year. In March 1998, the total population of the district of Lahore was recorded to be 6 318 745 with an intercensal increase of 78.3% since March 1981 when it was 3 544 942.9 The average annual growth rate of Lahore was nearly 3.5% during this period. In the 1998 census report, the total area of Lahore was documented as 1772 square kilometres, which gives a population density of 3566 persons per square kilometre as against 2000 persons observed in 1981, thus indicating a high growth rate of the population.29 A comparison of the population density per square kilometre of the Lahore district with other populous districts of Punjab, as reported in 1998, has been made: Gujranwala: 939, Faisalabad: 927, Sialkot: 903 and Multan: 838 persons.29 It is, however, noticeable that the land area of these districts is vast as compared with the Lahore district.29 The urban population of the Lahore district accounted for 82.4% of the total population of the district in 1998, which grew at an average rate of 3.3% during 1981–1998, but the urban population of the province of Punjab was 31.3%.29 Urban population in other provinces of Pakistan was reported as: Sindh: 48.8%, Balochistan: 23.9% and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa: 16.9%, according to the 1998 population census.29 The differences are stark reflecting that Lahore has had a very high population density for decades, and the ratio of urban to rural population has also remained extremely high for as long. These dissimilarities are meaningful and one can question whether the cancer distributions reported for Lahore can be extrapolated to the inhabitants of other districts of Punjab or to other provinces of the country. Once the latest census findings are released completely and studies on cancer registration conducted in other districts of the region, will we be able to see the actual scenario related to the incidence rates and will hopefully clarify this matter further.

Conclusions

In a resource-constrained country like Pakistan, having continued, sustainable reporting and registration of any disease is a challenge. There are, however, significant gains if an accurate and sustainable registry is available for diseases with a significant burden on society. Overall, childhood malignancies are often curable if diagnosed and treated in a timely and appropriate manner, and an accurate estimate of their incidence can help health planners in accurate allocation of resources to treat these. The PCR and the reports on cancer estimates for Lahore will perhaps bring this neglected disease to the attention of policy makers and guide them about the allocation of healthcare resources to where they are most needed incorporating specialist training, infrastructure availability, development of prevention programmes, establishment of low cost, early detection/diagnosis methods/techniques and research into putative risk factors implicated in the aetiology of the disease. These reports could also motivate and facilitate other professionals to set up registries in their respective regions and promote cancer registration in the country, thereby enabling comparisons of incidence rates with adjacent districts.
Table 2

Age-standardised incidence rates (ASIR) among females, by age group, in the Lahore district, Pakistan, 2010–2012

