Literature DB >> 29273323

Durability of Aortic Valve Cusp Repair With and Without Annular Support.

Ahmad Zeeshan1, Jay J Idrees1, Douglas R Johnston1, Jeevanantham Rajeswaran2, Eric E Roselli1, Edward G Soltesz1, A Marc Gillinov1, Brian Griffin3, Richard Grimm3, Donald F Hammer3, Gösta B Pettersson1, Eugene H Blackstone4, Joseph F Sabik1, Lars G Svensson5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To determine the value of aortic valve repair rather than replacement for valve dysfunction, we assessed late outcomes of various repair techniques in the contemporary era.
METHODS: From January 2001 to January 2011, aortic valve repair was planned in 1,124 patients. Techniques involved commissural figure-of-8 suspension sutures (n = 63 [6.2%]), cusp repair with commissuroplasty (n = 481 [48%]), debridement (n = 174 [17%]), free-margin plication (n = 271 [27%]) or resection (n = 75) or both, or annulus repair with resuspension (n = 230 [23%]), root reimplantation (n = 252 [25%]), or remodeling (n = 35 [3.5%]).
RESULTS: Planned repair was aborted for replacement in 115 patients (10%); risk factors included greater severity of aortic regurgitation (AR; p = 0.0002) and valve calcification (p < 0.0001). In-hospital outcomes for the remaining 1,009 patients included death (12 [1.2%]), stroke (13 [1.3%]), and reoperation for valve dysfunction (14 [1.4%]). Freedom from aortic valve reoperation at 1, 5, and 10 years was 97%, 93%, and 90%, respectively. Figure-of-8 suspension sutures, valve resuspension, and root repair and replacement were least likely to require reoperation; cusp repair with commissural sutures, plication, and commissuroplasty was most likely (p < 0.05). Survival at 1, 5, and 10 years was 96%, 92%, and 83%. Immediate postoperative AR grade was none-mild (94%), moderate (5%), and severe (1%). At 10 years after repair, AR grade was none (20%), mild (33%), moderate (26%), and severe (21%). Patients undergoing root procedures were less likely to have higher-grade postoperative AR (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Valve repair is effective and durable for treating aortic valve dysfunction. Greater severity of AR preoperatively is associated with higher likelihood of repair failure. Commissural figure-of-8 suspension sutures and repair with annular support have the best long-term durability.
Copyright © 2018 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29273323     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.09.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  9 in total

1.  Aortic and mitral valve repair for anterior mitral leaflet perforation caused by severe aortic regurgitation.

Authors:  Kristof De Brabandere; Jens-Uwe Voigt; Stephen Rex; Bart Meuris; Peter Verbrugghe
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2018-05-11

Review 2.  Aortic valve repair for aortic regurgitation and preoperative echocardiographic assessment.

Authors:  Takashi Kunihara
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 1.314

3.  Comparison of outcomes following isolated repair of tricuspid versus bicuspid aortic valves.

Authors:  Anatol Prinzing; Johannes Boehm; Magdalena Erlebach; Konstantinos Sideris; Ruediger Lange; Markus Krane
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 4.  Valvular heart disease in congenital heart disease: a narrative review.

Authors:  Joshua M Saef; Joanna Ghobrial
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-06

5.  International Consensus Statement on Nomenclature and Classification of the Congenital Bicuspid Aortic Valve and Its Aortopathy, for Clinical, Surgical, Interventional and Research Purposes.

Authors:  Hector I Michelena; Alessandro Della Corte; Arturo Evangelista; Joseph J Maleszewski; William D Edwards; Mary J Roman; Richard B Devereux; Borja Fernández; Federico M Asch; Alex J Barker; Lilia M Sierra-Galan; Laurent De Kerchove; Susan M Fernandes; Paul W M Fedak; Evaldas Girdauskas; Victoria Delgado; Suhny Abbara; Emmanuel Lansac; Siddharth K Prakash; Malenka M Bissell; Bogdan A Popescu; Michael D Hope; Marta Sitges; Vinod H Thourani; Phillippe Pibarot; Krishnaswamy Chandrasekaran; Patrizio Lancellotti; Michael A Borger; John K Forrest; John Webb; Dianna M Milewicz; Raj Makkaar; Martin B Leon; Stephen P Sanders; Michael Markl; Victor A Ferrari; William C Roberts; Jae-Kwan Song; Philipp Blanke; Charles S White; Samuel Siu; Lars G Svensson; Alan C Braverman; Joseph Bavaria; Thoralf M Sundt; Gebrine El Khoury; Ruggero De Paulis; Maurice Enriquez-Sarano; Jeroen J Bax; Catherine M Otto; Hans-Joachim Schäfers
Journal:  Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging       Date:  2021-07-22

6.  Comparison of Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Reimplantation versus Bentall Root Procedure.

Authors:  Lars G Svensson; Brad F Rosinski; Nicholas J Tucker; A Marc Gillinov; Jeevanantham Rajeswaran; Eric E Roselli; Douglas R Johnston; Milind Y Desai; Brian P Griffin; Eugene H Blackstone
Journal:  Aorta (Stamford)       Date:  2022-08-07

7.  The art of aortic valve repair.

Authors:  Lars G Svensson
Journal:  JTCVS Tech       Date:  2021-01-28

Review 8.  Unraveling Bicuspid Aortic Valve Enigmas by Multimodality Imaging: Clinical Implications.

Authors:  Arturo Evangelista Masip; Laura Galian-Gay; Andrea Guala; Angela Lopez-Sainz; Gisela Teixido-Turà; Aroa Ruiz Muñoz; Filipa Valente; Laura Gutierrez; Ruben Fernandez-Galera; Guillem Casas; Alejandro Panaro; Alba Marigliano; Marina Huguet; Teresa González-Alujas; Jose Rodriguez-Palomares
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 4.241

9.  Commentary: Getting to the art of the matter with aortic valve repair.

Authors:  John M Trahanas; Edward P Chen
Journal:  JTCVS Tech       Date:  2021-02-27
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.