Literature DB >> 29271973

Correction to: Understanding Plain English Summaries: A Comparison of two Approaches to Improve the Quality of Plain English Summaries in Research.

Emma Kirkpatrick1, Wendy Gaisford2, Elaine Williams3, Elizabeth Brindley3, Doreen Tembo3, David Wright3.   

Abstract

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1186/s40900-017-0064-0.].

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 29271973      PMCID: PMC5735929          DOI: 10.1186/s40900-017-0082-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Involv Engagem        ISSN: 2056-7529


Correction

After publication of our article [1] it has come to our attention that Fig. 3 was accidentally omitted. In the section “Ease of reading”, the sentence “FRE scores were recorded for the original, author-revised and independently edited PES (Fig. 2).” should read “FRE scores were recorded for the original, author-revised and independently edited PES (Fig. 3).” Figure 3 and its legend appear below.
Fig. 3

FRE score for summaries compared across three groups. Horizontal dashed line indicates an FRE of 50, which is approximately equivalent to a broadsheet newspaper [27]

FRE score for summaries compared across three groups. Horizontal dashed line indicates an FRE of 50, which is approximately equivalent to a broadsheet newspaper [27]
  1 in total

1.  Understanding Plain English summaries. A comparison of two approaches to improve the quality of Plain English summaries in research reports.

Authors:  Emma Kirkpatrick; Wendy Gaisford; Elaine Williams; Elizabeth Brindley; Doreen Tembo; David Wright
Journal:  Res Involv Engagem       Date:  2017-10-09
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.