Site (females)Count 0–14 yearsASIR 0–14 yearsCount 15–19 yearsASIR 15–19 yearsCount ≥ 20 yearsASIR ≥ 20 years
Lip00.000.0 9 0.2
Tongue00.000.01292.8
Mouth00.0 3 0.21272.6
Salivary glands 1 0.000.0400.7
Tonsil00.000.0 8 0.2
Nasopharynx 1 0.0 2 0.1160.3
Hypopharynx00.0 1 0.1310.6
Pharynx 1 0.000.0 4 0.1
Oesophagus00.0 1 0.1942.0
Stomach00.000.01052.1
Small intestine00.000.0170.4
Colon 1 0.0 5 0.31533.1
Rectum 1 0.0 4 0.21322.5
Anus00.000.0230.4
Liver 3 0.1 1 0.11734.0
Gall bladder and so on00.0 1 0.11383.2
Pancreas00.0 1 0.1390.9
Other ill-defined digestive 1 0.0 1 0.1120.2
Nose, sinuses 1 0.0 2 0.1240.5
Larynx00.000.0280.6
Trachea, bronchus and lung 2 0.0 3 0.2872.0
Other thoracic organs00.0 1 0.1150.3
Bone290.5221.4400.5
Melanoma of the skin00.000.0130.2
Other skin 1 0.0 2 0.11934.4
Connective and soft tissue190.3 9 0.6801.4
Breast 3 0.0 2 0.1407779.2
Vulva 1 0.000.0180.4
Vagina00.000.0160.3
Cervix uteri00.000.02474.8
Corpus uteri00.000.02676.1
Uterus, unspecified00.000.0891.9
Ovary120.2130.84177.9
Other female genital organs00.000.0180.4
Placenta00.000.0 7 0.1
Kidney150.300.0871.7
Renal pelvis00.000.0 1 0.0
Ureter00.000.0 1 0.0
Bladder 1 0.0 1 0.11072.4
Eye230.500.0170.4
Brain, nervous system320.5140.91813.3
Thyroid 2 0.0 3 0.22103.5
Adrenal 2 0.000.0 2 0.0
Hodgkin lymphoma160.3 7 0.4570.9
Non-Hodgkinlymphoma180.3 8 0.52515.3
Multiple myeloma00.000.0360.8
Lymphoid leukaemia891.6 5 0.3180.3
Myeloid leukaemia130.2 4 0.2450.7
Other leukaemias 1 0.000.0 1 0.0
Leukaemia, unspecified210.4 5 0.3140.2
Other and unspecified170.3 3 0.251610.8
Benign CNS120.2120.71642.8
All sites (n (%))339 (3.7%)6.1136 (1.5%)8.48594 (94.7%)170.7

Incidence rates based on fewer than 10 cases are shown in italics following IARC Cancer Incidence in Five Continents (CI5) practice to indicate unstable incidence rates.

