L Grassi1,2, M G Nanni1,2, G Rodin3,4,5, M Li3,4,5, R Caruso1,2. 1. Department of Biomedical and Specialty Surgical Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy. 2. University Hospital Psychiatry Unit, Integrated Department of Mental Health and Addictive Behavior, S. Anna University Hospital and Health Authorities, Ferrara, Italy. 3. Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada. 4. Department of Supportive Care, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada. 5. Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Abstract
Background: The use of psychotropic drugs, namely those with an antidepressant profile (ADs), is a mandatory part of an integrated treatment of psychiatric disorders among cancer patients. We aimed to synthetize the most relevant data emerging from published studies to provide tips about the use of ADs in oncology. Design: A search was made of the major databases over the last 30 years (Embase/Medline, PsycLIT, PsycINFO, the Cochrane Library), including narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses summarizing the results from observational studies and randomized clinical trials assessing effectiveness, safety profile, interactions, contraindications and use of ADs in oncology with regard to both psychiatric (depressive spectrum, stress-related, anxiety disorders) and cancer-related symptoms (e.g. pain, hot flashes and fatigue). Results: The weight of evidence supports the efficacy of ADs for more severe major depression in individuals with cancer and as an adjuvant treatment in cancer-related symptoms, although the methodological limitations of reported randomized controlled trials do not permit definite conclusions. Data also indicate that there should be caution in the use of ADs in cancer patients in terms of their safety profile and potential clinically significant interactions with other prescribed medications. Practical recommendations that have been made for the use of ADs in cancer patients, in the context of a multimodal approach to depression treatment, have been summarized here. Conclusions: ADs are a relatively safe and effective treatment for more severe major depression in cancer patients. However, more research is urgently needed regarding the efficacy of ADs in different cancer types and cancer settings, their interactions with anticancer agents and their additive benefit when integrated with psychosocial interventions.
Background: The use of psychotropic drugs, namely those with an antidepressant profile (ADs), is a mandatory part of an integrated treatment of psychiatric disorders among cancerpatients. We aimed to synthetize the most relevant data emerging from published studies to provide tips about the use of ADs in oncology. Design: A search was made of the major databases over the last 30 years (Embase/Medline, PsycLIT, PsycINFO, the Cochrane Library), including narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses summarizing the results from observational studies and randomized clinical trials assessing effectiveness, safety profile, interactions, contraindications and use of ADs in oncology with regard to both psychiatric (depressive spectrum, stress-related, anxiety disorders) and cancer-related symptoms (e.g. pain, hot flashes and fatigue). Results: The weight of evidence supports the efficacy of ADs for more severe major depression in individuals with cancer and as an adjuvant treatment in cancer-related symptoms, although the methodological limitations of reported randomized controlled trials do not permit definite conclusions. Data also indicate that there should be caution in the use of ADs in cancerpatients in terms of their safety profile and potential clinically significant interactions with other prescribed medications. Practical recommendations that have been made for the use of ADs in cancerpatients, in the context of a multimodal approach to depression treatment, have been summarized here. Conclusions: ADs are a relatively safe and effective treatment for more severe major depression in cancerpatients. However, more research is urgently needed regarding the efficacy of ADs in different cancer types and cancer settings, their interactions with anticancer agents and their additive benefit when integrated with psychosocial interventions.
Authors: Gaia Pocobelli; Onchee Yu; Rebecca A Ziebell; Erin J Aiello Bowles; Monica M Fujii; Andrew T Sterrett; Jennifer M Boggs; Lu Chen; Denise M Boudreau; Debra P Ritzwoller; Rebecca A Hubbard; Jessica Chubak Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2019-02-14 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Shirin ArdeshirRouhaniFard; Paul C Dinh; Patrick O Monahan; Sophie D Fossa; Robert Huddart; Chunkit Fung; Yiqing Song; Darren R Feldman; Robert J Hamilton; David J Vaughn; Neil E Martin; Christian Kollmannsberger; Lawrence Einhorn; Kurt Kroenke; Lois B Travis Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2021-04-13 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Nicole Bates; Jennifer K Bello; Nosayaba Osazuwa-Peters; Mark D Sullivan; Jeffrey F Scherrer Journal: Curr Treat Options Oncol Date: 2022-03-07
Authors: Erik E Rabin; Miri Kim; Andreas Mozny; Krislyn Cardoza; April C Bell; Lijie Zhai; Prashant Bommi; Kristen L Lauing; Amanda L King; Terri S Armstrong; Theresa L Walunas; Deyu Fang; Ishan Roy; John D Peipert; Erica Sieg; Xinlei Mi; Christina Amidei; Rimas V Lukas; Derek A Wainwright Journal: Brain Behav Immun Health Date: 2022-03-23