Literature DB >> 29273234

Body surface activation mapping of electrical dyssynchrony in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients: Potential for optimization.

Alan J Bank1, Ryan M Gage2, Antonia E Curtin3, Kevin V Burns2, Jeffrey M Gillberg4, Subham Ghosh4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Electrical synchronization is likely improved by cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), but is difficult to quantify with 12-lead ECG. We aimed to quantify changes in electrical synchrony and potential for optimization with CRT using a body-surface activation mapping (BSAM) system.
METHODS: Standard deviation of activation times (SDAT) was calculated in 94 patients using BSAM at baseline CRT (CRTbl), native, and different CRT configurations.
RESULTS: SDAT decreased 20% from native to CRTbl (p<0.01) and an additional 26% (p<0.01) at optimal CRT (CRTopt), the minimal SDAT setting. Patients with LBBB and patients with QRS duration ≥150ms had higher native SDAT and greater decrease with CRTbl (p<0.01); however, the improvement from CRTbl to CRTopt was similar in all four groups (range: 24-28%). CRTopt was achieved with biventricular pacing in 52% and LV-only pacing in 44%. We propose that improved wavefront fusion demonstrated by BSAMs contributed substantially to the improved electrical synchrony.
CONCLUSION: Optimization potential is similar regardless of pre-CRT QRS morphology or duration. BSAM could possibly improve CRT response by individualizing device programming to minimize electrical dyssynchrony.
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Body surface mapping; Cardiac resynchronization therapy; Electrical dyssynchrony; Heart failure; Optimization

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29273234     DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2017.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Electrocardiol        ISSN: 0022-0736            Impact factor:   1.438


  6 in total

Review 1.  Non-invasive cardiac mapping for non-response in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Marc Strik; Sylvain Ploux; Lior Jankelson; Pierre Bordachar
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 4.709

2.  Non-invasive assessment of ventricular electrical heterogeneity to optimize left bundle branch area pacing.

Authors:  Pugazhendhi Vijayaraman; Grace Hughes; Marilee Manganiello; Alicia Johns; Subham Ghosh
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 1.759

3.  Body Surface Potential Mapping: Contemporary Applications and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Jake Bergquist; Lindsay Rupp; Brian Zenger; James Brundage; Anna Busatto; Rob S MacLeod
Journal:  Hearts (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-05

4.  Twelve-Lead ECG Optimization of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With and Without Delayed Enhancement on Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Ryan M Gage; Akbar H Khan; Imran S Syed; Ambareesh Bajpai; Kevin V Burns; Antonia E Curtin; Amanda L Blanchard; Jeffrey M Gillberg; Subham Ghosh; Alan J Bank
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 5.  Optimal CRT Implantation-Where and How To Place the Left-Ventricular Lead?

Authors:  Christian Butter; Christian Georgi; Martin Stockburger
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2021-09-08

Review 6.  Ventricular Dyssynchrony and Pacing-induced Cardiomyopathy in Patients with Pacemakers, the Utility of Ultra-high-frequency ECG and Other Dyssynchrony Assessment Tools.

Authors:  Jan Mizner; Pavel Jurak; Hana Linkova; Radovan Smisek; Karol Curila
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2022-04
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.