CNS, central nervous system.

Table 3

Age-standardised incidence rates (ASIR) among males, by age group, in the Lahore district, Pakistan, 2010–2012

Site (males)Count 0–14 yearsASIR 0–14 yearsCount 15–19 yearsASIR 15–19 yearsCount ≥20 yearsASIR ≥20 years
Lip00.000.0130.2
Tongue00.000.01803.0
Mouth 2 0.000.02103.6
Salivary glands 2 0.0 1 0.1470.8
Tonsil00.000.0 8 0.1
Other oropharynx00.000.0 6 0.1
Nasopharynx00.0 2 0.1170.3
Hypopharynx00.000.0210.4
Pharynx00.000.0 5 0.1
Oesophagus00.0 1 0.11262.3
Stomach 1 0.000.01612.7
Small intestine00.000.0260.4
Colon 1 0.0 7 0.42223.9
Rectum00.0 7 0.41793.0
Anus00.0 2 0.1390.6
Liver 1 0.0 1 0.13266.1
Gall bladder and so on00.0 1 0.1921.7
Pancreas00.000.0571.1
Other ill-defined digestive00.000.0160.3
Nose, sinuses 1 0.0 2 0.1290.5
Larynx00.000.01833.4
Trachea, bronchus and lung00.000.03967.7
Other thoracic organs 2 0.0 1 0.1230.4
Bone380.6422.4630.9
Melanoma of the skin 1 0.0 1 0.1110.2
Other skin 8 0.1 4 0.22594.6
Connective and soft tissue210.4150.91081.6
Breast00.0 1 0.1691.3
Penis00.000.0 1 0.0
Prostate00.000.052610.7
Testis 4 0.1 9 0.5770.9
Other male genital organs 1 0.000.0 4 0.1
Kidney170.3 2 0.11532.7
Renal pelvis00.000.0 1 0.0
Ureter00.000.0 1 0.0
Bladder 1 0.000.04408.4
Other urinary organs00.000.0 2 0.0
Eye270.5 2 0.1280.5
Brain, nervous system480.8201.23905.8
Thyroid 1 0.0 3 0.2771.2
Adrenal 1 0.0 1 0.1 5 0.1
Hodgkin lymphoma661.1171.01191.7
Non-Hodgkin lymphoma580.9231.34126.8
Multiple myeloma 1 0.000.0520.9
Lymphoid leukaemia1562.7120.7390.6
Myeloid leukaemia210.3 7 0.4791.1
Other leukaemias00.000.0 6 0.1
Leukaemia, unspecified340.6 3 0.2230.3
Other and unspecified210.3150.95259.2
Benign CNS190.3 8 0.51552.1
All sites (n (%))554 (8.1%)9.3210 (3.1%)12.26007 (88.7%)104.5

