Literature DB >> 29272538

Evaluation of the performance of Hy-Line Brown laying hens fed soybean or soybean-free diets using cage or free-range rearing systems.

M N Al-Ajeeli1, H Leyva-Jimenez1, R A Abdaljaleel1, Y Jameel1, M M Hashim1, G Archer1, C A Bailey1.   

Abstract

This study evaluated egg production and quality variables of caged and free-range Hy-Line Brown laying hens fed soybean meal (SBM) and soybean-meal-free (SBMF) diets. Hens were randomly assigned to the same 2 dietary treatments within 3 location blocks. SBM and SBMF diets with equivalent calculated nutrient content were prepared based on Hy-Line Brown rearing guidelines. The SBMF diets utilized cottonseed meal, corn distillers dried grains with solubles, corn gluten meal, and wheat middlings in place of dehulled soybean meal. The experiment was conducted between August 2015 and January of 2016 within the TAMU Poultry Research Center and data analyzed over 6 consecutive 28-day periods. Data were analyzed as a split-plot with rearing systems designated whole plots and diets designated as subplots. Hens reared in the free-range rearing system peaked a couple of wk later than those hens within the more conventional indoor caged system, and cumulative production data were considerably more variable for hens raised in the free-range environment. Cumulative egg production, feed per dozen eggs and feed conversion ratio (g feed/g egg) were 92 ± 1.23 and 86 ± 1.84%, 1.45 ± 0.02 and 1.89 ± 0.05 kg, and 2.14 ± 0.04 and 2.77 ± 0.08 (P < 0.05), respectively, for the caged vs. free-range rearing systems. Cumulative egg weight, feed per dozen eggs, and feed conversion ratio were 59.9 ± 0.59 and 56.5 ± 0.60 g, 1.57 ± 0.04 and 1.77 ± 0.05 kg, and 2.24 ± 0.06 and 2.67 ± 0.08 kg (P < 0.05) for SBM and SBMF diets, respectively. Diet did not affect cumulative egg production (P > 0.05). With respect to egg quality, there were no differences in cumulative albumen height, Haugh unit, or breaking strength, but there was a significant rearing system by diet interaction for shell thickness, with the free-range hens averaging 40.77 ± 0.19 and 39.86 ± 0.31 μm (P < 0.05), respectively, for the hens fed SBM vs. SBMF diets. In conclusion, the results suggested free-range production is more variable than traditional closed-house cage systems based on standard errors, and SBMF diets containing cottonseed meal can be used in both caged and free-range production systems without affecting egg production, although one might see lower egg weights.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29272538     DOI: 10.3382/ps/pex368

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  7 in total

1.  The Role of Housing Environment and Dietary Protein Source on the Gut Microbiota of Chicken.

Authors:  Shawna Marie Hubert; Morouj Al-Ajeeli; Christopher A Bailey; Giridhar Athrey
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 2.  Gastrointestinal microbiomes of broilers and layer hens in alternative production systems.

Authors:  Steven C Ricke; Michael J Rothrock
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Prebiotics and alternative poultry production.

Authors:  Steven C Ricke
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Communicating the utility of the microbiome and bioinformatics to small flock poultry producers.

Authors:  Steven C Ricke; Dana K Dittoe; Ashley A Tarcin; Michael J Rothrock
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 4.014

5.  The Relationship between Animal Welfare and Farm Profitability in Cage and Free-Range Housing Systems for Laying Hens in China.

Authors:  Shuai He; Jiao Lin; Qiongyu Jin; Xiaohan Ma; Zhongying Liu; Hui Chen; Ji Ma; Huancheng Zhang; Kris Descovich; Clive J C Phillips; Kate Hartcher; Zhonghong Wu
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 3.231

6.  Impacts of Dietary Protein and Prebiotic Inclusion on Liver and Spleen Gene Expression in Hy-Line Brown Caged Layers.

Authors:  Morouj N Al-Ajeeli; Shawna M Hubert; Hector Leyva-Jimenez; Mohammed M Hashim; Raghad A Abdaljaleel; Akhil M Alsadwi; Giridhar Athrey; Christopher A Bailey
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Effects of indoor stocking density on performance, egg quality, and welfare status of a native chicken during 22 to 38 weeks.

Authors:  A L Geng; H G Liu; Y Zhang; J Zhang; H H Wang; Q Chu; Z X Yan
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 3.352

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.