| Literature DB >> 29272394 |
Maeva Mollion1, Bodil K Ehlers2, Emeric Figuet3, Sylvain Santoni4, Thomas Lenormand5, Sandrine Maurice3, Nicolas Galtier3, Thomas Bataillon1.
Abstract
Gynodioecy is a sexual dimorphism where females coexist with hermaphrodite individuals. In most cases, this dimorphism involves the interaction of cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS) genes and nuclear restorer genes. Two scenarios can account for how these interactions maintain gynodioecy. Either CMS genes recurrently enter populations at low frequency via mutation or migration and go to fixation unimpeded (successive sweeps), or CMS genes maintain polymorphism over evolutionary time through interactions with a nuclear restorer allele (balanced polymorphism). To distinguish between these scenarios, we used transcriptome sequencing in gynodioecious Thymus vulgaris and surveyed genome-wide diversity in 18 naturally occurring individuals sampled from populations at a local geographic scale. We contrast the amount and patterns of nucleotide diversity in the nuclear and cytoplasmic genome, and find ample diversity at the nuclear level (π = 0.019 at synonymous sites) but reduced genetic diversity and an excess of rare polymorphisms in the cytoplasmic genome relative to the nuclear genome. Our finding is incompatible with the maintenance of gynodioecy via scenarios invoking long-term balancing selection, and instead suggests the recent fixation of CMS lineages in the populations studied.Entities:
Keywords: Thymus vulgaris; balancing selection; cytoplasmic male sterility; selective sweeps; single nucleotide polymorphism
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29272394 PMCID: PMC5815141 DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evx272
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genome Biol Evol ISSN: 1759-6653 Impact factor: 3.416
Summary of Possible Scenarios for the Maintenance of Gynodioecy and Their Expected Impact on Patterns of Genome Diversity
| Scenario | Expected Footprint on Genome Diversity | References |
|---|---|---|
| (A) Epidemic scenario | ||
| New CMS genes and matching nuclear restorer alleles regularly enter the population (via mutation and/or migration) and sweep to fixation. | Strong recent sweep signal in the whole cytoplasmic genome Sweep signal at and in the immediate vicinity of restorer genes Neutrality in the nuclear genome except for demographic and sampling effects | |
| (B) Balancing selection | ||
| One or more CMS types and their matching nuclear restorer alleles carrying pleiotropic fitness costs reach a polymorphic equilibrium. This equilibrium goes from punctuated equilibria to cycles of varying amplitude and period depending on the parameter values. | Balancing selection, possibly complicated by the amplitude of the cycles in the whole cytoplasmic genome and at the nuclear restorer genes and their immediate genomic vicinity. Neutrality in the rest of the nuclear genome. | |
| (C) Metapopulation effect | ||
| A metapopulation with extinction–recolonization with two CMS genes. Strong founder effects with no subsequent migration and the fact that populations have different outputs depending on their local sex ratio are enough to maintain polymorphism of both CMS genes and their matching restorer alleles. | Balancing selection, possibly complicated by the metapopulation effect. Nuclear genome neutrality, but the effect of sampling and metapopulation functioning might skew expectations relative to a stable nonsubdivided population. |
. 1.—Contrasting expectations for Tajima’s D statistic in cytoplasmic genomes relative to nuclear genomes under scenarios A and B. Scenario A involves recurrent selective sweeps of new CMS alleles (counteracted by recurrent selection of novel restorer [Rf] alleles that also periodically go to fixation). Scenario B involves balancing selection that maintains both CMS and restorer gene polymorphism over long time periods. If a recent sweep has affected CMS (scenario A), one expects fragments anchored in the cytoplasmic genome to exhibit negative TD values relative to the values in the nuclear genome. Conversely, if balancing selection affects CMS (scenario B), we expect both cytoplasmic organelles to exhibit positive TD values relative to the nuclear genome. The histogram represents the hypothetical distribution of expected TD values across nuclear fragments under neutrality. Further description of these scenarios is given in table 1.
Thymus vulgaris Transcriptome Assembly Characteristics
| Contigs Set | N50 (bp) | Mean Length (bp) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Filtered contigs | 1,11,942 | 1,004 | 681 |
| Contigs containing ORFs | 51,615 | 1,074 | 710 |
| Homology to mitochondrion | 131 | 756 | 562 |
| Homology to chloroplast | 75 | 852 | 597 |
ORF: open reading frames; N50: median size of contigs.
. 2.—Genome-wide distribution of summary statistics of nucleotide diversity. Histograms denote genome-wide distributions of nuclear contigs. Individual ticks mark the values for contigs in the mitochondrial (top red) and chloroplast (bottom green) genomes. (a) Nucleotide diversity at synonymous positions (piS). (b) Distribution of the ratios of nucleotide diversity at nonsynonymous and synonymous sites (piN/piS).
Mean and SEs of Nucleotide Diversity Statistics in Nuclear, Chloroplastic, and Mitochondrial Contigs
| Genome | piN | piS | Tajima’s | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nuclear | 18909 | 0.0031 (<0.0001) | 0.0197 (<0.0001) | 0.018 (<0.0001) | 0.30 (0.009) |
| Mitochondrial | 26 | 0.0005 (0.0007) | 0.0005 (0.0002) | n.a. | −1.93 |
| Chloroplastic | 6 | 0.0007 (0.0004) | 0.0004 (0.0002) | n.a. | −1.80 |
Note.—n denotes the number of polymorphic contigs per genome.
Fis is only computed for nuclear contigs.
we report a single value for the concatenated contigs of each organelle (no SE reported).
Homology Between Chloroplasts and Mitochondria for Five Plant Species
| Species | Genbank Reference Chloroplast/Mitochondrion | Length Chloroplast/Mitochondrion and Ratio | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NC_000932/NC_001284.2 | 154478/366924 = 0.4 | 4–5 | 1 | |
| NC_003119/NC_029641.1 | 124033/271618 = 0.45 | 1 | <1 | |
| NC_016730.1/HM562727.1 | 151736/253413 = 0.59 | 1 | <1 | |
| KT289404.1/BA000029.3 | 134536/490520 = 0.27 | 18 | 6 | |
| NC_001666/NC_007982.1 | 140384/569630 = 0.24 | 29 | 4 |
Reciprocal homology searches using mitochondrial or chloroplast sequences as Query/Database were performed to assess the amount of genes that shared exhibited shared homology between these two genomes.
. 3—Genome-wide distribution of Tajima’s D statistic in the nuclear (blue histogram) genome versus cytoplasmic contigs (red: mitochondrial genome; green: cytoplasmic genome; orange: supercontig). Tajima’s D for the chloroplasts lies in the 0.0089th quantile of most negative values observed in the nuclear genome. Tajima’s D for the mitochondria lies in the 0.0027th quantile of most negative values.