Incidence rates based on fewer than 10 cases are shown in italics following IARC Cancer Incidence in Five Continents (CI5) practice to indicate unstable incidence rates.

CNS, central nervous system.

Table 4

Counts and age-specific incidence rates (ASIR) among adult females, by age group, in the Lahore district, Pakistan, 2010–2012

Site – femalesCount 20-ASIR 20-Count 25-ASIR 25-Count 30-ASIR 30-Count 35-ASIR 35-Count 40-ASIR 40-Count 45-ASIR 45-Count 50-ASIR 50-Count 55-ASIR 55-Count 60-ASIR 60-Count 65-ASIR 65-Count 70-ASIR 70-Count 75+ASIR 75+
Lip00.000.000.000.000.010.200.031.110.410.621.610.7
Tongue20.110.120.291.291.4275.4214.7144.9176.695.8118.775.1
Mouth30.230.320.2111.5192.981.6276.0134.693.5117.01411.175.1
Salivary glands20.160.520.260.830.530.651.120.772.731.910.800.0
Tonsil00.000.000.010.100.010.230.710.400.000.010.810.7
Nasopharynx10.120.230.300.020.330.610.210.410.400.021.600.0
Hypopharynx30.210.120.240.520.330.630.741.451.910.621.610.7
Pharynx00.010.100.000.000.000.000.010.400.000.010.810.7
Oesophagus00.030.330.370.9121.9204.081.882.8155.874.564.753.6
Stomach40.310.191.0101.3142.2193.8112.5113.972.7148.900.053.6
Small intestine10.100.000.000.040.600.000.010.451.921.332.410.7
Colon20.180.7121.3152.0132.0173.4153.3207.0135.0159.6129.5118.0
Rectum130.9100.9131.491.2111.7153.0143.1124.2135.074.586.375.1
Anus20.100.030.310.160.930.610.200.020.810.632.410.7
Liver20.110.120.220.391.4224.4286.23211.23112.02616.6118.775.1
Gall bladder and so on00.000.050.530.4101.5132.6224.9196.7238.92214.197.1128.7
Pancreas00.020.210.140.520.340.840.962.120.895.832.421.4
Other ill-defined digestive20.110.110.100.000.000.040.900.031.200.010.800.0
Nose, sinuses00.000.010.120.300.030.630.751.862.321.310.810.7
Larynx00.000.020.210.140.640.861.341.431.210.600.032.2
Trachea, bronchus and lung10.110.150.530.460.971.481.8134.6145.4138.386.385.8
Other thoracic organs00.000.000.020.310.240.800.010.441.610.610.810.7
Bone130.930.340.4101.320.330.620.410.400.000.021.600.0
Melanoma of the skin00.010.110.120.310.220.420.420.700.000.010.810.7
Other skin10.130.320.2101.3192.9112.2235.1186.32911.32616.62419.02719.6
Connective and soft tissue90.690.870.891.2111.761.281.841.441.663.832.442.9
Breast463.315314.029932.242055.955786.2636126.8585130.3452158.5397154.1247157.9158124.912792.1
Vulva00.000.010.130.410.210.200.041.420.810.610.842.9
Vagina00.020.200.010.120.340.810.220.710.400.010.821.4
Cervix uteri30.240.4121.3293.9375.7479.4327.13010.52610.1138.375.575.1
Corpus uteri00.020.260.6111.5121.9306.0449.84716.55722.12516.02318.2107.2
Uterus unspecified00.010.110.170.9101.5173.4184.082.8155.863.864.700.0
Ovary221.6211.9283.0374.9517.96112.26013.44415.45019.41912.11411.1107.2
Other female genital organs00.010.100.020.330.510.210.220.762.310.610.800.0
Placenta20.110.130.310.100.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.0
Kidney30.200.020.2121.6132.081.6122.7144.983.153.243.264.3
Renal pelvis00.000.000.000.000.000.010.200.000.000.000.000.0
Ureter00.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.010.800.0
Bladder00.010.120.281.181.281.6122.7144.9135.0148.91310.31410.1
Eye00.000.000.000.020.320.400.000.020.874.510.832.2
Brain, nervous system130.9222.0131.4192.5213.3224.4224.9155.3135.0127.754.042.9
Thyroid261.9171.6262.8222.9213.3234.6296.5103.5176.653.2107.942.9
Adrenal10.100.000.000.010.200.000.000.000.000.000.000.0
Hodgkin lymphoma130.9111.040.481.120.351.010.251.841.610.632.400.0
Non-Hodgkin lymphoma70.590.880.9152.0233.6295.8337.43512.32810.92214.11713.42518.1
Multiple myeloma00.000.000.010.120.381.651.120.772.753.254.010.7
Lymphoid leukaemia20.120.220.200.030.510.210.220.731.210.610.800.0
Myeloid leukaemia70.570.660.650.730.530.651.141.420.810.621.600.0
Other leukaemias00.000.000.000.010.200.000.000.000.000.000.000.0
Leukaemia unspecified20.130.310.110.110.210.230.700.000.010.610.800.0
Other and unspecified151.1201.8252.7354.7457.06312.66714.97124.96224.15333.93426.92618.8
Benign, CNS40.3171.6202.2293.9264.0244.8163.662.1114.374.532.410.7
All sites (n (%))227 (2.6)16.4351 (4.1)32.1541 (6.3)58.3787 (9.1)104.71005 (11.7)155.61193 (13.9)237.81167 (13.6)259.9963 (11.2)337.6938 (10.9)364.1623 (7.2)398.2441 (5.1)348.7358 (4.1)259.5

CNS, central nervous system.

Table 5

Counts and age-specific incidence rates (ASIR) among adult males by age group, in the Lahore district, Pakistan, 2010–2012

Site – malesCount 20-ASIR 20-Count 25-ASIR 25-Count 30-ASIR 30-Count 35-ASIR 35-Count 40-ASIR 40-Count 45-ASIR 45-Count 50-ASIR 50-Count 55-ASIR 55-Count 60-ASIR 60-Count 65-ASIR 65-Count 70-ASIR 70-Count 75+ASIR 75+
Lip10.100.010.120.200.000.010.220.641.310.510.600.0
Tongue40.370.660.6182.0273.5213.6244.4185.0237.2126.2169.542.3
Mouth10.120.2131.2101.1233.0315.4264.8359.73210.1178.8137.774.0
Salivary glands20.120.230.360.750.640.740.741.161.931.653.031.7
Tonsil00.010.100.010.110.100.010.210.320.610.500.000.0
Other oropharynx00.000.000.000.000.020.300.020.610.300.010.600.0
Nasopharynx10.100.020.210.120.320.310.230.841.310.500.000.0
Hypopharynx00.010.110.110.120.300.030.610.330.921.021.252.9
Pharynx00.000.000.010.110.120.310.200.000.000.000.000.0
Oesophagus10.130.230.370.840.5183.1173.1164.5175.3126.2169.5126.9
Stomach10.1100.8100.9121.4172.2223.8183.3174.7144.42010.3148.363.4
Small intestine20.100.000.030.310.130.530.630.830.910.531.842.3
Colon120.880.680.7131.5162.1284.8244.4215.83711.62814.5169.5116.3
Rectum110.7110.9151.491.081.0193.3213.9185.0268.22311.974.2116.3
Anus20.110.150.500.050.630.571.330.872.231.610.621.1
Liver10.120.200.0131.5151.9305.25510.16117.04714.84724.32917.22614.9
Gall bladder and so on10.110.110.130.340.530.5162.9133.6165.0147.274.2137.4
Pancreas10.100.010.100.060.881.471.3113.141.394.784.721.1
Other ill-defined digestive10.100.000.000.010.130.520.410.320.642.100.021.1
Nose, sinuses30.220.200.020.210.130.530.651.430.931.642.400.0
Larynx40.300.020.240.5121.5223.8254.6287.83310.42412.41911.3105.7
Trachea, bronchus and lung20.110.160.6171.9141.8335.7264.84713.16821.46232.06337.45732.6
Other thoracic organs00.000.010.120.220.310.261.100.020.610.531.852.9
Bone161.060.560.660.750.650.930.610.3103.110.531.810.6
Melanoma of the skin00.010.110.110.100.000.000.041.100.010.500.031.7
Other skin40.3110.9171.6182.0182.3162.8224.1318.63611.33216.51710.13721.2
Connective and soft tissue130.8141.180.7101.140.5162.861.192.592.873.674.252.9
Breast10.110.100.030.370.9122.181.571.961.9178.842.431.7
Penis00.000.000.000.010.100.000.000.000.000.000.000.0
Prostate20.110.100.000.020.361.0244.44713.18627.18946.011769.415287.0
Testis171.1151.2131.2101.181.040.730.610.310.331.610.610.6
Other male genital organs10.100.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.021.010.600.0
Kidney20.120.230.380.9212.7193.3183.3205.6206.3147.2169.5105.7
Renal pelvis00.000.000.000.000.000.000.010.300.000.000.000.0
Ureter00.000.000.000.000.000.000.010.300.000.000.000.0
Bladder10.130.240.4161.8172.2345.9417.56919.27323.05830.05029.77442.4
Other urinary organs00.000.010.100.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.010.6
Eye20.110.100.010.110.140.730.610.351.642.142.421.1
Brain, nervous system241.6362.9494.5394.4395.0427.3488.83810.63611.3199.8148.363.4
Thyroid30.290.790.830.360.881.4101.8123.351.652.653.021.1
Adrenal20.100.000.000.000.010.200.010.300.000.010.600.0
Hodgkin lymphoma140.9181.4131.2121.4121.591.681.5123.361.984.163.610.6
Non-Hodgkin lymphoma302.0201.6272.5222.5364.6345.95510.14211.75818.33518.12816.62514.3
Multiple myeloma00.000.020.220.240.571.271.392.5103.131.642.442.3
Lymphoid leukaemia80.530.230.310.160.820.350.920.620.642.100.031.7
Myeloid leukaemia110.7100.8100.9121.481.061.040.771.961.942.100.010.6
Other leukaemias10.110.100.000.010.100.020.400.000.000.010.600.0
Leukaemia unspecified70.530.230.310.120.320.310.210.320.600.010.600.0
Other and unspecified60.4252.0282.6262.9374.8356.06612.26718.77623.95528.44325.56134.9
Benign CNS120.8252.0211.9212.4162.1193.3183.341.1103.131.653.010.6
All sites (n (%))228 (3.8)14.8257 (4.3)20.6296 (4.9)27.4337 (5.6)38.0418 (7.0)53.7539 (9.0)93.1643 (10.7)118.4697 (11.6)194.0811 (13.5)255.2652 (10.9)337.0556 (9.3)329.7573 (9.5)328.0

CNS, central nervous system.

  11 in total

1.  International Classification of Childhood Cancer, third edition.

Authors:  Eva Steliarova-Foucher; Charles Stiller; Brigitte Lacour; Peter Kaatsch
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Risk factors for breast cancer in Pakistani women aged less than 45 years.

Authors:  Ghausia Masood Gilani; Shahid Kamal
Journal:  Ann Hum Biol       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.533

3.  Breast cancer risk factors: a comparison between pre-menopausal and post-menopausal women.

Authors:  Zeeshan Butt; Syed Furqan Haider; Shumaila Arif; Muhammad Raza Khan; Umair Ashfaq; Umer Shahbaz; Mulazam Hussain Bukhari
Journal:  J Pak Med Assoc       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 0.781

4.  Risk factors for breast cancer in patients treated at NORI Hospital, Islamabad.

Authors:  Muhammad Faheem; Muhammad Khurram; Imran Ali Jafri; Humera Mehmood; Zubair Hasan; Ghulam Sabir Iqbal; Farooq Maqsood; S Rafaqt Ali Jafri
Journal:  J Pak Med Assoc       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 0.781

5.  Epidemiology of Breast Cancer at the Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Center, Lahore, Pakistan.

Authors:  Farhana Badar; Shahid Mahmood; Raqib Faraz; Ain Ul Quader; Hina Asif; Adna Yousaf
Journal:  J Coll Physicians Surg Pak       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 0.711

6.  CANCERS AMONG CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS AT A CANCER HOSPITAL IN PAKISTAN.

Authors:  Farhana Badar; Shahid Mahmood
Journal:  J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec

Review 7.  Epidemiology of childhood cancer in India.

Authors:  R S Arora; T O B Eden; G Kapoor
Journal:  Indian J Cancer       Date:  2009 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.224

8.  Age-standardized incidence rates for childhood cancers at a cancer hospital in a developing country.

Authors:  Farhana Badar; Shahid Mahmood; Alia Zaidi; Yasmin Bhurgri
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2009

9.  Epidemiology of cancers in Lahore, Pakistan, 2010-2012: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Farhana Badar; Shahid Mahmood; Muhammed Aasim Yusuf; Faisal Sultan
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Epidemiology of childhood and adolescent cancer in Bangladesh, 2001-2014.

Authors:  Mohammad Sorowar Hossain; Mamtaz Begum; Md Mahmuduzzaman Mian; Shameema Ferdous; Shahinur Kabir; Humayun Kabir Sarker; Sabina Karim; Salma Choudhury; Asaduzzaman Khan; Zohora Jameela Khan; Henrike E Karim-Kos
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  6 in total

1.  Cancer in Lahore, Pakistan, 2010-2019: an incidence study.

Authors:  Farhana Badar; Shahid Mahmood
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 3.006

2.  Comparative study of adjuvant chemotherapeutic efficacy of docetaxel plus cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide in female breast cancer.

Authors:  Muhammad Adeel; Muhammad Asif; Muhammad Naeem Faisal; Muhammad Hasanain Chaudary; Muhammad Sheraz Malik; Muhammad Khalid
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 3.989

3.  Prostate cancer survival estimates: An application with piecewise hazard function derivation.

Authors:  Atanu Bhattacharjee; Atul Budukh; Rajesh Dikshit
Journal:  South Asian J Cancer       Date:  2019 Jul-Sep

Review 4.  Cancer incidence and mortality trends in young adults in Metropolitan Lima young adults, 1990-2012.

Authors:  Jorge Luna-Abanto; Luis García Ruiz; Jheff Laura-Martinez; Tessy Tairo-Cerron
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2020-04-20

5.  A clinical trial of cognitive behavior therapy for psychiatric comorbidity and quality of life with Cancer Patients during Chemotherapy (CPdC).

Authors:  Qasir Abbas; Nimra Arooj; Khawer Bilal Baig; Muhammad Umar Khan; Muhammad Khalid; Mafia Shahzadi
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 3.630

6.  Breast Cancer in Pakistan: Alarming Situation of Breast Cancer in Near Future.

Authors:  Muhammad Arif; Mohsin Javed; Hamid Raza
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.429

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.